Biomimetic robot navigation

Robotics and Autonomous Systems

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 133-153

  Franz, Matthias O ^a   Mallot, Hanspeter A ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL CYBERNETICS   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS; MOTION PLANNING; ROBOTICS;

BIOMIMETIC ROBOT NAVIGATIONS; COGNITIVE MAPS; TOPOLOGICAL MAPS;

MOBILE ROBOTS;

EID: 0033894466     PISSN: 09218890     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0921-8890(99)00069-X     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. Bachelder I.A., Waxman A.M. A view-based neurocomputational system for relational map-making and navigation in visual environments. Robotics and Autonomous Systems. 16:1995;267-289.
2. Barto A.G., Sutton R.S. Landmark learning: An illustration of associative search. Biological Cybernetics. 42:1981;1-8.
3. V. Braitenberg, Vehicles, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1984.
4. Brown M.A., Sharp P.E. Simulation of spatial learning in the Morris water maze by a neural network model of the hippocampal formation and nucleus accumbens. Hippocampus. 5:1995;171-188.
5. Burgess N., Donnett J.G., Jeffery K.J., O'Keefe J. Robotic and neuronal simulation of the hippocampus and rat navigation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B. 352:1997;1535-1543.
6. Burgess N., Recce M., O'Keefe J. A model of hippocampal function. Neural Networks. 7:1994;1065-1081.
7. Cartwright B.A., Collett T.S. Landmark learning in bees. Journal of Computational Physiology A. 151:1983;521-543.
8. Chahl J.S., Srinivasan M.V. Visual computation of egomotion using an image interpolation technique. Biological Cybernetics. 74:1996;405-411.
9. Chahl J.S., Srinivasan M.V. Reflective surfaces for panoramic imaging. Applied Optics. 36(31):1997;8275-8285.
10. Chown E., Kaplan S., Kortenkamp D. Prototypes, location, and associative networks (PLAN): Towards a unified theory of cognitive mapping. Cognitive Science. 19:1995;1-51.
11. Collett T.S. Landmark learning and guidance in insects. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B. 337:1992;295-303.
12. Collett T.S., Dillmann E., Giger A., Wehner R. Visual landmarks and route following in desert ants. Journal of Computational Physiology A. 158:1986;835-851.
13. Collett T.S., Fry S.N., R.Wehner Sequence learning by honeybees. Journal of Computational Physiology A. 172:1993;693-706.
14. D. Coombs and K. Roberts, Centering behavior using peripheral vision, in: Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA, 1993, pp. 440-451.
15. A.P. Duchon, W.H. Warren, Robot navigation from a Gibsonian viewpoint, in: Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA, 1994, pp. 2272-2277.
16. Dyer F.C. Bees acquire route-based memories but not cognitive maps in a familiar landscape. Animal Behaviour. 41:1991;239-246.
17. Franz M.O., Schölkopf B., Mallot H.A., Bülthoff H.H. Learning view graphs for robot navigation. Autonomous Robots. 5:1998;111-125.
18. Franz M.O., Schölkopf B., Mallot H.A., Bülthoff H.H. Where did I take that snapshot? Scene-based homing by image matching. Biological Cybernetics. 79:1998;191-202.
19. C.R. Gallistel, The Organization of Learning, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1990.
20. Gaussier P., Zrehen S. Perac: A neural architecture to control artificial animals. Robotics and Autonomous Systems. 16:1995;291-320.
21. Gillner S., Mallot H.A. Navigation and acquisition of spatial knowledge in a virtual maze. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 10(4):1998;445-463.
22. Götz K.G. The optomotor equilibrium of the Drosophila navigation system. Journal of Computational Physiology. 99:1975;187-210.
23. Hangartner W. Spezifität und Inaktivierung des Spurpheromons von Lasius fuliginosus Latr. und Orientierung der Arbeiterinnen im Duftfeld. Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Physiologie. 57(2):1967;103-136.
24. B. Hassenstein, W. Reichardt, Systemtheoretische Analyse der Zeit-Reihenfolgen- und Vorzeichenauswertung bei der Bewegungsperzeption des Rüsselkäfers Chlorophanus, Zeitschrift für Naturforschung 11b (1956) 513-524.
25. Hoffmann G. The random elements in the systematic search behavior of the desert isopod, Hemilepistus reaumuri. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 13:1983;81-92.
26. Hoffmann G. The search behavior of the desert isopod Hemilepistus reaumuri as compared with a systematic search. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 13:1983;93-106.
27. J. Hong, X. Tan, B. Pinette, R. Weiss, E.M. Riseman, Image-based homing, in: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Sacramento, CA, 1991, pp. 620-625.
