Counterfactual thinking and decision making

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 6, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 570-578

  Roese, Neal ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; DECISION THEORY; HIGH RISK BEHAVIOR; HUMAN; MOTIVATION; REVIEW; THINKING;

DECISION MAKING; DECISION THEORY; HUMANS; MOTIVATION; RISK-TAKING; THINKING;

EID: 0033254963     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03212965     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. ANDERSON, C. A., LEPPER, M. R., & ROSS, L. (1980). Perseverance of social theories: The role of explanation in the persistence of discredited information. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 39, 1037-1047.
2. ARKES, H. R. (1991). Costs and benefits of judgment errors: Implications for debiasing. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 486-498.
3. BANDURA, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman.
4. BARON, J., & HERSHEY, J. C. (1988). Outcome bias in decision evaluation. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 54, 569-579.
5. BESCHLOSS, M. R. (1986). May-Day: Eisenhower, Khrushchev, and the U-2 affair. New York: Harper & Row.
6. BOLES, T. L., & MESSICK, D. M. (1995). A reverse outcome bias: The influence of multiple reference points on the evaluation of outcomes and decisions. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 61, 262-275.
7. BYRNE, R. M. J. (1997). Cognitive processes in counterfactual thinking about what might have been. In D. L. Medin (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 37, pp. 105-154). San Diego: Academic Press.
8. CROSBY, F. (1976). A model of egoistical relative deprivation. Psychological Review, 83, 85-113.
9. FERGUSON, N. (ED.) (1997). Virtual history: Alternatives and counterfactuals. London: Picador.
10. FILLENBAUM, S. (1974). Information amplified: Memory for counterfactual conditionals. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 102, 44-49.
11. FISCHHOFF, B. (1982). For those condemned to study the past: Heuristics and biases in hindsight. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky, (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 335-351). New York: Cambridge University Press.
12. FISCHHOFF, B., SLOVIC, P., & LICHTENSTEIN, S. (1977). Knowing with certainty: The appropriateness of extreme confidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 3, 552-564.
13. FOLGER, R., ROSENFIELD, D., RHEAUME, K., & MARTIN, C. (1983). Relative deprivation and referent cognitions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 172-184.
14. GILBERT, D. T. (1998). Ordinary personology. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed.; Vol. 2, pp. 89-150). New York: McGraw-Hill.
15. HARRIS, P. L., GERMAN, T., & MILLS, P. (1996). Children's use of counterfactual thinking in causal reasoning. Cognition, 61, 233-259.
16. HAWKINS, S. A., & HASTIE, R. (1990). Hindsight: Biased judgment of past events after the outcomes are known. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 311-327.
17. HEATH, C., LARRICK, R. P., & WU, G. (1999). Goals as reference points. Cognitive Psychology, 38, 79-109.
18. HIRT, E. R., & MARKMAN, K. D. (1995). Multiple explanation: A consider-an-alternative strategy for debiasing judgments. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 69, 1069-1086.
19. HOFSTADTER, D. R. (1979). Gödel, Escher, Bach: An eternal golden braid. New York: Vintage Books.
20. KAHNEMAN, D. (1992). Reference points, anchors, norms, and mixed feelings. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 51, 296-312.
21. KAHNEMAN, D. (1995). Varieties of counterfactual thinking. In N. J. Roese & J. M. Olson (Eds.), What might have been: The social psychology of counterfactual thinking (pp. 375-396). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
22. KAHNEMAN, D., & MILLER, D. T. (1986). Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives. Psychological Review, 93, 136-153.
23. KAHNEMAN, D., & TVERSKY, A. (1982). The simulation heuristic. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 201-208). New York: Cambridge University Press.
24. KAHNEMAN, D., & TVERSKY, A. (1984). Choices, values, and frames. American Psychologist, 39, 341-350.
25. KAHNEMAN, D., & VAREY, C. A. (1990). Propensities and counterfactuals: The loser that almost won. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 59, 1101-1110.
26. KORIAT, A., LICHTENSTEIN, S., & FISCHHOFF, B. (1980). Reasons for confidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 6, 107-118.
27. LEWIS, D. (1973). Counterfactuals. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
28. MARKMAN, K. D., GAVANSKI, I., SHERMAN, S. J., & MCMULLEN, M. N. (1993). The mental simulation of better and worse possible worlds. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 29, 87-109.
29. MCMULLEN, M. N. (1997). Affective contrast and assimilation in counterfactual thinking. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 77-100.
30. MEDVEC, V. H., MADEY, S. F. & GILOVICH, T. (1995). When less is more: Counterfactual thinking and satisfaction among Olympic athletes. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 69, 603-610.
31. MELLERS, B. A., SCHWARTZ, A., HO, K., & RITOV, I. (1997). Decision affect theory: Emotional reactions to the outcomes of risky options. Psychological Science, 8, 423-429.
32. MEYERS-LEVY, J., & MAHESWARAN, D. (1992). When timing matters: The influence of temporal distance on consumers' affective and persuasive responses. Journal of Consumer Research, 19, 424-433.
