Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast

European Journal of Radiology

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 208-219

  Helbich, Thomas H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

Author keywords

Breast neoplasms; Contrast agents; Diagnosis; MR imaging

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIA; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NONINVASIVE MEDICAL PROCEDURES; ONCOLOGY; PHARMACOKINETICS; TISSUE;

ANGIOGENESIS; BREAST NEOPLASM; BREAST TUMORS; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY;

MAMMOGRAPHY;

NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING AGENT;

BREAST CANCER; BREAST CARCINOMA; BREAST TUMOR; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; HUMAN; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MAMMOGRAPHY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; TISSUE PERFUSION;

EID: 0033861988     PISSN: 0720048X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0720-048X(00)00200-X     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Kopans D. Priorities for improved breast cancer imaging. Haus A.G.Y.M. A Categorical Course in Physics: Technical Aspects of Breast Imaging. 2nd edn:1993;RSNA.
2. Tohno E., Cosgrove D.O., Sloane J.P. Ultrasound Diagnosis of Breast Diseases. 1994;Churchill Livingstone, New York.
3. Heywang S.H., Wolf A., Pruss E., Hilbertz T.H., Eiermann W., Permanetter W. MR imaging of the breast with Gd-DTPA: use and limitations. Radiology. 171:1989;95-103.
4. Heywang-Köbrunner S.H., Beck R.B. Contrast-Enhanced MR Imaging of the Breast. 2nd edn:1995;Springer, Berlin.
5. Kaiser W., Zeitler E. MR imaging of the breast: fast imaging sequences with and without Gd-DTPA. Radiology. 170:1989;681-686.
6. Stack J.P., Redmond O.M., Codd M.B., Dervan P.A., Ennis J.T. Breast disease: tissue characterization with Gd-DTPA enhancement profiles. Radiology. 174(2):1990;491-494.
7. Gilles R., Guinebretière J.M. et al. Nonpalpable breast tumors: diagnosis with contrast-enhanced subtraction dynamic MR imaging. Radiology. 191:1994;625-631.
8. Gilles R., Meunier M., Lucidarme O., Zafrani B., Guinebretiere J.-M., Tardivon A.A. et al. Clustered breast microcalcifications: evaluation by dynamic contrast-enhanced subtraction MRI. JCAT. 20:1996;9-14.
9. Boetes C., Barentsz J.O., Mus R.D. et al. MR characterization of suspicious breast lesions with a Gadolinium-enhanced Turbo-FLASH subtraction technique. Radiology. 193:1994;777-781.
10. Harms S., Filamig D., Helsey K. MR imaging of the breast with rotating delivery of excitation off axis resonance: clinical experience with patologic correlation. Radiology. 187:1993;493-501.
11. Müller R., Barkhausen J., Sauerwein W., Langer R. Assessment of local recurrence after breast-conserving therapy with MRI. JCAT. 22:1998;408-412.
12. Chenevert T.L., Helvie M.A., Aisen A.M. et al. Dynamic three-dimensional imaging with partial K-space sampling: initial application for Gadolinium-enhanced rate. Characterization of breast lesions. Radiology. 196:1995;135-142.
13. Helbich T.H., Becherer A., Trattnig S. et al. Differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions: MR imaging versus Tc-99m sestamibi scintimammography. Radiology. 202:1997;493-499.
14. Hulka C.A., Edmister W.B., Smith B.L., Tan L., Sgroi D.C., Campbell T., Kopans D.B., Weisskoff R.M. Dynamic echo-planar imaging of the breast: experience in diagnosing breast carcinoma and correlation with tumor angiogenesis. Radiology. 205:1997;837-842.
15. Kelcz F., Santyr G.E., Cron G.O., Mongin S.J. Application of a quantitative model to differentiate benign from malignant breast lesions detected by dynamic, gadolinium-enhanced MRI. J. Magn. Res. Imag. 6:1996;743-752.
16. Kuhl C., Mielcareck P., Klaschnik S., Leutner C., Wardelmann E., Gieseke J. et al. Dynamik breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions? Radiology. 211:1999;101-110.
17. Fischer U., Kopka L., Grabbe E. Breast Carcinoma: effect of preoperative contrast-enhanced MR imaging on the therapeutic approach. Radiology. 213:1999;881-888.
18. Orel S.G., Schnall M.D., LiVolsi V.A., Troupin R.H. Suspicious breast lesions: MR imaging with radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiology. 190:1994;485-493.
19. Heywang S.H., Hilbertz T., Beck R., Bauer W.M., Eiermann W., Permanetter W. Gd-DTPA enhanced MR imaging of the breast in patients with postoperative scarring and silicon implants. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 14(3):1990;348-356.
20. Weidner N., Semple J., Welch W., Folkman J. Tumor angiogensis and metsasis - correlation in invasive breast carcinoma. New Engl. J. Med. 324:1991;1-8.
