Mechanisms of genomic imprinting

Current Opinion in Genetics and Development

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 164-170

  Brannan I, Camilynn ^a   Bartolomei, Marisa S ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DNA; DNA METHYLTRANSFERASE;

ALLELE; DNA METHYLATION; GENE CLUSTER; GENETIC LINKAGE; GENOME IMPRINTING; HAPPY PUPPET SYNDROME; PRADER WILLI SYNDROME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW;

MAMMALIA;

EID: 0033118916     PISSN: 0959437X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0959-437X(99)80025-2     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Barlow DP: Competition - A common motif for the imprinting mechanism. EMBO J 1997, 16:6899-6905.
2. Bartolomei MS, Tilghman SM: genomic imprinting in mammals. Annu Rev Genet 1997, 31:493-525.
3. Reik W, Walter J: Imprinting mechanisms in mammals. Curr Opin Genet Dev 1998, 8:154-164.
4. Surani MA: Imprinting and the initiation of gene silencing in the germline. Cell 1998, 93:309-312.
5. Constância M, Pickard B, Kelsey G, Reik W: Imprinting mechanisms. Genet Res 1998, 8:881-900. An excellent and comprehensive review by leaders in the field of imprinting.
6. Kip2 is activated, and Kvlqt1 is silenced.
7. Li E, Beard C, Jaenisch R: Role For DNA methylation in genomic imprinting. Nature 1993, 366:362-365.
8. Shemer R, Birger Y, Riggs AD, Razin A: Structure of the imprinted mouse Snrpn gene and establishment of its Parental-Specific Methylation Pattern. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997, 94:10267-10272.
9. Tate P, Skarnes W, Bird A: The methyl-CpG binding protein MeCP2 is essential for embryonic development in the mouse. Nat Genet 1996, 12:205-208.
10. Jones PL, Veenstra GJC, Wade PA, Vermaak D, Kass SU, Landsberger N, Strouboulis J, Wolffe AP: Methylated DNA and MeCP2 recruit histone deacetylase to repress transcription. Nat Genet 1998, 19:187-191. To investigate the association between CpG methylation and gene silencing in vertebrates, proteins that cofractionated with the methyl-CpG binding protein, MeCP2, were isolated using Xenopus oocyte extracts. Sin3 and histone deacetylase - both of which are presumed to repress gene activity by modifying chromatin structure - were identified, suggesting that MeCP2 recruits the Sin3/histone deacetylase complex to promoters, thereby leading to gene silencing.
11. Nan X, Ng H-H, Johnson CA, Laherty CD, Turner BM, Eisenman RN, Bird A: Transcriptional repression by the methyl-CpG-binding protein MeCP2 involves a histone deacetylase complex. Nature 1998, 393:386-389. See [10••]. Sin3, histone deacetylase and MeCP2 interact in mammalian extracts as assayed by co-immunoprecipitation.
12. Brandeis M, Kafri T, Ariel M, Chaillet JR, McCarrey J, Razin A, Cedar H: The ontogeny of allele-specific methylation associated with imprinted genes in the mouse. EMBO J 1993, 12:3669-3677.
13. Szabo PE, Mann JR: Biallelic expression of imprinted genes in the mouse germ line: Implications for erasure, establishment, and mechanisms of genomic imprinting. Genes Dev 1995, 9:1857-1868.
14. Tada M, Tada T, Lefebvre L, Barton SC, Surani MA: Embryonic germ cells induce epigenetic reprogramming of somatic nucleus in hybrid cells. EMBO J 1997, 16:6510-6520.
15. Bestor TH, Laudano A, Mattaliano R, Ingram V: Cloning and sequencing of a cDNA encoding DNA methyltransferase of mouse cells. The carboxyl-terminal domain of the mammalian enzyme is related to bacterial restriction methyltransferases. J Mol Biol 1988, 203:971-983.
16. Yoder JA, Soman NS, Verdine GL, Bestor TH: DNA (cytosine-5)-Methyltransferases in mouse cells and tissues. Studies with a mechanism-based probe. J Mol Biol 1997, 270:385-395.
