Manipulation in laparoscopic surgery: Overview of impeding effects and supporting aids

Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques - Part A

Volumn 9, Issue 6, 1999, Pages 469-480

  Breedveld, Paul ^a   Stassen, Henk G ^a   Meijer, Dirk W ^b   Jakimowicz, Jac J ^c  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^c CATHARINA HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HAND MOVEMENT; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LAPAROSCOPY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SURGICAL INSTRUMENT; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 0033403055     PISSN: 10926429     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/lap.1999.9.469     Document Type: Review

References (88)

1. Stassen HG, Dankelman J, Grimbergen CA, Meijer DW. Man-machine aspects of minimally invasive surgery. Proc 7th IFAC Symp Analysis, Design Evaluation Man-Machine Systems. Kyoto, Japan. Sept. 16-18, 1998, pp 7-18.
2. Breedveld P. Observation, manipulation, and eye-hand coordination problems in minimally invasive surgery. Proc 16th Eur Annu Conf Human Decision Making Manual Control. University of Kassel, Kassel, Germany. Dec. 9-11, 1997, pp 219-231.
3. Breedveld P. Observation, manipulation and eye-hand coordination in minimally invasive surgery: Overview of negative effects, experiments and supporting aids (Report N-510). Delft University of Technology, Faculty of Design, Engineering and Production, Man-Machine Systems and Control Group, 1998.
4. Eerdenburg N van. Endoscopic surgical apparatus with longitudinal actuation. US Patent Number 5,669,875. Sept. 23, 1997.
5. Boo M de. Operations with more feeling in the forceps. Delft Outlook 1997;(1):3-7.
6. Herder JL, Maase S, Voorhorst F, Sjoerdsma W, et al. Ergonomic handgrip for laparoscopic graspers (abstract). Min Invas Ther Allied Technol 1997;6:(supp 1):55.
7. Berguer R, Gerber S, Kilpatrick G, Beckley D. An ergonomic comparison of in-line vs pistol-grip handle configuration in a laparoscopic grasper. Surg Endosc 1998;12:805-808.
8. Cuschieri A. Shape of things to come: Expectations and realism. Surg Endosc 1994;8:83-85.
9. Cuschieri A. Whither minimal access surgery: Tribulations and expectations. Am J Surg 1995;169:9-19.
10. Treat MR. A surgeon's perspective on the difficulties of laparoscopic surgery. In: Taylor RH, Lavallée S, Burdea GC, Mösges R (eds): Computer Integrated Surgery: Technology & Clinical Applications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1996, pp 559-560.
11. Berguer R, Rab GT, Abu-Ghaida H, Alarcon A, Chung J. A comparison of surgeon's posture during laparoscopic and open surgical procedures. Surg Endosc 1997;11:139-142.
12. Tendick F, Jennings RW, Tharp G, Stark L. Sensing and manipulation problems in endoscopic surgery: Experiment, analysis, and observation. Presence 1993;2(1):66-80.
13. Tendick F, Jennings RW, Tharp G, Stark L. Perception and manipulation problems in endoscopic surgery. In: Taylor RH, Lavallée S, Burdea GC, Mösges R (eds): Computer Integrated Surgery: Technology & Clinical Applications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1996, pp 567-575.
14. Charles S, Williams RE, Hamel B. Design of a surgeon-machine interface for teleoperated microsurgery. Proc 11th Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biology Soc 1989.
15. Charles S, Das H, Ohm T, Boswell C, et al. Dexterity-enhanced telerobotic microsurgery. Proc 8th IEEE Int Conf Advanced Robotics (ICAR '97). Monterey, CA, July 7-9, 1997, pp 5-10.
16. Hunter IW, Doukoglou TD, Lafontaine SR, et al. A teleoperated microsurgial robot and associated virtual environment for eye surgery. Presence 1993;2(4):265-280.
17. Schenker PS, Das H, Ohm TR. A new robot for high dexterity microsurgery. Proc 1st Int Conf CVRMed'95. Nice, France, 1995, pp 115-122; also Ayache N (Ed): Computer Vision, Virtual Reality and Robotics in Medicine: Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1995.
18. Schenker PS, Das H, Ohm TR. A new robot for high dexterity microsurgery. Proc 1st Int Conf CVRMed'95. Nice, France, 1995, pp 115-122; also Ayache N (Ed): Computer Vision, Virtual Reality and Robotics in Medicine: Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1995.