28. S.A. Huber, H.H. Bülthoff, Simulation and robot implementation of visual orientation behaviors of flies, in: R. Pfeifer, B. Blumberg, J.A. Meyer, S.W. Wilson (Eds.), From Animals to Animats 5, Proceedings of SAB'98, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1998, pp. 77-85.
29. D. Kortenkamp, T. Weymouth, Topological mapping for mobile robots using a combination of sonar and vision sensing, in: Proceedings of AAAI-94, Seattle, WA, 1994.
30. Krakauer D.C. Simple connectionist models of spatial memory in bees. Journal of Theoretical Biology. 172:1995;149-160.
31. A. Kühn, Die Orientierung der Tiere im Raum, Gustav Fischer, Jena, 1919.
32. B. Kuipers. A hierarchy of qualitative representations for space, in: Working Papers of the Tenth International Workshop on Qualitative Reasoning about Physical Systems (QR-96), AAAI Press, Menlo Park, CA, 1996.
33. B.J. Kuipers, Y. Byun, A robust, qualitative method for robot spatial learning, in: Proceedings of AAAI-88, St. Paul/Minneapolis, MN, 1988, pp. 774-779.
34. Kuipers B.J., Byun Y. A robot exploration and mapping strategy based on a semantic hierarchy of spatial representations. Robotics and Autonomous Systems. 9:1991;47-63.
35. Lambrinos D., Maris M., Kobayashi H., Labhart T., Pfeifer R., Wehner R. An autonomous agent navigating with a polarized light compass. Adaptive Behavior. 6:1997;131-161.
36. B. Leonard, B.L. McNaughton, Rat: Conceptual, behavioural and neurophysiological perspectives, in: R.P. Kesner, D.S. Olton (Eds.), Neurobiology of Comparative Cognition, Lawrence Erlbaum, New York, 1995, Chapter 13.
37. Levitt T.S., Lawton D.T. Qualitative navigation for mobile robots. Artificial Intelligence. 44:1990;305-360.
38. Lieblich I., Arbib M.A. Multiple representations of space underlying behavior. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 5:1982;627-659.
39. H.H. Lund, B. Webb, A robot attracted to the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus, in: P. Husbands, I. Harvey (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth European Conference on Artificial Life, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1997.
40. H. Mallot, H. Bülthoff, P. Georg, B. Schölkopf, K. Yasuhara, View-based cognitive map learning by an autonomous robot, in: F. Fogelman-Soulié, P. Gallinari (Eds.), Proceedings of ICANN'95 - International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks, Vol. II, EC2, Nanterre, France, 1995, pp. 381-386.
41. Mallot H.A. Behavior-oriented approaches to cognition: Theoretical perspectives. Theory in Biosciences. 116:1997;192-220.
42. Marr D. Simple memory: A theory of archicortex. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B. 176:1971;23-81.
43. M.J. Matarić, Navigating with a rat brain: A neurobiologically-inspired model for robot spatial representation, in: J.A. Meyer, S.W. Wilson (Eds), From Animals to Animats, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1991.
44. P.J. McKerrow, Introduction to Robotics, Addison-Wesley, New York, 1991.
45. McNaughton B.L., Barnes C.A., Gerrard J.L., Gothard K., Jung M.W., Knierim J.J., Kudrimoti H., Qin Y., Skaggs W.E., Suster M., Weaver K.L. Deciphering the hippocampal polyglot: The hippocampus as a path integration system. Journal of Experimental Biology. 199:1996;173-185.
46. B.L. McNaughton, L. Nadel, Hebb-Marr networks and the neurobiological representation of action in space, in: M.A. Gluck, D.E. Rumelhart (Eds.), Neuroscience and Connectionist Theory, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1990, pp. 1-64.
47. R. Möller, D. Lambrinos, R. Pfeifer, T. Labhart, R. Wehner, Modeling ant navigation with an autonomous agent, in: R. Pfeifer, B. Blumberg, J.A. Meyer, S.W. Wilson (Eds.), From Animals to Animats 5, Proceedings of SAB'98, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1998. pp. 185-194.
48. Muller R.U., Stead M., Pach J. The hippocampus as a cognitive graph. Journal of General Physiology. 107:1996;663-694.
49. Nakayama K., Loomis J.M. Optical velocity patterns, velocity-sensitive neurons, and space perception: a hypothesis. Perception. 3:1974;63-80.
50. Nelson R.C. Visual homing using an associative memory. Biological Cybernetics. 65:1991;281-291.
51. Neven H., Schöner G. Dynamics parametrically controlled by image correlations organize robot navigation. Biological Cybernetics. 75:1996;293-307.
52. O'Keefe J., Burgess N. Geometric determinants of the place fields of hippocampal neurones. Nature. 381:1996;425-428.
53. O'Keefe J., Dostrovsky J. The hippocampus as a spatial map. Preliminary evidence from unit activity in the freely moving rat. Brain Research. 34:1971;171-175.
54. J. O'Keefe, L. Nadel, The Hippocampus as a Cognitive Map, Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK, 1978.
