Clinical Evaluation Methods for Posterior Composite Restorations

Journal of Dental Research

Volumn 63, Issue 12, 1984, Pages 1387-1391

  Goldberg, A J ^a,b   Rydinge, E ^b   Santucci, E A ^c   Racz, W B ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT HEALTH CENTER   (United States)

^c JOHNSON AND JOHNSON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BISPHENOL A BIS(2 HYDROXYPROPYL) ETHER DIMETHACRYLATE; BISPHENOL A GLYCIDYL METHACRYLATE; POLYMETHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; POLYURETHAN; RESIN;

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL SURGERY; HUMAN; PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE; STANDARD; SURFACE PROPERTY; TIME; UNITED STATES;

BISPHENOL A-GLYCIDYL METHACRYLATE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL MODELS; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; EVALUATION STUDIES; HUMAN; POLYMETHACRYLIC ACIDS; POLYURETHANES; SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TIME FACTORS; UNITED STATES; UNITED STATES PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE;

EID: 0021693649     PISSN: 00220345     EISSN: 15440591     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/00220345840630120901     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Dennison, J.B.; Powers, J.M.; and Charbeneau, G.T. (1980): Measurement of in vivo Wear on Posterior Composite Restorations, IADR Progr & Abst 59: No. 202.
2. Eick, J.D.; Ortman, L.F.; Allen, T.B.; and McGivern, R.F. (1973): General Clinical Application of a Stereo-Camera System, IADR Progr & Abst 52: No. 642.
3. Kusy, R.P. and Leinfelder, K.F. (1977): Pattern of Wear in Posterior Composite Restorations, J Dent Res 56: 544.
4. Labovitz, S. (1970): The Assignment of Numbers to Rank Order Categories, Amer Soc Rev 35: 515-524.
5. Lambrechts, P.; Ameye, C.; and Vanherle, G. (1982): Conventional and Microfilled Composite Resins. Part II. Chip Fracture, J Prosthet Dent 48: 527-538.
6. Leinfelder, K.F. (1983): Wear Patterns in Posterior Composite Resins, IADR Abst 62:No. S15.
7. Letzel, H.; Aardening, C.J.M.W.; Fick, J.M.; and Vrij-Hoef, M.M.A. (1977): Marginal Fracture of Amalgam Restorations versus Creep, IADR Progr & Abst 56: No. 245.
8. Mahler, D.B. and Marantz, R.L. (1979): The Effect of Time on the Marginal Fracture Behavior of Amalgam, J Oral Rehabil 6: 391-398.
9. Osborne, J.W.; Phillips, R.W.; Gale, E.N.; and Binon, P.P. (1976): Three-year Clinical Comparison of Three Amalgam Alloy Types Emphasizing an Appraisal of the Evaluation Methods Used, JADA 93: 784-789.
10. Phillips, R.W.; Avery, D.R.; Mehra, R.; Swartz, M.L.; and McCune, R.J. (1972): Observations on a Composite Resin for Class II Restorations: Two-year Report, J Prosthet Dent 28:164-169.
11. Powers, J.M.; Ryan, M.D.; Hosking, D.J.; and Goldberg, A.J. (1983): Comparison of in vitro and in vivo Wear of Composites, J Dent Res 62: 1089-1091.
12. Ryge, G. and Snyder, M. (1973): Evaluating the Clinical Quality of Restorations, JADA 87: 369-377.
13. Santucci, E.A. and Racz, W.B. (1982): One-year Evaluation of Posterior Restorations in a Primate Model, IADR Progr & Abst 61: No. 618.
14. Snedecor, G.W. and Cochran, W.G. (1967): Statistical Methods, 6th ed. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press.
15. Soderholm, K.-J. (1981): Degradation of Glass Filler in Experimental Composites, J Dent Res 60: 1867-1875.
16. Wu, W. and McKinney, J.E. (1982): Influence of Chemicals on Wear of Dental Composites, J Dent Res 61: 1180-1183.