19. Fischer H, Neisius B, Trapp R. Tactile feedback for endoscopic surgery. In: Morgan K, Satava RM, Sieburg HB, Mattheus R, Christensen JP (eds): Interactive Technology and the New Paradigm for Healthcare. IOS Press and Ohmsha, 1995, pp 114-117.
20. Kazi A, Raschke R. Evaluation of force feedback in medical tele-palpation. Proc 16th Eur Annu Conf Human Decision Making Manual Control. Kassel, Germany. Dec. 9-11, 1997, pp 232-241.
21. Schurr MO, Breitwieser H, Melzer A, et al. Experimental telemanipulation in endoscopic surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1996;6:167-175.
22. Schurr MO, Kunert W, Neck J, et al. Telematics and telemanipulation in surgery. Min Invas Ther Allied Technol 1998;7:97-103.
23. Bowersox JC, Shah A, Jensen J, et al. Vascular applications of telepresence surgery: Initial feasibility studies in swine. J Vasc Surg 1996;23:281-287.
24. Bowersox JC, Cordts PR, LaPorta AJ. Use of an intuitive telemanipulator system for remote trauma surgery: An experimental study. J Am Coll Surg 1998;186:615-621.
25. Green PS, Hill JW, Jensen JF, Shah AS. Telepresence surgery. IEEE Eng Med Biol Magazine May/June 1995:324-329.
26. Hill JW, Green PS, Jensen JF, Gorfu Y, Shah AS. Telepresence surgery demonstration system. Proc '94 IEEE Int Conf Robotics Automation. San Diego, CA, 1994;3:2302-2307.
27. Garcia-Ruiz A, Gagner M, Miller JH, Steiner CP, et al. Manual vs robotically assisted laparoscopic surgery in the performance of basic manipulation and suturing tasks. Arch Surg 1998;133:957-960.
28. Shennib H, Bastawisy A, Mack MJ, Moll FH: Computer-assisted telemanipulation: An enabling technology for endoscopic coronary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg 1998;66: 1060-1063.
29. Faraz A, Payandeh S. Synthesis and workspace study of endoscopic extenders with flexible stem. Trans Am Soc Mech Eng 1997;119:412-414.
30. Melzer A, Kipfmüller K, Halfar B: Deflectable endoscopic instrument DENIS. Surg Endosc 1997;11:1045-1051.
31. Hashimoto D. Development of Ojigi electrocautery and other Ojigi instruments. Min Invas Ther Allied Technol 1997;6:287-290.
32. Schurr MO, Melzer A, Dautzenberg P, et al. Development of steerable instruments for minimal invasive surgery in modular conception. Acta Chir Belgica 1993;93:73-77.
33. Fukuda T, Guo S, Kosuge K, et al. Micro active catheter system with multi degrees of freedom. Proc '94 IEEE Int Conf Robotics Automation. San Diego, CA, 1994;3:2290-2295.
34. Haga Y, Park K, Esashi M. Active catheter using polymer links (abstract). Min Invas Ther Allied Technol 1997;6(supp 1):56.
35. Ikuta K, Tsukamoto M, Hirose S: Shape memory alloy servo actuator system with electric resistance feedback and application for active endoscope. Proc IEEE Conf Robotics Automation. Tokyo, Japan, 1988, pp 427-430.
36. Ikuta K, Tsukamoto M, Hirose S. Shape memory alloy servo actuator system with electric resistance feedback and application for active endoscope. In: Taylor RH, Lavallée S, Burdea GC, Mösges R (eds): Computer Integrated Surgery: Technology & Clinical Applications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1996, pp 277-282.
37. Lim G, Minami K, Yamamoto K, et al. Multi-link active catheter snake-like motion. Robotica 1996;14:499-506.
38. Peirs J, Reynaerts D, Brussel H van. Shape memory micro-mechanisms for medical applications. Proc 8th IEEE Int Conf Advanced Robotics (ICAR'97). Monterey, CA. July 7-9, 1997, pp 155-160.
39. Sturges RH, Laowattana S. A voice-actuated, tendon controlled device for endoscopy. In: Taylor RH, Lavallée S, Burdea GC, Mösges R (eds): Computer Integrated Surgery: Technology & Clinical Applications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1996, pp 603-617.