33. MILLER, D. T., & GUNASEGARAM, S. (1990). Temporal order and the perceived mutability of events: Implications for blame assignment. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 59, 1111-1118.
34. MILLER, D. T., & MCFARLAND, C. (1986). Counterfactual thinking and victim compensation: A test of norm theory. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 12, 513-519.
35. MILLER, D. T., & ROSS, M. (1975). Self-serving biases in the attribution of causalilty: Fact or fiction? Psychological Bulletin, 82, 213-225.
36. MORRIS, M. W., & LARRICK, R. P. (1995). When one cause casts doubt on another: A normative analysis of discounting in causal attribution. Psychological Review, 102, 331-355.
37. MORRIS, M. W., & MOORE, P. C. (1998). Learning from a brush with danger: Evidence that pilot learning from dangerous incidents is enabled by counterfactual thinking and hindered by organizational accountability (Working Paper No. 1492). Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
38. NASCO, S. A., & MARSH, K. L. (1999). Gaining control through counterfactual thinking. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 556-568.
39. NISBETT, R. E., & ROSS, L. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and short-comings of social judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
40. OLSON, J. M., & HAFER, C. L. (1996). Affect, motivation, and cognition in relative deprivation research. In R. M. Sorrentino & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: The interpersonal context (Vol. 3, pp. 85-117). New York: Guilford.
41. PFISTER, H. R., VAN DER PLIGT, J., & VAN DIJK, W. (1999). Temporal aspects of regret and disappointment and their impact on choice behavior. Manuscript submitted for publication.
42. ROESE, N. J. (1994). The functional basis of counterfactual thinking. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 66, 805-818.
43. ROESE, N. J. (1997). Counterfactual thinking. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 133-148.
44. ROESE, N. J., & MANIAR, S. D. (1997). Perceptions of purple: Counterfactual and hindsight judgments at Northwestern Wildcats football games. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 1245-1253.
45. ROESE, N. J., & OLSON, J. M. (EDS.) (1995). What might have been: The social psychology of counterfactual thinking. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
46. ROESE, N. J., & OLSON, J. M. (1996). Counterfactuals, causal attributions, and the hindsight bias: A conceptual integration. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 32, 197-227.
47. ROESE, N. J., & OLSON, J. M. (1997). Counterfactual thinking: The intersection of affect and function. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 29, pp. 1-59). San Diego: Academic Press.
48. SANNA, L. J., & TURLEY, K. J. (1996). Antecedents to spontaneous counterfactual thinking: Effects of expectancy violation and outcome valence. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 906-919.
49. SANNA, L. J., TURLEY-AMES, K. J., & MEIER, S. (1999). Mood, self-esteem, and simulated alternatives: Thought-provoking affective influences on counterfactual direction. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 76, 543-558.
50. SHAKLEE, H., & FISCHHOFF, B. (1982). Strategies of information search in causal analysis. Memory & Cognition, 10, 520-530.
51. SHERMAN, S. J., & MCCONNELL, A. R. (1996). The role of counterfactual thinking in reasoning. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10, S113-S124.
52. SPELLMAN, B. A. (1997). Crediting causality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 323-348.
53. SPELLMAN, B. A., & MANDEL, D. R. (1999). When possibility informs reality: Counterfactual thinking as a cue to causality. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8, 120-123.
54. STAW, B. M., MCKECHNIE, P. I., & PUFFER, S. M. (1983). The justification of organizational performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28, 582-600.
55. TAYLOR, S. E. (1991). Asymmetrical effects of positive and negative events: The mobilization-minimization hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 67-85.
56. TETLOCK, P. E. (1998). Close-call counterfactuals and belief system defense: I was not almost wrong but I was almost right. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 75, 639-652.
57. TETLOCK, P. E., & BELKIN, A. (EDS.) (1996). Counterfactual thought experiments in world politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
58. VALLONE, R. P., GRIFFIN, D. W., LIN, S., & ROSS, L. (1990). Overconfident prediction of future actions and outcomes by self and others. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 58, 582-592.
59. WASSERMAN, D., LEMPERT, R. O., & HASTIE, R. (1991). Hindsight and causality. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 30-35.
60. WELLS, G. L., & GAVANSKI, I. (1989). Mental simulation of causality. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 56, 161-169.
61. ZEELENBERG, M., & BEATTIE, J. (1997). Consequences of regret aversion 2: Additional evidence for effects of feedback on decision making. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 72, 63-78.
62. ZEELENBERG, M., VAN DIJK, W. W., VAN DER PLIGT, J., MANSTEAD, A. S. R., VAN EMPELEN, P., & REINDERMAN, D. (1998). Emotional reactions to outcomes of decisions: The role of counterfactual thinking in the experience of regret and disappointment. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 75, 117-141.