National survey of school psychologists regarding use of dynamic assessment and other nontraditional assessment techniques

Psychology in the Schools

Volumn 36, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 295-304

  Haney, Michelle R ^b   Evans, J Gary ^a  

^a GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033164044     PISSN: 00333085     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6807(199907)36:4<295::AID-PITS3>3.0.CO;2-G     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. American Counseling Association. (1995). The code of ethics and standards of practice, Alexandria, VA: Author.
2. American Psychological Association. (1992). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologist, 47, 1597-1611.
3. American Psychological Association. (1993). Guidelines for providers of psychological services to ethnic, linguistic, and culturally diverse populations. American Psychologist, 48, 45-48.
4. Armour-Thomas E. (1992). Intellectual assessment of children from culturally diverse backgrounds. School Psychology Review, 21, 552-565.
5. Artiles, A.J., & Trent, S.C. (1994). Overrepresentation of minority students in special education: A continuing debate. The Journal of Special Education, 27, 410-437.
6. Batsche, G.M., & Knoff, H.M. (1995). Linking assessment to intervention. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best Practices in School Psychology-III (pp.569-585), Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists.
7. Daniel, M.H. (1997). Intelligence testing status and trends. American Psychologist, 52, 1038-1045.
8. Day, J.D., Engelhardt, J.L., Maxwell, S.E., & Bolig, E.E. (1997). Comparison of static and dynamic assessment procedures and their relation to independent performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 358-368.
9. Duran, R.P.(1989). Assessment and instruction of at-risk Hispanic students. Exceptional Children, 56, 154-158.
10. Figueroa, R.A. (1990). Assessment of linguistic minority group children. In C.R. Reynolds & R.W. Kamphaus (Eds.), Handbook of psychological & educational assessment of children. Intelligence & achievement (pp.671-696), New York: The Guilford Press.
11. Gersten, R., & Woodward, J. (1994). The language-minority student and special education: Issues, trends, and paradoxes. Exceptional Children, 60, 310-322.
12. Gopaul-McNicol, S.A. (1997). A theoretical framework for training monolingual school psychologists to work with multilingual/multicultural children: An exploration of the major competencies. Psychology In the Schools, 34, 17-29.
13. Gresham, F.M., & Witt, J.C. (1997). Utility of intelligence tests for treatment planning, classification, and placement decisions: Recent empirical findings and future directions. School Psychology Quarterly, 12, 249-267.
14. Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. S 602 et seq. (1997).
15. Jitendra, A.K., & Rohena-Diaz, E. (1996). Language assessment of students who are linguistically diverse: Why a discrete approach is not the answer. School Psychology Review, 25, 40-56.
16. Lidz, C.S. (1991). Practitioner's guide to dynamic assessment (pp. 3-20), New York: The Guilford Press.
17. Lidz, C.S. (1992). The extent of incorporation of dynamic assessment into cognitive assessment courses: A national survey of school psychology trainers. The Journal of Special Education, 26, 325-331.
18. Lidz, C.S. (1995). Dynamic assessment and the legacy of L.S. Vygotsky. School Psychology International, 16, 143-153.
19. Lidz, C.S. (1997, June). Dynamic assessment: Restructuring the role of school psychologists. Communiqué, 5, 22.
20. Lopez, E.C. (1995). Working with bilingual children. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes, (Eds.), Best Practices in School Psychology-III (pp.1111-1121), Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists.
21. Macmann, G.M., & Barnett, D.W. (1997). Myth of the master detective: Reliability of interpretations for Kaufman's "intelligent testing" approach to the WISC-III. School Psychology Quarterly, 12, 197-234.
22. McDermott, P.A., & Glutting, J.J. (1997). Informing stylistic learning behavior, disposition, and achievement through abili-ty subtests - or, more illusion of meaning? School Psychology Review, 26, 163-175.
23. National Association of School Psychologists. (1997). Professional Conduct Manual, Bethesda, Maryland: NASP Publications.
24. Pena, E., Quinn, R., & Iglesias, A. (1992). The application of dynamic methods to language assessment: A nonbiased procedure. The Journal of Special Education, 26, 269-280.
25. Poplin, M., & Phillips, L. (1993). Sociocultural aspects of language and literacy: Issues facing educators of students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 16, 245-255.
26. Reschly, D.J., & Ysseldyke, J.E. (1995). School psychology paradigm shift. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best Practices in School Psychology-III (pp.17-31), Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists.
27. Rutland, A., & Campbell, R. (1995). The validity of dynamic assessment methods for children with learning difficulties and nondisabled children. Journal of Cognitive Education, 5,81-94.
28. Sattler, J.M. (1988). Assessment of children (3rd ed.), New York: Jerome M. Sattler, Publisher.
29. Schiff-Myers, N.B. (1992). Considering arrested language development and language loss in the assessment of second language learners. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 23, 28-33.
30. Shapiro, E.S., & Eckert, T.L. (1994). Acceptability of curriculum-based assessment by school psychologists. Journal of School Psychology, 32, 167-183.
31. Thomas, A. (1997, November). "Functional assessment" - not something new. Communiqué, 26, 5.
32. Thomas, A., & Grimes, J. (Eds.). (1995). Best practices in school psychology-III, Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists.
33. Wilson, M.S., & Reschly, D.J. (1996). Assessment in school psychology training and practice. School Psychology Review, 25, 9-23.