In lieu of required parking

Journal of Planning Education and Research

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 307-320

  Shoup, Donald C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CAR USE; INTERNATIONAL COMPARISON; TRANSPORTATION PLANNING; URBAN TRANSPORT;

EID: 0032858402     PISSN: 0739456X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0739456X9901800403     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Altshuler, A., and J. Gómez-Ibáñez. 1993. Regulation for Revenue. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.
2. American Automobile Manufacturers Association. 1998. AAMA Motor Vehicle Facts and Figures. Detroit, Mich.
3. Beverly Hills Planning Commission. 1992. Staff report. April 22. Beverly Hills, Calif.
4. Brown, J., D. Hess, and D. Shoup. 1998. Unlimited access. Working Paper, Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Los Angeles.
5. Chicago Regional Transportation Authority. 1998. Opportunity Costs of Municipal Parking Requirements. Prepared by Fish & Associates, K.T.
6. Analytics, and Vlecides-Schroeder Associates, Final Report, April 1998. Chicago, Ill.
7. Higgins, T. 1985. Flexible parking requirements for office developments: New support for public parking and ridesharing. Transportation 12:343-359.
8. Hu, P., and J. Young. 1992. Summary of Travel Trends, 1990 Nationwide Personal Transportation Survey. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Transportation, FHWAPL-92-027.
9. Kuhn, T. 1957. The Copernican Revolution. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
10. Planning Advisory Service. 1964. Off-Street Parking Requirements. Report # 182. Chicago, Ill.: American Planning Association.
11. Planning Advisory Service. 1971. An Approach to Determining Parking Demand. Report # 270. Chicago, Ill.: American Planning Association.
12. Planning Advisory Service. 1991. Off-Street Parking Requirements. Report # 432. Chicago, Ill.: American Planning Association.
13. Public Technology, Inc. 1982. Flexible Parking Requirements. Urban Consortium Information Bulletin, DOT-1-82-57. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Transportation.
14. Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority. 1997. Eco Pass Pilot Program Survey Summary of Findings. San Jose, Calif.
15. Shoup, D. 1995. An opportunity to reduce minimum parking requirements. Journal of the American Planning Association 61(1):14-28.
16. Shoup, D. 1997. Evaluating the effects of cashing out employer-paid parking: Eight case studies. Transport Policy 4(4):201-216.
17. Shoup, D., and M.J. Breinholt. 1997. Employer-paid parking: A nationwide survey of employers' parking subsidy policies. In The Full Social Costs and Benefits of Transportation, eds. D. Greene, D. Jones, and M. Delucchi, 371-385. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
18. Topp, H. 1993. Parking policies to reduce car traffic in German cities. Transport Reviews 13(1):83-95.
19. University of Washington Transportation Office. 1997. Stadium Expansion Parking Plan and Transportation Management Program: Draft 1997 Data Collection Summary. December 19. Seattle, Wash.
20. Weant, R., and H. Levinson. 1990. Parking. Westport, Conn.: Eno Foundation.
21. Willson, R. 1995. Suburban parking requirements: A tacit policy for automobile use and sprawl. Journal of the American Planning Association 61(1):29-42.