A clinical trial of four light-curing posterior composite resins: Two-year report

Quintessence International

Volumn 21, Issue 12, 1990, Pages 965-975

  Dietschi, Didier ^a   Holz, Jacques ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACRYLIC ACID RESIN; COMPOSITE DENTAL RESIN; ESTILUX POSTERIOR; FORMULA F 70; P 30 COMPOSITE RESIN; P-30 COMPOSITE RESIN; POLYMETHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; POLYURETHAN; RESIN;

ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL SURGERY; HUMAN; MOLAR TOOTH; PREMOLAR TOOTH; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH DISEASE;

ACRYLIC RESINS; BICUSPID; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL LEAKAGE; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; ESTHETICS, DENTAL; HUMAN; MOLAR; POLYMETHACRYLIC ACIDS; POLYURETHANES; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 0025653366     PISSN: 00336572     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Erickson RL: Introductory remarks, in Vanherle G, Smith DC (eds): Jnternational Symposium on Posterior Composite Resin Dental Restorative Materials. St Paul, Minn, 3M Co, 1985, pp 15-18.
2. Langan DL, Fan PL, Hoos AA: The use of mercury in dentistry: a critical review of the recent literature. J Am Dent Assoc 1987;115:867-879.
3. Dodes JE: Amalgam toxicity: a review of the literature. Oper Dent 1988;13:32-36.
4. Vimy MJ, Lorscheider FL: Intraoral air mercury released from dental amalgam. J Dent Res 1985;64:1069-1071.
5. Duxbury AJ, Ead RD, McMurrough S, Watts DC: Allergy to mercury in dental amalgam. Br Dent J 1982;152:47-48.
6. Duxbury AJ, Watts DC, Ead RD: Allergy to dental amalgam. Br Dent J 1982;152:344-346.
7. American Dental Association, Council on dental materials, instruments and equipment: Obstacles to the development of a standard for posterior composite resins. J Am Dent Assoc 1989;118:649-651.
8. Mitchen JC: The use and abuse of aesthetic materials in posterior teeth. Jnt Dent J 1988;38:119-125.
9. Crabb HSM: The survival of dental restorations in a teaching hospital. Br Dent J 1981;150:315-318.
10. Paterson N: The longevity of restorations. Br Dent J 1984;157:23-25.
11. Osborne JW, Norman RD, Chew CL, et al: Clinical evaluation of 9 high copper amalgams: 13-year assessment. J Dent Res 1989;68(special issue):997 (abstr No. 1045).
12. Arthur J, Cohen M, Walter R, et al: Longevity of restorations in a U.S. navy population. J Dent Res 1989;68(special issue):904 (abstr No. 300).
13. Laswell HR, Timmons JH, Berry TG, et al: High copper amalgam restorations at 11 years. J Dent Res 1989;68(special issue):870 (abstr No. 27).
14. Doglia R, Herr, P, Hoiz J, et al: Clinical evaluation of four amalgam alloys: a five-year report. J Prosthet Dent 1986;56:406-415.
15. Allan DN: The durability of conservative restorations. Br Dent J 1969;126:172-177.
16. Mjor IA: A regulatory approach to the formulation of assessment criteria for posterior composite resins. Quintessence Int 1987;18:537-542.
17. Dietschi D, Ciucchi B, Holz J: A clinical trial of four light curing posterior composite resins: 9-month report. Quintessence Int 1989;20:641-652.
18. Wilson NHF, Wilson MA, Smith GA: A clinical trial of a new visible light-cured composite restorative - initial findings and one-year results. Quintessence Int 1985;16:281-290.
19. Wilson MA, Wilson NHF, Smith GA: A clinical trial of a visible light-cured posterior composite resin restorative: two-year results. Quintessence Int 1986;17:151-155.
20. Wilson NHF, Smith GA, Wilson MA: A clinical trial of a visible light-cured posterior composite resin restorative material: three-year results. Quintessence Int 1986;17:643-652.