17. Yoder JA, Bestor TH: A candidate mammalian DNA methyltransferase related to pmt1 p of fission yeast. Hum Mol Genet 1998, 7:279-284.
18. Okano M, Xie S, Li E: Cloning and characterization of a family of novel mammalian DNA (cytosine-5) methyltransferases. Nat Genet 1998, 19:219-220.
19. Okano M, Xie S, Li E: Dnmt2 is not required for de novo and maintenance methylation of viral DNA in embryonic stem cells. Nucleic Acids Res 1998, 26:2536-2540.
20. Mertineit C, Yoder JA, Taketo T, Laird DW Trasler JM, Bestor TH: sex-specific exons control DNA methyltransferase in mammalian germ cells. Development 1998, 125:889-897. Dnmt1, the predominant maintenance and de novo DNA methyltransferase in mammals, undergoes alternative sex-specific splicing of the 5′ exons. Whereas the pachytene spermatocyte-specific exon interferes with translation of Dnmt1, the oocyte-specific exon produces an amino-terminal truncated protein that is highly expressed at later stages of oocyte growth. The oocyte-specific form of Dnmt1 is an excellent candidate for conferring the maternal-specific pattern of methylation.
21. Stöger R, Kubicka P, Liu C-G, Kafri T, Razin A, Cedar H, Barlow DP: maternal-specific methylation of the imprinted mouse Igf2r locus identifies the expressed locus as carrying the imprinting signal. Cell 1993, 73:61-71.
22. Kono T, Obata Y, Yoshimzu T, Nakahara T, Carroll H: Epigenetic modifications during oocyte growth correlates with extended parthenogenetic development in the mouse. Nat Genet 1996, 13:91-94.
23. kip2 [6••].
24. Kimura Y, Yanagimachi R: mouse oocytes injected with testicular spermatozoa or round spermatids can develop into normal offspring. Development 1995, 121:2397-2405.
25. Kimura Y, Tateno H, Handel MA, Yanagimachi R: Factors affecting meiotic and developmental competence of primary spermatocyte nuclei injected into mouse oocytes. Biol Reprod 1998, 59:871-877. The authors report that, upon injection of mature oocytes with primary spermatocyte nuclei, 9 full-term offspring were obtained from 590 normal-looking two-cell embryos transferred to pseudopregnant females. Four of these offspring survived to maturity and proved to be fertile, indicating that the paternal-specific imprint is therefore established prior to meiosis in most spermatocytes.
26. Ogura A, Suzuki O, Tanemura K, Mochida K, Kobayashi Y, Matsuda J: Development of normal mice from metaphase I oocytes fertilized with primary spermatocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998, 95:5611-5615. The authors report that oocytes fertilized with primary spermatocytes produced 3 full-term offspring from 90 preimplantation embryos, indicating that the paternal-specific genomic imprint may be set prior to meiosis.
27. Bartolomei MS, Tilghman SM: Parental imprinting of mouse chromosome 7. Semin Dev Biol 1992, 3:107-117.
28. Wutz A, Smrzka OW, Schweifer N, Schellander K, Wagner EF, Barlow DP: Imprinted expression of the Igf2r gene depends on an intronic CpG island. Nature 1997, 389:745-749.
29. Paulsen M, Davies KR, Bowden LM, Villar AJ, Franck O, Dean WL, Moore TF, Rodrigues N, Davies KE, Hu R-J et al.: Syntenic organization of the mouse distal chromosome 7 imprinting cluster and the Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome region in chromosome 11p15.5. Hum Mol Genet 1998, 7:1149-1159. A 1 Mb physical map of the imprinting cluster on mouse distal chromosome 7 is reported. The imprinting status of Kcnq1 (also called Kvlqt1) and expression of Nap1l4 are also described.
30. Leighton PA, Saam JR, Ingram RS, Stewart CL, Tilghman SM: An enhancer deletion affects both H19 and Igf2 expression. Genes Dev 1995, 9:2079-2089.