40. Melzer A, Schurr MO, Lirici MM, et al. Future trends in endoscopic suturing. Endosc Surg 1994;2:78-82.
41. Wieneke P, Lutze T. Technologies for microendoscopes of the future: the MINOP project. Min Invas Ther Allied Technol 1998;7:233-239.
42. Mukherjee R, Minir M, Song G, Satava R. Optimisation of an articulated instrument for enhanced dexterity in minimally invasive therapy. Min Invas Ther Allied Technol 1998;7:335-342.
43. Mueglitz J. Räumliches Koppelgetriebe für Roboterhandgelenk. Berlin: Maschinenbautechnik 1988;37(7):296-298.
44. Mueglitz J. Roboterähnliche räumliche Führungsmechanismen. Berlin: Robotersysteme 1991;7(4):231-237.
45. Mueglitz J, Kunad G, Dautzenberg P, Neisius B, Trapp R. Kinematic problems of manipulators for minimally invasive surgery. Endosc Surg 1993;1:160-164.
46. Melzer A, Buess G, Cuschieri A. Instruments for endoscopic surgery. In: Taylor RH, Lavallée S, Burdea GC, Mösges R (eds): Computer Integrated Surgery: Technology & Clinical Applications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1996, pp 14-36.
47. Melzer A, Schurr MO, Dautzenberg P, Trapp R, Buess G. Erhöhung der Freiheitsgrade bei Instrumenten für die minimal invasive Chirurgie. Chirurg Forum Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1992, pp 279-285.
48. Melzer A, Schurr MO, Kunert W, et al. Intelligent surgical instrument system ISIS: Concept and preliminary experimental application of components and prototypes. Endosc Surg 1993;1:165-170.
49. Rininsland HH. Basics of robotics and manipulators in endoscopic surgery. Endosc Surg 1993;1:154-159.
50. Madhani AJ, Salisbury JK. Wrist mechanism for surgical instrument for performing minimally invasive surgery with enhanced dexterity and sensitivity. US Patent 5,797,900. Aug. 25, 1998.
51. Buess G. Update on clinical aspects and technology in endoscopic surgery. Endoscopy 1995;27:449-454.
52. Cuschieri A, Shimi S, Banting S, Velpen G van, Dunkley P. Coaxial curved instrumentation for minimal access surgery. Endosc Surg 1993;1:303-305.
53. Frank TG, Hanna GB, Cuschieri A. Technological aspects of minimal access surgery. Proc Inst Mech Eng 1997;211(H):129-144.
54. Löffler M, Trispel S. Technical aspects of curved instruments and flexible cannulae. Endosc Surg 1993;1:310-313.
55. Shimi SM. Access with flexible cannulae. Endosc Surg 1995;3:51-54.
56. Lazeroms M, Jonkind W, Honderd G. Telemanipulator design for minimally invasive surgery. Proc American Control Conf. Albuquerque, NM. June 1997, pp 2982-2986.
57. Sheridan TB. Human factors in telesurgery. In: Taylor RH, Lavallée S, Burdea GC, Mösges R (eds): Computer Integrated Surgery: Technology & Clinical Applications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1996, pp 223-229.
58. Gutt CN, Held S, Voepel H, Paolucci V. Instruments for gasless laparoscopic surgery. Min Invas Ther Allied Technol 1996;5:307-312.
59. Gutt CN, Daume JM, Linker R, Paolucci V. VarioLift retraction system for laparoscopy without pneumoperitoneum. Min Invas Ther Allied Technol 1998;7:241-245.
60. Nakamura H, Kobori Y, Goseki N, et al. Fishing-rod-type abdominal wall lifter for gasless laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 1996;10:944-946.
61. Paolucci V, Gutt CN, Schaeff B, Encke A. Gasless laparoscopy in abdominal surgery. Surg Endosc 1995;9: 497-500.
62. Champion JK, Hunter J, Trus T, Laycock W: Teaching basic video skills as an aid in laparoscopic suturing. Surg Endosc 1996;10:23-25.
63. Schippers E, Schumpelick V. Requirements and possibilities of computer-assisted endoscopic surgery. In: Taylor RH, Lavallée S, Burdea GC, Mösges R (eds): Computer Integrated Surgery: Technology & Clinical Applications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1996, pp 561-565.
64. Sjoerdsma W, Herder JL, Horward MJ, et al. Force transmission of laparoscopic grasping instruments. Min Invas Ther Allied Technol 1997;6:274-278.