21. Robinson AA, Rowe AHR, Maberley ML: A three-year study of the clinical performance of a posterior composite and a lathe cut amalgam alloy. Br Dent J 1988;164:248-252.
22. Tonn EM, Ryge G: Clinical evaluations of composite resin restorations in primary molars: a 4-year follow-up study. J Am Dent Assoc 1988;117:603-606.
23. Bishop BM: A three-year clinical evaluation of Heliomolar. J Dent Res 1988;67:689 (abstr No. 53).
24. Swijnenburg JT, Kortland PJ, Luxwolda RJ, et al: Clinical evaluation of four posterior composite resins: three-year report. J Dent Res 1988;67:689 (abstr No. 51).
25. Leinfelder KF: Current developments in posterior composite resins. Adv. Dent Res 1988;2:115-121.
26. Christensen R, Christensen G, Bangerter V: 3-year in-vivo comparison of 7 posterior resins with silver amalgam. J Dent Res 1987;66:211 (abstr No. 833).
27. Mitchem JC: 1-year Abrasion Results, Heliomolar. Unpublished data. University of Oregon, 1986. Cited in Heliomolar-product documentation, Schaan/Liechtenstein, Vivadent Inc.
28. Farah JW, Dougherty EW: Unfilled, filled and microfilled composite resins. Oper Dent 1981;6:95-99.
29. Leinfelder KF, Sockwell CL, Sluder TB: Two-year clinical evaluation of profile in posterior teeth. J Dent Res 1982;61 (special issue):215 (abstr No. 327).
30. Roulet J-F, Mettler P, Friedrich V: Studie über die Abrasion von Komposits im Seitenzahnbereich-Resultate nach 3 Jahren. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1980;35:493-497.
31. McComb D: Evaluation of clinical wear of posterior composites resins, in Vanherle G, Smith DC (eds): Jnternational Symposium on Posterior Composite Resin Dental Restorative Materials. St Paul, Minn, 3M Co, 1985, pp 511-520.
32. Lambrechts P, Braem M, Vanherle G: Accomplishments and expectations with posterior composite resins, in Vanherle G, Smith DC (eds): Jnternational Symposium on Posterior Composite Resin Dental Restorative Materials. St Paul, Minn, 3M Co., 1985, pp 521-540.
33. Roulet J-F: Degradation of Dental Polymers. Habilitationsschrift zur Erlangung der Venia Legendi der Medizinischen Fakultät, University of Zürich, 1985.
34. Groeningen G, Jongebloed W, Arends I: Composite resins after IW years of in vivo abrasion. An SEM investigation. Quintessence Int 1985;16:253-258.
35. Amsberry W, Fraunhofer JA, Hoots J, et al: Marginal leakage of several acid-etch composite resin restorative systems. J Prosthet Dent 1984;52:647-653.
36. Luescher B, Lutz F, Ochsenbein H, et al: Microleakage and marginal adaptation in conventional and adhesive Class II restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1977;37:300-309.
37. Krejci I, Lutz F, Krejci D: The influence of different base materials on marginal adaptation and wear of conventional Class II composite resin restorations. Quintessence Int 1988;19:191-198.
38. Craig RG: Dental Restorative Materials. St Louis, CV Mosby Co, 1989, pp 64-112.
39. Fukushima M, Setcos JC, Phillips RW: Marginal fracture of posterior composite resins. J Am Dent Assoc 1988;117:577-583.
40. Wilson NHF, Wilson MA, Smith GA: A clinical trial of a visible light cured posterior composite resin restorative material: four-year results. Quintessence Int 1988;19:133-139.
41. Wilson NHF, Wilson MA, Wastell DG, et al: A clinical trial of a visible light cured posterior composite resin restorative material: five-year results. Quintessence Int 1988;19:675-681.
42. Darbyshire PA, Messer LB, Douglas WH: Microleakage in Class 11 composite restorations bonded to dentin using thermal and load cycling. J Dent Res 1988;67:585-587.
43. Zidan O, Gomez-Marin O, Tsuchiya T: A comparative study of the effects of dentinal bonding agents and application techniques on marginal gaps in Class V cavities. J Dent Res 1987;66:716-721.