31. Leighton PA, Ingram RS, Eggenschwiler J, Efstratiadis A, Tilghman SM: Disruption of imprinting caused by deletion of the H19 gene region in mice. Nature 1995, 375:34-39.
32. Jones BK, Levorse JM, Tilghman SM: Igf2 imprinting does not require its own DNA methylation or H19 RNA. Genes Dev 1998, 12:2200-2207. The mechanism by which Igf2 is imprinted is here investigated using a series of mutations. Replacement of the endogenous H19 gene by the luciferase gene had no effect on Igf2 imprinting, indicating that the H19 RNA is not required. Although paternally-derived luciferase was expressed inconsistently, Igf2 expression was not affected, suggesting that the two genes are not regulated by a strict competition of the promoters for the H19 endodermal enhancers. Finally, the Igf2 paternal allele-specific methylation proposed to be important for Igf2 expression may not be required in embryos as Igf2 activation caused by the large H19 deletion is not disrupted in Dnmt1-deficient mice.
33. Tremblay KD, Duran KL, Bartolomei MS: A 5′ 2-kilobase-pair region of the imprinted mouse H19 gene exhibits exclusive paternal methylation throughout development. Mol Cell Biol 1997, 17:4322-4329.
34. Thorvaldsen JL, Duran KL, Bartolomei MS: Deletion of the H19 differentially methylated domain results in loss of imprinted expression of H19 and Igf2. Genes Dev 1998, 12:3693-3702. To assess the role of a 2 kb region of paternal-specific methylation that is located 2 kb upstream from the start of H19 transcription, a deletion was generated at the endogenous locus. As expected, when the mutation was paternally transmitted, H19 was activated and Igf2 expression was reduced. Surprisingly, maternal transmission of the deletion led to a reduction in H19 expression and activation of Igf2, indicating that this element positively influences H19 expression and/or inhibits Igf2 expression.
35. Hark AT, Tilghman SM: Chromatin conformation of the H19 epigenetic mark. Hum Mol Genet 1998, 7:1979-1985. The chromatin structure of the H19 upstream region is here analyzed using nuclease hypersensitivity. The maternal allele was found to be hypersensitive in two distinct regions that flank the H19 differentially methylated region, suggesting that chromatin structure may be involved in silencing of the linked Igf2 gene.
36. Szabo PE, Pfeifer GP, Mann JR: Characterization of novel parent-Specific epigenetic modifications upstream of the imprinted mouse H19 gene. Mol Cell Biol 1998, 18:6767-6776.
37. Webber AL, Ingram RS, Levorse JM, Tilghman SM: Location of enhancers is essential for the imprinting of H19 and Igf2 genes. Nature 1998, 391:711-715. To test the hypothesis that the regulation of H19 and Igf2 imprinting is governed by a competition of the promoters for a common set of enhancers, mice that contained an extra set of enhancers and mice in which the enhancers were moved from their normal location were generated. Mice harboring a duplicated set of enhancers on the maternal chromosome expressed the maternal allele of Igf2. When the enhancers were moved from their normal location to a point between H19 and Igf2 on the maternally-derived chromosome, Igf2 was expressed, thereby reversing the direction of the imprint. The investigators conclude that H19 promoter strength alone is not sufficient to silence Igf2.
38. Kellum R, Schedl P: A group of scs elements function as domain boundaries in an enhancer-blocking assay. Mol Cell Biol 1992, 12:2424-2431.
39. Jiang Y-H, Tsai T-F, Bressler J, Beaudet AL: Imprinting in angelman and Prader-Willi Syndromes. Curr Opin Genet Dev 1998, 8:334-342. An insightful and up-to-date review from a laboratory that has made numerous valuable contributions to the PWS/AS field.
40. Nicholls RD, Saitoh S, Horsthemke B: Imprinting in prader-willi and angelman syndromes. Trends Genet 1998, 14:194-200. An excellent review from the two most active laboratories (those of Nicholls and Horsthemke) in PWS/AS research, who have led the way in understanding the imprinting center.