65. 5 A 61 B 19/00. Sept. 9, 1993.
66. Foley JD, Dam A van, Feiner SK, Hughes JF. Computer Graphics: Principles and Practice. Addison-Wesley, 1990.
67. Kempkens W. Winzige Finger. Wirtschafts Woche, Jan. 19, 1995;(4):84-86.
68. Brett PN, Stone RSW. A technique for measuring contact force distribution in minimally invasive surgical procedures. Proc Inst Mech Eng 1997;211(H):309-316.
69. Cool JC, Hooreweder GJO van. Hand prosthesis with adaptive internally powered fingers. Med Biol Eng 1979;9:33-36.
70. Frank TG, Cuschieri A. Prehensile atraumatic grasper with intuitive ergonomics. Surg Endosc 1997;1036-1039.
71. Balázs M, Feussner H, Hirzinger G, Omote K, Ungeheuer A. A new tool for minor-access surgery: Replacing mechanical joints in laparoscopic forceps with elastic beams for improved pressure control and sensitivity. IEEE Eng Med Biol Magazine May/June 1998:45-48.
72. Herder JL, Horward MJ, Sjoerdsma W. A laparoscopic grasper with force perception. Min Invas Ther Allied Technol 1997;6:279-286.
73. Herder JL, Brinkman M, Sjoerdsma W, et al. Low friction forceps based on balanced springs (abstract). Min Invas Ther Allied Technol 1997;6(supp 1):55.
74. Herder JL, Boer KT den, Hoogendoorn M, Sjoerdsma W, et al. Evaluation of feedback in laparoscopic forceps (abstract). Min Invas Ther Allied Technol 1997;6 (supp 1):55.
75. Herder JL, Boer KT den, Sjoerdsma W. Design and evaluation of laparoscopic forceps with accurate force feedback. Proc 75th IFAC Symp Analysis, Design Evaluation Man-Machine Systems. Kyoto, Japan. Sept. 16-18, 1998, pp 567-571.
76. Herder JL, Horward MJ. Manipulating pliers. Int Patent Classification A61B 17/28, Int Publication Number WO 98/11833. March 26, 1998.
77. Kuntz JP. Rolling Link Mechanisms [PhD dissertation]. Delft University of Technology, Faculty of Design, Engineering and Production, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, Man-Machine Systems and Control Group, Delft, The Netherlands, 1995, ISBN 90-370-0126-2, 154 pp.
78. Kaczmarek KA, Webster JG, Bach-y-Rita P, Tompkins WJ. Electrotactile and vibrotactile displays for sensory substitution systems. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1991;38:1-16.
79. Dario P, Carrozza MC, Allotta B, Guglielmelli E. Micromechatronics in medicine. IEEE Trans Mechatronics 1996;1:137-148.
80. Dario P, Guglielmelli E, Allotta B, Carrozza MC. Robotics for medical applications. IEEE Robotics Autom Magazine Sept. 1996:44-56.
81. Tendick F, Sastry SS, Fearing RS, Cohn M. Applications of micromechanics in minimally invasive surgery. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatronics 1998;3:34-42.
82. Plinkert PK, Baumann I, Flemming E, Loewenheim H, Buess GF. The use of a vibrotactile sensor as an artificial sense of touch for tissues of the head and neck. Min Invas Ther Allied Technol 1998;7:111-115.
83. Rosen JM, Lasko-Harvill A, Satava R. Virtual reality and surgery. In: Taylor RH, Lavallée S, Burdea GC, Mösges R (eds): Computer Integrated Surgery: Technology & Clinical Applications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1996, pp 231-243.
84. Cuschieri A, Nathanson LK, Buess G. Basic surgical procedures. In: Cuschieri A, Buess G, Périssat J (eds): Operative manual of Endoscopic Surgery, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1992, pp 83-102.
85. Rossi M, Flexistap BC. A new flexible circular stapler for endoscopic surgery. Endosc Surg 1994;2:69-70.
86. Straface S. Single-patient-use laparoscopic instrumentation: A company perspective. Endosc Surg 1995;3:135-139.
87. Cuschieri A, Frank T. Slicer and tissue retrieval system for excisional endoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 1994;8:1246-1249.
88. Remorgida V. A new instrument for advanced laparoscopic surgery: A reusable bipolar forceps with grasping and cutting capacity. Min Invas Ther Allied Technol 1997;6:132-134.