Glycosylation can influence topogenesis of membrane proteins and reveals dynamic reorientation of nascent polypeptides within the translocon

Journal of Cell Biology

Volumn 147, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 257-265

  Goder, Veit ^a   Bieri, Christoph ^a   Spiess, Martin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BASEL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Endoplasmic reticulum; Glycosylation; Integral membrane protein; Signal recognition particle; Signal sequence

Indexed keywords

CHIMERIC PROTEIN; MEMBRANE PROTEIN; POLYPEPTIDE; SIGNAL PEPTIDE;

AMINO TERMINAL SEQUENCE; ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CARBOXY TERMINAL SEQUENCE; CELL STRAIN COS1; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENDOPLASMIC RETICULUM; NONHUMAN; ORIENTATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN GLYCOSYLATION; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN TARGETING;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANIMALS; BINDING SITES; BIOLOGICAL TRANSPORT; COS CELLS; ENDOPLASMIC RETICULUM; GLYCOSYLATION; MEMBRANE PROTEINS; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS;

ANIMALIA; MAMMALIA;

EID: 0032727707     PISSN: 00219525     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1083/jcb.147.2.257     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Andrews, D.W., J.C. Young, L.F. Mirels, and G.J. Czarnota. 1992. The role of the N-region in signal sequence and signal-anchor function. J. Biol. Chem. 267:7761-7769.
2. Beltzer, J.P., K. Fiedler, C. Fuhrer, I. Geffen, C. Handschin, H.P. Wessels, and M. Spiess. 1991. Charged residues are major determinants of the transmembrane orientation of a signal-anchor sequence. J. Biol. Chem. 266:973-978.
3. Blobel, G. 1980. Intracellular protein topogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 77:1496-1500.
4. Brodsky, J.L., J. Goeckeler, and R. Schekman. 1995. BiP and Sec63p are required for both co-and posttranslational protein translocation into the yeast endoplasmic reticulum. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 92:9643-9646.
5. Coleman, J., M. Inukai, and M. Inouye. 1985. Dual functions of the signal peptide in protein transfer across the membrane. Cell. 43:351-360.
6. Denzer, A.J., C.E. Nabholz, and M. Spiess. 1995. Transmembrane orientation of signal-anchor proteins is affected by the folding state but not the size of the N-terminal domain. EMBO (Eur. Mol. Biol. Organ.) J. 14:6311-6317.
7. Ellis, L., E. Clauser, D.O. Morgan, M. Edery, R.A. Roth, and W.J. Rutter. 1986. Replacement of insulin receptor tyrosine residues 1162 and 1163 compromises insulin-stimulated kinase activity and uptake of 2-deoxyglucose. Cell. 45:721-732.
8. Eusebio, A., T. Friedberg, and M. Spiess. 1998. The role of the hydrophobic domain in orienting natural signal sequences within the ER membrane. Exp. Cell Res. 241:181-185.
9. Gething, M.J., and J. Sambrook. 1981. Cell-surface expression of influenza haemagglutinin from a cloned DNA copy of the RNA gene. Nature: 293: 620-625.
10. Gilmore, R., and G. Blobel. 1985. Translocation of secretory proteins across the microsomal membrane occurs through an environment accessible to aqueous perturbants. Cell. 42:497-505.
11. Görlich, D., and T.A. Rapoport. 1993. Protein translocation into proteoliposomes reconstituted from purified components of the endoplasmic reticulum membrane. Cell. 75:615-630.