41. Yang T, Adamson TE, Resnick JL, Leff S, Wevrick R, Francke U, Jenkins NA, Copeland NG, Brannan CI: A mouse model for Prader-Willi syndrome imprinting-centre mutations. Nat Genet 1998, 19:25-31. This publication demonstrates that PWS-IC is functionally conserved between mouse and human. Paternal transmission of a PWS-IC deletion results in the lack of paternal gene expression and perinatal lethality. This report also shows that inactivating mutations of Snrpn do not cause an obvious phenotypic abnormality in the mouse.
42. Reis A, Dittrich B, Greger V, Buiting K, Lalande M, GIllessen-Kaesbach G, Anvret M, Horsthemke B: Imprinting mutations suggested by abnormal DNA methylation patterns in familial angelman and Prader-Willi syndromes. Am J Hum Genet 1994, 54:741-747.
43. Buiting K, Saitoh S, Gross S, Dittrich B, Schwartz S, Nicholls RD, Horsthemke B: Inherited microdeletions in the angelman and Prader-Willi Syndromes Define an Imprinting Centre on Human Chromosome 15. Nat Genet 1995, 9:395-400.
44. Saitoh S, Buiting K, Rogan PK, Buxton JL, Driscoll DJ, Arnemann J, Konig R, Malcolm S, Horsthemke B, Nicholls RD: Minimal definition of the imprinting center and fixation of a chromosome 15q11-q13 epigenotype by imprinting mutations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996, 93:7811-7815.
45. Buiting K, Dittrich B, Grob S, Lich C, Farber C, Buchholz T, Smith E, Reis A, Burger J, Nothen MM et al.: Sporadic imprinting defects in Prader-Willi Sydrome and Angelman Syndrome: Implications for imprint-switch models, genetic counseling, and prenatal diagnosis. Am J Hum Genet 1998, 63:170-180. This report focuses on sporadic imprinting defects found in rare PWS and AS patients. Interestingly, the investigators were not able to find mutations in the IC in these patients and conclude that the incorrect imprint in these non-IC deletion cases is the result of a spontaneous prezygotic or postzygotic error.
46. Sutcliffe JS, Nakao M, Christian S, Orstavik KH, Tommerup N, Ledbetter DH, Beaudet AL: Deletions of a differentially methylated cpg island at the SNRPN gene define a putative imprinting control region. Nat Genet 1994, 8:52-58.
47. Glenn CC, Saitoh S, Jong MTC, Filbrandt MM, Surti U, Driscoll DJ, Nicholls RD: Gene structure, DNA methylation, and imprinted expression of the human SNRPN gene. Am J Hum Genet 1996, 58:335-346.
48. Gabriel JM, Gray TA, Stubbs L, Saitoh S, Ohta T, Nicholls RD: Structure and function Correlations at the Imprinted Mouse Snrpn Locus. Mamm Gen 1998, 9:788-793.
49. Schumacher A, Buiting K, Zeshnigk M, Doerfler W, Horsthemke B: Methylation analysis of the PWS/AS region does not support an enhancer-competition model. Nat Genet 1998, 19:324-325.
50. Dittrich B, Buiting K, Korn B, Rickard S, Buxton J, Saitoh S, Nicholls RD, Poustka A, Winterpacht A, Zabel B, Horsthemke B: Imprint switching on human chromosome 15 may involve alternative transcripts of the SNRPN gene. Nat Genet 1996, 14:163-170.
51. Ferguson-Smith AC: Imprinting moves to the center. Nat Genet 1996, 14:119-121.
52. Tilghman SM, Caspary T, Ingram RS: Competitive edge at the imprinted Prader-Willi/Angelman region? Nat Genet 1998, 18:206-208.
53. Rougeulle C, Cardoso C, Fontes M, Colleaux L, Lalande M: An imprinted antisense RNA overlaps UBE3A and a second maternally expressed transcript. Nat Genet 1998, 19:15-16. This publication reports evidence for two additional transcripts at the 3′ end of UBE3A: a downstream sense transcript that is maternally expressed and an antisense transcript that is paternally expressed. The authors suggest that the antisense transcript may serve to regulate the expression of the UBE3A gene.