Reversible dioxygen binding to hemerythrin. 1. Electronic structures of deoxy- and oxyhemerythrin

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Volumn 121, Issue 36, 1999, Pages 8277-8287

  Brunold, Thomas C ^a   Solomon, Edward I ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HEMERYTHRIN; OXYGEN;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL BINDING; ELECTRON TRANSPORT; NONHUMAN; OXYGEN AFFINITY; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; REACTION ANALYSIS; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS;

EID: 0033568346     PISSN: 00027863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ja990334s     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Feig, A. L.; Lippard, S. J. Chem. Rev. 1994, 94, 759.
2. Holm, R. H.; Kennepohl, P.; Solomon, E. I. Chem. Rev. 1996, 96, 2239.
3. Wallar, B. J.; Lipscomb, J. D. Chem. Rev. 1996, 96, 2625.
4. Stenkamp, R. E. Chem. Rev. 1994, 94, 715.
5. Logan, D. T.; Su, X.-D.; Åberg, A.; Regnström, K.; Hajdu, J.; Eklund, H.; Nordlund, P. Struct. Bonding (Berlin) 1996, 4, 1053.
6. Lindqvist, Y.; Huang, W.; Schneider, G.; Shanklin, J. EMBO J. 1996, 15, 4081.
7. Babcock, G. T.; Floris, R.; Nilsson, T.; Pressler, M.; Varortsis, C.; Vollenbrock, E. Inorg. Chim. Acta 1996, 243, 345.
8. (a) Wilkins, P. C.; Wilkins, R. G. Coord. Chem. Rev. 1987, 79, 195.
9. (b) Klotz, I. M.; Kurtz, D. M., Jr. Acc. Chem. Res. 1984, 17, 16.
10. (a) Reem, R. C.; Solomon, E. I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 8323.
11. (b) Reem, R. C.; Solomon, E. I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 1216.
12. Reem, R. C.; McCormick, J. M.; Richardson, D. E.; Devlin, F. J.; Stephens, P. J.; Musselman, R. L.; Solomon, E. I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 4688.
13. McCormick, J. M.; Reem, R. C.; Solomon, E. I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 115, 9066.
14. Niederhoffer, E. C.; Timmons, J. H.; Martell, A. E. Chem. Rev. 1984, 84, 137.
15. Solomon, E. I.; Baldwin, M. J.; Lowery, M. D. Chem. Rev. 1992, 92, 521.
16. Holmes, M. A.; Le Trong, I.; Turley, S.; Sieker, L. C.; Stenkamp, R. E. J. Mol. Biol. 1991, 218, 583.
17. Maroney, M. J.; Kurtz, D. M., Jr.; Nocek, J. M.; Pearce, L. L.; Que, L., Jr. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108, 6871.
18. Shiemke, A. K.; Loehr, T. M.; Sanders-Loehr, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 4951.
19. Gay, R. R.; Solomon, E. I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1978, 100, 1972.
20. Dawson, J. W.; Gray, H. B.; Hoenig, H. E.; Rossman, G. R.; Schredder, J. M.; Wang, R. H. Biochemistry 1972, 11, 461.
21. Kurtz, D. M., Jr. Chem. Rev. 1990, 90, 585.
22. 15 appear to indicate that this difference is less pronounced.
23. Sanders-Loehr, J.; Wheeler, W. D.; Shiemke, A. K.; Averill, B. A.; Loehr, T. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 8084.
24. Shiemke, A. K.; Loehr, T. M.; Sanders-Loehr, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108, 2437.
25. Clark, P. E.; Webb, J. Biochemistry 1981, 20, 4628.
26. Que, L., Jr.; True, A. E. In Progress in Inorganic Chemistry: Bioinorganic Chemistry; Lippard, S. J., Ed.; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1990; pp 97-200.
27. Tannor, D. J.; Heller, E. J. J. Chem. Phys. 1982, 77, 202.
28. Klotz, I. M.; Klotz, T. A.; Fiess, J. A. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1957, 68, 284.
29. Garbett, K.; Darnall, D. W.; Klotz, I. M.; Williams, R. J. P. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1969, 135, 419.
30. Zhang, J. H.; Kurtz, D. M., Jr.; Xia, Y.-M.; Debrunner, P. G. Biochemistry 1991, 30, 583.
31. χT curves.
32. Kennedy, B. J.; Murray, K. S. Inorg. Chem. 1985, 24, 1552.
33. Vermaas, A.; Groeneveld, W. L. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1974, 27, 583.
34. (a) Schachtschneider, J. H. Technical Report No. 57-65, Shell Development Co., Emeryville, CA, 1966.
35. (b) Fuhrer, H.; Kartha, V. B.; Kidd, K. G.; Krueger, P. J.; Mantsch, H. H. Computer Programs for Infrared Spectroscopy, Bulletin No. 15, National Research Council of Canada, 1976.