12. Gravelin, G., M. Sakaguchi, H. Andersson, and G. von Heijne. 1997. Topological rules for membrane protein assembly in eukaryotic cells. J. Biol. Chem. 272:6119-6127.
13. Habener, J.F., J.T. Potts. Jr., and A. Rich. 1976. Pre-proparathyroid hormone. Evidence for an early biosynthetic precursor of proparathyroid hormone. J. Biol. Chem. 251:3893-3899.
14. Hamman, B.D.. J.-C. Chen, E.E. Johnson, and A.E. Johnson. 1997. The aqueous pore through the translocon has a diameter of 40-60 A during cotranslational protein translocation at the ER membrane. Cell. 89:535-544.
15. Hanein, D., K.E.S. Matlack, B. Jungnickel, K. Plath, K.-U. Kalies, K R. Miller, T.A. Rapoport, and C.W. Akey. 1996. Oligomeric rings of the Sec61p complex induced by ligands required for protein translocation. Cell. 87:721-732.
16. Harley, C.A., J.A. Holt, R. Turner, and D.J. Tipper. 1998. Transmembrane protein insertion orientation in yeast depends on the charge difference across transmembrane segments, their total hydrophobicity, and its distribution. J. Biol. Chem. 273:24963-24971.
17. Hartmann, E., T.A. Rapoport, and H.F. Lodish. 1989. Predicting the orientation of eukaryotic membrane spanning proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 86:5786-5790.
18. Hegde, R.S., S. Voigt, T.A. Rapoport, and V.R. Lingappa. 1998. TRAM regulates the exposure of nascent secretory proteins to the cytosol during translocation into the endoplasmic reticulum. Cell. 92:621-631.
19. High, S., and V. Laird. 1997. Membrane protein biosynthesis-all sewn up? Trends Cell Biol. 7:206-209.
20. Johnsson, N., and A. Varshavsky. 1994. Ubiquitin-assisted dissection of protein transport across membranes. EMBO (Eur. Mol. Biol. Organ.) J. 13:2686-2698.
21. Kutay, U., G. Ahnert-Hilger, E. Hartmann, B. Wiedenmann, and T.A. Rapoport. 1995. Transport route for synaptobrevin via a novel pathway of insertion into the endoplasmic reticulum membrane. EMBO (Eur. Mol. Biol. Organ) J. 14:217-223.
22. Leitinger. B., A. Hille-Rehfeld, and M. Spiess. 1995. Biosynthetic transport of the asialoglycoprotein receptor H1 to the cell surface occurs via endosomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 92:10109-10113.
23. Lipp, J., N. Flint, M.T. Haeuptle, and B. Dobberstein. 1989. Structural requirements for membrane assembly of proteins spanning the membrane several times. J. Cell Biol. 109:2013-2022.
24. Martoglio, B., M.W. Hofmann, J. Brunner, and B. Dobberstein. 1995. The protein-conducting channel in the membrane of the endoplasmic reticulum is open laterally toward the lipid bilayer. Cell. 81:207-214.
25. Matlack, K.E.S., B. Misselwitz, K. Plath, and T.A. Rapoport. 1999. BiP acts as a molecular ratchet during posttranslational transport of prepro-α factor across the ER membrane. Cell. 97:553-564.
26. Maurer, R.A., and D.J. McKean. 1978. Synthesis of preprolactin and conversion to prolactin in intact cells and a cell-free system. J. Biol. Chem. 253: 6315-6318.
27. Mothes, W., S.U. Heinrich. R. Graf. I. Nilsson, G. van Heijne, J. Brunner, and T. Rapoport. 1997. Molecular mechanism of membrane protein integration into the endoplasmic reticulum. Cell. 89:523-533.
28. Mothes, W., B. Jungnickel, J. Brunner, and T.A. Rapoport. 1998. Signal sequence recognition in cotranslational translocation by protein components of the endoplasmic reticulum membrane. J. Cell Biol. 142:355-364.
29. Ng, D.T., J.D. Brown, and P. Walter. 1996. Signal sequences specify the targeting route to the endoplasmic reticulum membrane. J. Cell Biol. 134:269-278.
