Randomized in vitro and in vivo evaluation of different biopsy needles and devices for breast biopsy

Clinical Radiology

Volumn 54, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 56-62

  Helbich, Thomas H ^a   Rudas, Margret ^a   Böhm, Gerhard ^a   Huber, Sabine ^b   Wagner, Teresa ^a   Taucher, Susanne ^a   Wolf, Georg ^a   Mostbeck, Gerhard H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^b GENERAL HOSPITAL LINZ   (Austria)

Author keywords

Biopsies, technology; Breast neoplasms, biopsy; Diagnosis

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ASPIRATION BIOPSY; BREAST BIOPSY; CADAVER; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DEVICE; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IN VITRO STUDY; IN VIVO STUDY; NEEDLE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCORING SYSTEM; STEREOTAXIC SURGERY;

EID: 0032919324     PISSN: 00099260     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0009-9260(99)91241-2     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Parker SH, Lovin JD, Jobe WE et al. Stereotactic breast biopsy with a biopsy gun. Radiology 1990;176:741-747.
2. Parker SH, Jobe WE, Dennis MA et al. US-guided automated large-core breast biopsy. Radiology 1993;187:507-511.
3. Parker SH, Burbank F, Jackman RJ et al. Percutaneous large-core breast biopsy: A multi-institutional study. Radiology 1994;193:359-364.
4. Liberman LL, Evans WP III, Dershaw DD et al. Radiography of microcalcifications in stereotaxic mammary core biopsy specimens. Radiology 1994;190:223-225.
5. Parker SH, Burbank F. A practical approach to minimally invasive breast biopsy. Radiology 1996;200:11-20.
6. Helbich TH, Mayr W, Schick S et al. Coaxial technique: Approach to breast core biopsies. Radiology 1997;203:684-690.
7. Caines JS, McPhee MD, Konok SG, Wright BA. Stereotaxic needle core biopsy of breast lesions using a regular mammographic table with an adaptable stereotaxic device. American Journal of Radiology 1994;163:317-321.
8. Dronkers DD. Stereotaxic core biopsy of breast lesions. Radiology 1992;183:631-634.
9. Dowlatshahi K, Yaremko ML, Kluskens LF, Jokich PM. Nonpalpable breast lesions: Findings of stereotaxic needle-core biopsy and fineneedle aspiration cytology. Radiology 1991;181:745-750.
10. Vega A, Arrizabalaga R, Garijo F, Guerra I. Nonpalpable breast lesion: Stereotaxic core needle aspiration biopsy with a single pass. Acta Radiologica 1995;36:117-121.
11. Hopper KD, Abendroth CS, Sturtz KW, Matthews YL, Stevens LA, Shirk SJ. Automated biopsy devices: A blinded evaluation. Radiology 1993;187:653-660.
12. Hopper KD, Abendroth CS, Sturtz KW et al. CT percutaneous biopsy guns: Comparison of end-cut and side-notch devices in cadaveric specimens. American Journal of Radiology 1994;164:195-199.
13. Pokieser P, Kain R, Helbich T et al. Renal biopsy: in vitro and in vivo comparison of a new automatic biopsy device and conventional biopsy systems. Radiology 1993;186:573-576.
14. Krebs TL, Berg WA, Severson M et al. Large-core biopsy guns: Comparison for yield of breast tissue. Radiology 1996;200:365-368.
15. Marchevsky AM, Erler BS. Morphometry in Pathology In: Imaging Analysis, a Primer for Pathologists, New York: Raven Press, 1994, 125-179.
16. Svane G, Potchen EJ, Sierra A et al. Screening mammography: Breast cancer diagnosis in asymptomatic women. St. Louis: Mosby 1993.
17. Rosner B. Fundamentals of Biostatistics. Boston, MA: PWS-Kent, 1990.
18. Mostbeck GH, Wittich GR, Derfler K et al. Optimal needle size for renal biopsy: In vitro and in vivo evaluation. Radiology 1989;173:819-822.
19. Nath ME, Robinson TM, Tobon H et al. Automated large-core needle biopsy of surgically removed breast lesions: Comparison of samples obtained with 14-, 16-, and 18-gauge needles. Radiology 1995;197:739-742.
20. Burbank F, Belville J. Core breast biopsy, research, and what not to do. Radiology 1992;185:639-640.
21. Rosen PP, Oberman HA. Atlas of Tumor Pathology. Tumors of the Mammary Gland. Washington DC: Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, 1993.