Direct posterior composite restorations with a new adhesive system: one-year results

Journal of Adhesive Dentistry

Volumn 1, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 167-173

  Schoch, Martin ^a   Kramer, Norbert ^a   Frankenberger, Ftoland ^a   Petschel, Anselm ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; HELIOBOND; MALEIC ACID DERIVATIVE; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; SYNTAC DENTINE ADHESIVE; SYNTAC SPRINT; TETRIC;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL SURGERY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MOLAR TOOTH; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PREMOLAR TOOTH; PROSPECTIVE STUDY;

ACRYLATES; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BICUSPID; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MALEATES; MOLAR; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RESIN CEMENTS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 0033233511     PISSN: 14615185     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Barnes DM, Blank LW, Thompson VP, Holston AM, Gingell JC. A 5- and 8-year clinical evaluation of a posterior composite resin. Quintessence Int 1991:22:141-143.
2. Dietschi D, Holz J. A clinical trial of four light-curing posterior composite resins: two-year report. Quintessence Int 1990; 21:965-975.
3. EI-Kalla IH, Garcia-Godoy F. Saliva contamination and bond strength of single-bottle adhesives to enamel and dentin. Am J Dent 1997:10:83-87.
4. Ferrari M, Goracci G, Garcia-Godoy F. Bonding mechanism of three one-bottle systems to conditioned and unconditioned enamel and dentin. Am J Dent 1997;10:224-230.
5. Frankenberger R, Krämer N, Oberschachtsiek H, Petschelt A. Dentin bond strength and marginal adaptation after NaOCI pre-treatment. Oper Dent, in press.
6. Freilich MA, Goldberg AJ, Gilpatrick RO, Simonsen RJ. Direct and indirect evaluation of posterior composite restorations at three years. Dent Mater 1992;8:60-64.
7. Goldberg AJ, Rydinge E, Santucci EA, Racz WB. Clinical evaluation of methods for posterior composite restorations. J Dent Res 1984:63:1387-1391.
8. Krejci l, Besek M, Lutz F. Clinical and SEM study of Tetric resin composite in posterior teeth: 12-month results. Am J Dent 1994;7:27-30.
9. Pelka M, Dettenhofer G, Reinelt C, Krämer N, Petschelt A. Validity and reliability of clinical criteria for adhesive inlay systems. Dtsch Zahnârztl Z 1994:49:921-925.
10. Raskin A, Michotte-Theall B, Vreven J, Wilson NHF. Clinical evaluation of a posterior composite 10-year report. J Dent 1999:27:13-19.
11. Ryge G, Cvar JF. Criteria for the clinical evaluation of dental restorative materials. United States Dental Health Center, US Government Printing Office, San Francisco 1971, publication 7902244.
12. Ryge G, Snyder M. Evaluating the clinical quality of restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 1973:87:369-377.
13. Ryge G, Jendresen MD, Glantz PO, Mjör I. Standardization of clinical investigators for studies of restorative materials. Swed Dent J 1981;5:235-239.
14. Scheibenbogen A, Manhart J, Kunzelmann K-H, Kremers L, Benz C, Hickel R. One-year clinical evaluation of composite fillings and inlays in posterior teeth. Clin Oral Invest 1997; 1:65-70.
15. Swift Jr El, Bayne SO. Shear bond strength of a new one-bottle dentin adhesive. Am J Dent 1997; 10:184-188.
16. Van Meerbeek B, Perdigao J, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. The clinical performance of adhesives. J Dent 1998;26:1-20.
17. Wilson NHF, Dünne SM, Gainsford ID. Current materials and techniques for direct restorations in posterior teeth. Part 2: Resin composite systems. Int Dent J 1998;47:185-193.
18. Wilson NHF, Wilson MA, Smith GA. A clinical trial of a new visible light-cured posterior composite restorative - initial findings and one-year results. Quintessence Int 1985;16: 281-290.
19. Wilson MA, Wilson NHF, Smith GA. A clinical trial of a visible light-cured posterior composite resin restorative: two-year results. Quintessence Int 1986;17:151-155.
20. Wilson NHF, Smith GA, Wilson MA. A clinical trial of a visible light-cured posterior composite resin restorative material: three-year results. Quintessence Int 1986;17:643-652.
21. Wilson NHF, Wilson MA, Wastell DG, Smith GA. A clinical trial of a visible light-cured posterior composite resin restorative material: five-year results. Quintessence Int 1988;19:675681.