36. Zink, J. I.; Shin, K. S. K. Adv. Photochem. 1991, 16, 119.
37. Myers, A. B.; Mathies, R. A. In Biological Applications of Roman Spectroscopy; Spiro, T. G., Ed.; Wiley: New York, 1987; Vol. 2, pp 1-58.
38. (a) Baerends, E. J.; Ellis, D. E.; Ros, P. Chem. Phys. 1973, 2, 42.
39. (b) te Velde, G.; Baerends, E. J. Int. J. Comput. Phys. 1992, 99, 84.
40. Vosko, S. H.; Wilk, L.; Nusair, M. Can. J. Phys. 1980, 58, 1200.
41. Becke, A. D. J. Chem. Phys. 1986, 84, 4524.
42. Perdew, J. P. Phys. Rev. B 1986, 33, 8822.
43. H = 2.02, Fel-O-Fe2 = 110, and oxyHr, Fel-O = 1.85, Fe2-O = 1.88, Fe2-Oa = 2.00, Oa-Ob = 1.41, Fel-O-Fe2 = 125, Fe2-Oa-Ob = 116.
44. Versluis, L.; Ziegler, T. J. Chem. Phys. 1988, 88, 322.
45. The local coordinate systems on each Fe center are defined by the principal axes of the respective D tensors that were calculated as described. Neese, F.; Solomon, E. I. Inorg. Chem. 1998, 37, 6568.
46. Noodleman, L. J. Chem. Phys. 1981, 74, 5737.
47. The relative energies of the Fe d-based MOs (Figure 2, Table 2) and the corresponding LF excited states (Table 1) differ substantially, indicating that electronic relaxation effects upon excitation are important.
48. (a) Solomon, E. I.; Pavel, E. G.; Loeb, K. E.; Campochiaro, C. Coord. Chem. Rev. 1995, 144, 369.
49. (b) Pavel, E. G.; Kitajima, N.; Solomon, E. I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 3949.
50. Kurtz, D. M., Jr.; Shriver, D. F.; Klotz, I. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1976, 98, 5033.
51. Reem, R. C. Thesis, Stanford University, 1986.
52. Brunold, T. C.; Tamura, N.; Kitajima, N.; Moro-oka, Y.; Solomon, E. I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 5674.
53. 47 and oxo-bridged diferric complexes. Changing these values within reasonable limits did not significantly affect the fitted values of the other force constants.
54. -1, and the force constant obtained for the Fe-O stretch is k(Fe-O) = 3.00 mdyn/Å, indicating that the relatively low frequency of v(Fe-O) in oxyHr reflects a weak Fe-O bond. Czernuszewicz, R. S.; Sheats, J. E.; Spiro, T. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 26, 2063.
55. Wootton, J. L.; Zink, J. I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 1895.
56. Baldwin, M. J.; Root, D. E.; Pate, J. E.; Fujisawa, K.; Kitajima, N.; Solomon, E. I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 10421.
57. Brown, C. A.; Remar, G. J.; Musselman, R. L.; Solomon, E. I. Inorg. Chem. 1995, 34, 688.
58. Zhao, X. G.; Richardson, W. H.; Chen, J.-L.; Li, J.; Noodleman, L.; Tsai, H.-L.; Hendrickson, D. N. Inorg. Chem. 1997, 36, 1198.
59. McGrady, J. E.; Stranger, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 8512.
60. Hartman, J. R.; Rardin, R. L.; Chaudhuri, P.; Pohl, K.; Wieghardt, K.; Nuber, B.; Weiss, J.; Papaefthymiou, G. C.; Frankel, R. B.; Lippard, S. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 7387.
61. (a) Ros, P.; Schuit, G. C. A. Theor. Chim. Acta (Berlin) 1966, 4, 1.
62. (b) Van der Avoird, A.; Ros, P. Theor. Chim. Acta (Berlin) 1966, 4, 13.
63. Slater, J. C. The Calculation of Molecular Orbitals; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1979.
64. Root, D. E.; Mahroof-Tahir, M.; Karlin, K. D.; Solomon, E. I. Inorg. Chem. 1998, 37, 4838.
65. The coordinates of the Oa, Ob, μ-O, and H atoms were reoptimized with the remainder of the model kept frozen.
66. -1 arises from large antiferromagnetic coupling in the corresponding excited states and involves oxo p orbitals that are oriented perpendicular to the hydrogen bond in oxyHr and thus should not be strongly affected by this interaction.
67. Tuczek, F.; Solomon, E. I. Inorg. Chem. 1993, 32, 2850.
68. 62 exchange coupling arises from a net stabilization of the singlet ground state through second-order configuration interaction with metal-to-metal and double CT excited states.
69. Wieghardt, K. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1989, 28, 1153.