55. C. Owen, U. Nehmzow, Landmark-based navigation for a mobile robot, in: R. Pfeifer, B. Blumberg, J.-A. Meyer, S.W. Wilson (Eds.), From Animals to Animats 5, Proceedings of SAB'98, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1998. pp. 240-245.
56. F. Papi, Animal Homing, Chapman & Hall, London, 1992.
57. Poggio T., Reichardt W. A theory of the pattern induced flight orientation of the fly Musca domestica. Kybernetik. 12:1973;185-203.
58. Poucet B. Spatial cognitive maps in animals: New hypotheses on their structure and neural mechanisms. Psychological Review. 100:1993;163-182.
59. Prescott T.J. Spatial representation for navigation in animats. Adaptive Behaviour. 4:1996;85-123.
60. Recce M., Harris K.D. Memory of places: A navigational model in support of Marr's theory of hippocampal function. Hippocampus. 6:1996;735-748.
61. T. Röfer, Controlling a robot with image-based homing, in: B. Krieg-Brückner, C. Herwig (Eds.), Kognitive Robotik, ZKW-Bericht 3/95, Center for Cognitive Sciences, Bremen, 1995.
62. T. Röfer, Controlling a wheelchair with image-based homing, AISB Workshop on Spatial Reasoning in Mobile Robots and Animals, Technical Report, UMCS-97-4-1, Department of Computer Science, Manchester University, 1997.
63. B. Ronacher, R. Wehner, Desert ants Cataglyphis fortis use self-induced optic flow to measure distances travelled, Journal of Computational Physiology A 177 (1995) 21-27.
64. R. Rothkegel, K.F. Wender, S. Schumacher, Judging spatial relations from memory, in: C. Freksa, C. Habel, K.F. Wender (Eds.), Spatial Cognition, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 1404, Springer, Berlin, 1998, pp. 79-105.
65. Samsonovich A., McNaughton B.L. Path integration and cognitive mapping in a continuous attractor neural network model. Journal of Neuroscience. 17:1997;5900-5920.
66. Santos-Victor J., Sandini G., Curotto F., Garibaldi S. Divergent stereo for robot navigation: A step forward to a robotic bee. International Journal of Computer Vision. 14:1995;159-177.
67. Schölkopf B., Mallot H.A. View-based cognitive mapping and path planning. Adaptive Behavior. 3:1995;311-348.
68. T. Sharpe, B. Webb, Simulated and situated models of chemical trail following in ants, in: R. Pfeifer, B. Blumberg, J.-A. Meyer, S.W. Wilson (Eds.), From Animals to Animats 5, Proceedings of SAB'98, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1998. pp. 195-204.
69. H.H. Shufeldt, G.D. Dunlap, Piloting and Dead Reckoning, Naval Institute Press, Annapolis, MD, 1991.
70. Srinivasan M.V. An image-interpolation technique for the computation of optic flow and egomotion. Biological Cybernetics. 71:1994;401-415.
71. M.V. Srinivasan, M. Lehrer, W.H. Kirchner, S.W. Zhang, Range perception through apparent image speed in freely-flying honeybees, Visual Neuroscience 6 (1991) 519-535.
72. Srinivasan M.V., Zhang S.W., Lehrer M., Collett T.S. Honeybee navigation en route to the goal: Visual flight control and odometry. Journal of Experimental Biology. 199:1996;237-244.
73. Sutherland R.J., Rudy J.W. Configural association theory: The role of the hippocampal formation in learning, memory, and amnesia. Psychobiology. 17:1989;129-144.
74. Thrun S. Learning metric-topological maps for indoor mobile robot navigation. Artificial Intelligence. 99:1997;21-71.
75. Tolman E.C., Ritchie B.F., Kalish D. Studies in spatial learning. I. Orientation and the short-cut. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 36:1946;13-24.
76. Trullier O., Wiener S.I., Berthoz A., Meyer J.-A. Biologically based artificial navigation systems: Review and prospects. Progress in Neurobiology. 51:1997;483-544.
77. Webb B. Using robots to model animals: A cricket test. Robotics and Autonomous Systems. 16:1995;117-134.
78. K. Weber, S. Venkatesh, M.V. Srinivasan, Insect inspired behaviours for the autonomous control of mobile robots, in: M.V. Srinivasan, S. Venkatesh (Eds.), From Living Eyes to Seeing Machines, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1997, pp. 226-248.
79. R. Wehner, The polarization vision project: Championing organismic biology, in: K. Schildberger, N. Elsner (Eds.), Neural Basis of Behavioural Adaptation, G. Fischer, Stuttgart, 1994, pp. 103-143.
80. Wehner R., Michel B., Antonsen P. Visual navigation in insects: Coupling of egocentric and geocentric information. Journal of Experimental Biology. 199:1996;129-140.
81. Wehner R., Srinivasan M.V. Searching behaviour of desert ants, genus Cataglyphis (Formicidae, Hymenoptera). Journal of Computational Physiology. 142:1981;315-338.
82. S. Werner, B. Krieg-Brückner, H.A. Mallot, C. Freksa, Spatial cognition: The role of landmark, route, and survey knowledge in human and robot navigation, in: W. Brauer (Ed.), Informatik'97. Informatik als Innovationsmotor, 27, Jahrestagung Gesellschaft für Informatik, Springer, Berlin, 1997.