Large-core biopsy guns: Comparison for yield of breast tissue

Radiology

Volumn 200, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 365-368

  Krebs, Thorsten L ^a   Berg, Wendie A ^a   Severson, Marlene J ^a   Magder, Laurence S ^a   Goldberg, Paul A ^a   Campassi, Cristina ^a   Sun, Chen Chih J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Biopsies, technology; Breast neoplasms, diagnosis; Breast, biopsy

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOPSY; BREAST; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST TUMOR; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;

EID: 0029895753     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiology.200.2.8685327     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Elvecrog E, Lechner MC, Nelson MT. Nonpalpable breast lesions: correlation of stereotaxic large-core needle biopsy and surgical biopsy results. Radiology 1993; 188:453-455.
2. Parker SH, Jobe WE, Dennis MA, et al. US-guided automated large-core breast biopsy. Radiology 1993; 187:507-511.
3. Parker SH, Lovin JD, Jobe WE, Burke BJ, Hopper KD, Yakes WF. Nonpalpable breast lesions: stereotaxic automated large-core biopsies. Radiology 1991; 180:403-407.
4. Parker SH, Lovin JD, Jobe WE, et al. Stereotactic breast biopsies with a biopsy gun. Radiology 1990; 176:741-747.
5. Nath ME, Robinson TM, Tobon H, Chough DM, Sumkin JH. Automated large-core needle biopsy of surgically removed breast lesions: comparison of samples obtained with 14-, 16-, and 18-gauge needles. Radiology 1995; 197:739-742.
6. Parker SH, Burbank F, Jackman RJ, et al. Percutaneous large-core breast biopsy: a multi-institutional study. Radiology 1994; 193:359-364.
7. Dronkers DJ. Stereotaxic core biopsy of breast lesions. Radiology 1992; 183:631-634.
8. Dowlatshahi K, Yaremko ML, Kluskens LF, Jokich PM. Nonpalpable breast lesions: findings of Stereotaxic needle-core biopsy and fine-needle aspiration cytology. Radiology 1991; 181:745-750.
9. Hopper KD, Abendroth CS, Sturtz KW, Matthews YL, Stevens LA, Shirk SJ. Automated biopsy devices: a blinded evaluation. Radiology 1993; 187:653-660.
10. Hopper KD, Abendroth CS, Sturtz KW, Matthews YL, Hartzel JS, Potok PS. CT percutaneous biopsy guns: comparison of end-cut and side-notch devices in cadaveric specimens. AJR 1994; 164:195-199.
11. Dershaw DD, Morris EA, Liberman L, Abramson AF. Nondiagnostic Stereotaxic core breast biopsy: results of rebiopsy. Radiology 1996; 198:323-325.
12. Berg WA. When is core breast biopsy or fine-needle aspiration enough? Radiology 1996; 198:313-315.
13. Brenner RJ, Fajardo L, Fisher PR, et al. Percutaneous core biopsy of breast: effect of operator experience and number of samples on diagnostic accuracy. AJR 1996; 166:341-346.
14. Liberman L, Dershaw DD, Rosen PP, Abramson AF, Deutch BM, Hann LE. Stereotaxic 14-gauge breast biopsy: how many core biopsy specimens are needed? Radiology 1994; 192:793-795.
15. Gisvold JJ, Goellner JR, Grant CS, et al. Breast biopsy: a comparative study of stereotaxically guided core and excisional techniques. AJR 1994; 162:815-820.
16. Hopper KD, Abendroth CS, Sturtz KW, Mathews YL, Shirk SJ, Stevens LA. Blinded comparison of biopsy needles and automated devices in vitro. II. Biopsy of medical renal disease. AJR 1993; 161:1299-1301.
17. Frouge C, Tristant H, Guinebretiere JM, et al. Mammographic lesions suggestive of radial scars: microscopic findings in 40 cases. Radiology 1995; 195:623-625.