MR angiography of renal artery stenosis: Value of the combination of three-dimensional time-of-flight and three-dimensional phase-contrast MR angiography sequences

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 167, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 489-494

  Loubeyre, Pierre ^a   Trolliet, Pierre ^a   Cahen, Rémy ^a   Grozel, Florence ^a   Labeeuw, Michel ^a   Van Minh, André Tran ^a  

^a CENTRE HOSPITALIER LYON SUD   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; KIDNEY ARTERY STENOSIS; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RENAL ARTERY; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO;

EID: 0029812412     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.167.2.8686634     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Working Group on Renovascular Hypertension. Final report of the working group on renovascular hypertension. Arch Intent Med 1987; 147:8 20-8 29
2. Gedroyc \VM. Magnetic resonance angiography of renal arteries. Urol Clin North Am 1994; 2 1: 20 1- 2 14
3. Thomsen HS, Sos TA, Nielsen SL. Renovascular hypertension: diagnosis and intervention. Ada Radial 1989;30:\ 13- 1 20
4. Chen CC, Hoffer PB, Walijen G, et al. Patients at high risk for renal artery stenosis: a simple method of scintigraphic analysis with Tc-99m DTPA and captopril. Radiology 1990; 176:365-370
5. Middleton WD. Doppler US evaluation of renal artery stenosis: past, present, and future. Radiology 199 2; 184:307-308
6. Glanski M, Prokop M, Chavan A, Schaefer CM, Jandeleit K, Nischelsky JE. Renal arterial stenoses: spiral CT angiography. Radiology 1993; 189: 185- 19 2
7. Rubin GD, Dake MD, Napel S, et al. Spiral CT of renal artery stenosis: comparison of three-dimensional rendering techniques. Radiology 1994; 190: 18 1- 189
8. Debatin JF, Spritzer CE, Grist TM, et al. Imaging of the renal arteries: value of MR angiography. AJR 199 1; 157:98 1-990
9. Kent KC, Edelman RR, Kim D, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging: a reliable test for the evaluation of proximal atherosclerotic renal arterial stenosis. J VascSurg 199 1; 13:3 1 1-3 18
10. Kim D, Edelman RR, Kent KC, Porter DH, Skillman JJ. Abdominal aorta and renal artery stenosis: evaluation with MR angiography. Radiology 1990; 174:7 27-73 1
11. 1. Price RR, Creasy JL, Lorenz CH, Portain CL. Magnetic resonance angiography techniques. Invest Radial 199 2; 27:S 27-S3 2
12. 2. Loubeyre P, Revel D, Garcia P, et al. Screening patients for renal artery stenosis: value of threedimensional time-of-flight MR angiography. AJR 1994; 16 2:847-85 2
13. Dumoulin CL, Souza SP, Walker MF, Wagle W. Three-dimensional phase contrast angiography. Magn Reson Med 1989;9: 139- 149
14. Vock BP, Terrier F, Wegmüller H, et al. Magnetic resonance angiography of abdominal vessels: early experience using the three-dimensional phase-contrast technique. BrJ Radial 199 1;64: 10- 16
15. Gyroscan NT. Application guide for users, vol. 2. Scan methods. Eindhoven, the Netherlands: Philips Medical Systems, 1993:77-79
16. Laub G. Displays for MR angiography. Magn Reson Med 1990; 14: 2 2 2- 2 29
17. Dumoulin CL, Yucel EK, Vock P, et al. Two- and three-dimensional phase contrast MR angiogra-phy of the abdomen. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1990;I4:779-784
18. Grist TM, Kennel TW, Sproat IA, et al. A prospective evaluation of renal MRA for detecting renal artery stenosis in 35 consecutive patients. In Proceedings of the Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 1. Berkeley, CA: Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 1993: 187
19. Hausman R, Lewin JS, Laub G. Phase-contrast MR angiography with reduced acquisition time: new concepts in sequence design. / Magn Reson Imaging 199 1: 1:4 15-4 2 2
20. Saloner D, Selby K, Anderson CM. MRA studies of arterial stenosis: improvements by diastolic acquisition. Magn Reson Med 1994;3 1: 196- 203
21. 1. Li D, Haacke EM, Mugler JP, Ben S, Brookeman JR, Hutton MC. Three-dimensional time-offlight MR angiography using selective inversion recovery RAGE with fat saturation and ECG-triggering: application to renal arteries. Afagn Reson Med 1994;3 1:4 14-4 2 2
22. 2. Korosec FR, Mistretta CA, Turski PA. ECG-optimized phase contrast line-scanned MR angiography. Magn Reson Med 199 2; 24: 2 2 1- 235
23. Steinberg FL, Yucel EK, Dumoulin CL, et al. Peripheral vascular and abdominal applications of MR flow imaging techniques. Afagn Reson Med 1990: 14:3 15-3 20
24. Franck A, Selby K, Van Tyen R, Nordell B, Salomer D. Cardiac-gated MR angiography of pulsatile flow: k-space strategies. JMagn Reson Imaging 1995:5: 297-307
25. Meyers SP, Talagala SL, Totterman S, et al. Evaluation of the renal arteries in kidney donors: value of three-dimensional phase-contrast MR angiography with maximum-intensity-projection or surface rendering. AJR 1995: 164: 1 17- 1 2 1
26. Atkinson D, Brant-Zawadzki M, Gillan G, Purdy D, Laub G. Improved MR angiography: magnetization transfer suppression with variable flip angle excitation and increased resolution, /fat/io/0£yl994; 190:89Q-894
27. Creasy JL, Price RR, Presbey T, Coins D, Partain CL, Kessler RM. Gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. Radiology 1990; 175: 280- 283
28. Prince MR. Gadolinium-enhanced MR aortography. Radiology 1994; 19 1: 155- 164
29. Brasch RC. New directions in the development of MR imaging contrast media. Radiology 199 2; 183: 1- 1 1
30. Debatin JF, Sostman HD, Knelson M, Argabright M, Spritzer CE. Renal magnetic resonance angiography in the preoperative detection of supernumerary renal arteries in potential kidney donors. Invest Radial 1993: 28:88 2-889
31. 1. Urchuk SN, Plewes DB. Mechanisms of flowinduced signal loss in MR angiography. J Magn Keson Imaging 199 2; 2:45346 2