21. Weidner N., Folkman J., Pozza F., Pierantonio B., Allred E., Moore D., Meli S., Gasparini G. Tumor angiogenesis: a new significant and independent prognostic indicator in early-stage breast carcinoma. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 84(24):1992;1875-1887.
22. Heywang-Köbrunner S. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast. Invest. Radiol. 29(1):1994;94-104.
23. Buadu L.D., Murakami J., Murayama S., Hashiguchi N., Sakai S., Masuda K., Toyoshima S., Kuroki S. Breast lesions: correlation of contrast medium enhancement patterns on MR images with histopathologic findings and tumor angiogenesis. Radiology. 200:1996;639-649.
24. Buckley D., Drew P., Mussurakis S., Monson J., Horsman A. Microvessel density in invasive breast cancer assessed by dynamic Gd-DTPA enhanced MRI. J. Magn. Reson. Imag. 7:1997;461-464.
25. Dvorak HF. Leaky tumor vessels: consequences for tumor stroma generation and for solid tumor therapy. Prog Clin Biol Res 1990.
26. Dvorak H., Nagy J., Dvorak J., Dvorak A. Identification and characterization of the blood vessels of solid tumors that are leaky to circulating macromolecules. Am. J. Pathol. 133:1988;95-109.
27. Brasch R., Pham C., Shames D., Roberts T., van Dijke K., van Bruggen N., Mann J., Ostrowitzki S., Melnyk O. Assessing angiogenesis using macromolecular MRI contrast media. J. Magn. Reson. Imag. 7:1997;68-74.
28. Helbich T, Gossmann A, Huber S, Wendland M, Roberts T, Shames D, Rosenau W, Adachi M, Brasch R. Quantitative gadopentetate-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: testing of different analytic methods. ISMRI, Sydney, Australia: ISMRI, 1998.
29. Shames D., Kuwatsuru R., Vexler V., Mühler A., Brasch R. Measurement of capillary permeability to macromolecules by dynamic magnetic resonance imaging: a quantitative non-invasive technique. Magn. Reson. Med. 29:1993;616-622.
30. Tofts P., Brix G., Buckley D.L. et al. Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: standardized quantities and symbols. J. Magn. Reson. Imag. 10:1999;223-232.
31. Wiener J.I., Chako A.C., Merten C.W., Gross S., Coffrey E.L., Stein H.L. Breast and axillary tissue. MR imaging: correlation of signal intensities and relaxation times with pathologic findings. Radiology. 160:1986;299-305.
32. Müller-Schimpfle M., Ohmenhäuser K., Sand J., Stoll P., Claussen C.D. Dynamic 3D-MR mammography: is there a benefit of sophisticated evaluation of enhancement curves for clinical routine? J. Magn. Reson. Imag. 7:1997;236-240.
33. Kuhl C.K., Bieling H., Gieseke J., Ebel T., Mielcarek P., Far F., Folkers P., Elevelt A. Breast neoplasms: T2* susceptibility-contrast, first-pass perfusion MR imaging. Radiology. 202:1997;87-95.
34. Heywang-Köbrunner S., Beck R. Contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast. 2nd edn:1996;Springer, Berlin.
35. Kuhl C. MRI of the breast. Advances in MRI contrast 1998;5:56-69.
36. Daldrup H., Shames D.M., Wendland M., Okuhata Y., Link T.M., Rosenau W. et al. Correlation of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging with histologic tumor grade: comparison of macromolecular and small molecular contrast media. Am. J. Radiol. 171:1998;941-949.
37. Hochman M., Orel S., Powell C., Schnall M., Reynolds C., White L. Fibroadenomas: MR imaging appearances with radiologic-histopathologic correlation. Radiology. 204:1997;123-129.
38. van Dijke C., Brasch R., Roberts T., Weidner N., Mathur A., Shames D., Mann J., Schweikert H. Mammary carcinoma model: correlation of macromolecular contrast enhanced MR imaging characterizations of tumor microvasculature and histologic capillary density. Radiology. 198(3):1996;813-818.
39. Kelkar P., Helbich T., Becherer A., Rudas M., Lehner R., Mostbeck G. Solitary breast metastasis as the first sign of squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix: imaging findings. Eur. J. Radiol. 24:1997;159-162.
40. Gilles R., Zafrani B., Guinebretiere J.M. et al. Ductal carcinoma in situ: MR imaging-histopathologic correlation. Radiology. 196:1995;415-419.
41. Westerhof J., Fischer U., Moritz J., Oestmann J. MR imaging of mammographically detected clustered microcalcifications: is there any value? Radiology. 207:1998;675-681.
42. Helbich T., Mayr W., Schick S., Rudas M., Taucher S., Wagner T. et al. Coaxial technique: approach to breast core biopsies. Radiology. 203:1997;684-690.
43. Kuhl C., Bieling H., Gieseke J., Kreft B., Sommer T., Lutterbey G. et al. Healthy premenopausal breast parenchyma in dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: normal contrast medium enhancement and cyclical-phase dependency. Radiology. 203:1997;137-144.
44. Heywang-Köbrunner S., Heinig A., Pickuth D., Alberich T., Spielmann R. Interventional MRI of the breast: lesion localization and biopsy. Eur. Radiol. 10:2000;36-45.
45. Williams M., Pisano E., Schnall M., Fajardo L. Future directions in imaging of breast diseases. Radiology. 206:1998;297-300.