30. Panzner, S., L. Dreier, E. Hartmann, S. Kostka, and T.A. Rapoport. 1995. Posttranslational protein transport in yeast reconstituted with a purified complex of Sec-proteins and Kar2p. Cell. 81:561-570.
31. Parks,. G.D., and R.A. Lamb. 1991. Topology of eukaryotic type-II memhrane proteins: importance of N-terminal positively charged residues flanking the hydrophobic domain. Cell. 64:777-787.
32. Pilon, M., K. Romisch, D. Quach, and R. Schekman, 1998. Sec61p serves multiple roles in secretory precursor binding and translocation into the endoplasmic reticulum membrane. Mol. Biol. Cell. 9:3455-3473.
33. Rothe. C., and L. Lehle. 1998. Sorting of invertase signal peptide mutants in yeast dependent and independent on the signal-recognition particle. Eur. J Biochem. 252:16-24.
34. Rothman, J.E., and H.F. Lodish. 1977. Synchronised transmembrane insertion and glycosylation of a nascent memhrane protein. Nature. 269:775-780.
35. Sakaguchi, M., R. Tomiyoshi, T. Kuroiwa, K. Mihara, and T. Omura, 1992. Functions of signal and signal-anchor sequences are determined by the balance between the hydrophobic segment and the N-terminal charge. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 89:16-19.
36. Sato, M., R. Hresko, and M. Mueckler. 1998. Testing the charge difference hypothesis for the assembly of a eucaryotic multispanning membrane protein. J. Biol. Chem. 273:25203-25208.
37. Shakin-Eshleman, S.H., S.L. Spitalnik, and L. Kasturi. 1996. The amino acid at the X position of an Asn-X-Ser sequon is an important determinant of N-linked core-glycosylation efficiency. J. Biol. Chem. 271:6363-6366.
38. Spiess, M. 1995. Head or tails - what determines the orientation of proteins in the membrane. FEBS Lett. 369:76-79.
39. Spiess, M., A.L. Schwarte, and H.F. Lodish. 1985. Sequence of human asialoglycoprotein receptor cDNA. An internal signal sequence for membrane insertion. J. Biol. Chem. 260:1979-1982.
40. Suzuki, T., H. Park, K. Kitajima, and W.J. Lennarz. 1998. Peptides glycosylated in the endoplasmic reticulum of yeast are subsequently deglycosylated by a soluble peptide: N-glycanase activity. J. Biol. Chem. 273:21526-21530.
41. Voigt, S., B. Jungnickel, E. Hartmann, and T.A. Rapoport. 1996. Signal sequence-dependent function of the TRAM protein during early phases of protein transport across the endoplasmic reticulum memhrane. J. Cell Biol. 134:25-35.
42. von Heijne, G. 1989. Control of topology and mode of assembly of a polytopic membrane protein by positively charged residues. Nature. 341:456-458.
43. Wahlberg, J.M., and M. Spiess. 1997. Multiple determinants direct the orientation of signal-anchor proteins: the topogenic role of the hydrophobic signal domain. J. Cell Biol. 137:555-562.
44. Walter, P., and A.E. Johnson. 1994. Signal sequence recognition and protein targeting to the endoplasmic reticulum membrane. Annu. Rev. Cell Biol. 10: 87-119.
45. Wessels, H.P., and M. Spiess. 1988. Insertion of a multispanning membrane protein requires only one signal sequence. Cell. 55:61-70.
46. Wessels, H.P., J.P. Beltzer, and M. Spiess. 1991. Analysis of protein topology in the endoplasmic reticulum. Methods Cell Biol. 34:287-302.
47. Zimmermann, R. 1998. The role of molecular chaperones in protein transport into the mammalian endoplasmic reticulum. Biol. Chem. 379:275-282.
48. Zimmermann, R., M. Zimmermann, H. Wiech, G. Schlenstedt, G. Müller, F. Morel, P. Klappa, C. Jung, and W.W.E. Cobet. 1990. Ribonucleoparticle-independent transport of proteins into mammalian microsomes. J. Bioenerg. Biomembr. 22:711-723.