Are managed care plans organizing for quality?

Medical Care Research and Review

Volumn 57, Issue SUPPL. 2, 2000, Pages 9-32

  Scanlon, Dennis P ^a   Rolph, Elizabeth ^b   Darby, Charles ^c   Doty, Hilary E ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b RAND CORPORATION   (United States)

^c AGENCY FOR HEALTHCARE RESEARCH AND QUALITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH ECONOMICS; HEALTH MAINTENANCE ORGANIZATION; MANAGED CARE; PATIENT CARE; QUALITY CONTROL; REVIEW;

EID: 0033739357     PISSN: 10775587     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1077558700057002s02     Document Type: Review

References (36)

1. Physicians as leaders in improving health care: A new series in annals of internal medicine
2. Understanding the managed care backlash
3. The role of physicians in the future of quality management
4. A report card on continuous quality improvement
5. Executives with white coats - The work and world of managed-care medical directors
6. Executives with white coats - The work and world of managed-care medical directors
7. Early lessons from CAHPS demonstrations and evaluations
8. The impact of financial incentives on quality of health care
9. A national survey of the arrangements managed-care plans make with physicians
10. The effect of managed care on quality: A review of recent evidence
11. Exemplary quality improvement programs in HMOs
12. Quality management practices in medicaid managed care
13. Does managed care lead to better or worse quality of care?
14. A reply to Sullivan's reanalysis of managed care plan performance since 1980
15. What is influencing performance improvement in managed care?
16. The MC backlash - Introduction: Politics, misperceptions, or apropos?
17. Health plan accreditation: NCQA, JCAHO, or both?
18. Assessing the impact of continuous quality improvement on clinical practice: What it will take to accelerate progress
19. Why we need a patients' bill of rights
20. Managed care plan performance since 1980: Another look at 2 literature reviews
21. Sullivan responds
22. Differences in 4-year health outcomes for elderly and poor, chronically ill patients treated in HMO and fee-for-service systems
23. Promoting clinical involvement in hospital quality improvement efforts: The effects of top management, board, and physician leadership