New horizons in stroke rehabilitation research

Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development

Volumn 36, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 19-31

  Hoenig, Helen ^a   Horner, Ronnie D ^b   Duncan, Pamela W ^b   Clipp, Elizabeth ^b   Hamilton, Byron ^b  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Conceptual model; Health services research; Physical therapy; Rehabilitation; Structure and process of care

Indexed keywords

COST EFFECTIVENESS; DATABASE SYSTEMS; HEALTH CARE; HUMAN REHABILITATION ENGINEERING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; OPTIMIZATION;

STROKE REHABILITATION;

PHYSICAL THERAPY;

ARTICLE; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; PHYSICAL DISABILITY; PHYSIOTHERAPY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STROKE;

CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DATABASES, FACTUAL; HEALTH CARE COSTS; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMANS; OUTCOME AND PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PHYSICAL MEDICINE; REHABILITATION; RESEARCH; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0032601392     PISSN: 07487711     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. Pope AM, Tarlov AR. Disability in America. Washington DC: National Academy Press; 1991. p. 1-15.
2. Kunkel SR, Applebaum RA. Estimating the prevalence of long term disability for an aging society. J Gerontol 1992;47(5):S253-60.
3. Fuhrer MJ. Comments on: rehabilitation care and outcomes from the patient perspective, presented by Andrew M. Kramer, MD. Med Care 1997;35(6):JS58-60.
4. Kane RL. Looking for physical therapy outcomes. Phys Ther 1994;74(5):425-9.
5. Mauthe RW, Haaf DC, Hayn P, Krall JM. Predicting discharge destination of stroke patients using a mathematical model based on six items from the Functional Independence Measure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996;77(1):10-3.
6. Donabedian A. The definition of quality and approaches to its assessment. Vol. 1. Ann Arbor, MI: Health Administration Press; 1980.
7. Fiedler RC, Granger CV, Ottenbacher KJ. The uniform data system for medical rehabilitation: report of first admissions for 1994. Am J Phys Med 1996;75:125-9.
8. Buchanan J, Rumpel D, Hoenig H. Charges for outpatient rehabilitation services: growth and differences in provider types. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996;77(4):320-8.
9. Fuhrer MJ. Assessing medical rehabilitation practices: the promise of outcomes research. Baltimore: Brookes Publishing Co.; 1997.
10. Ostrow PC, Spencer FM, Johnson M, editors. The cost-effectiveness of rehabilitation: a guide to research relevant to occupational therapy. Rockville. MD: American Occupational Therapy Association, Inc.; 1987.
11. Gresham GE, Duncan PW, Stason WB. Post-stroke rehabilitation: assessment, referral, and patient management. Clinical Practice Guideline No. 16. AHCPR # 95-0663. Rockville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services. Public Health Service, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research; 1995.
12. Council on Medical Services. Quality of care. JAMA 1988;256(8):1032.
13. Commission on Accreditation of Rehabilitation Facilities. Standards manual and interpretive guidelines for medical rehabilitation. Tucson, AZ: Commission on Accreditation of Rehabilitation Facilities; 1997.
14. Kane RL, Chen Q, Blewett LA, Sangl J. Do rehabilitative nursing homes improve the outcomes of care? J Am Geriatr Soc 1996;44(5):545-54.
15. Kramer AM, Steiner JF, Schlenker RE, et al. Outcomes and costs after hip fracture and stroke. JAMA 1997;227(5):396-404.
16. Langhorne P, Williams BO, Gilchrist W, Howie K. Do stroke units save lives? Lancet 1993;432:395-8.
17. Keith RA. Observations in the rehabilitation hospital: twenty years of research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1988;69(8):625-31.
18. Jette AM, Davis K. A comparison of hospital-based and private outpatient physical therapy practices. Phys Ther 1991;7(5):366-75.
19. Keith RA, Wilson DB, Gutierrez P. Acute and subacute rehabilitation for stroke: a comparison. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1995;76(6):495-500.
20. Wright RE, Rao N, Smith RM, Harvey RF. Risk factors for death and emergency transfer in acute and subacute inpatient rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996;77(10): 1049-55.
21. Stroke Unit Trialists' Collaboration. Collaborative systematic review of the randomized trials of organized inpatient (stroke unit) care after stroke. BMJ 1997;314:1151-9.
22. Sainfort F, Ramsay JD, Monato H. Conceptual and methodological sources of variation in nursing facility quality: an evaluation of 24 models and an empirical study. Med Care Res Rev 1995;52(1):60-87.
23. Keith RA. The comprehensive treatment team in rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1991;72(5):269-74.
24. Smith ME, Garraway WM, Smith DL, Akhtar AJ. Therapy impact on functional outcome in a controlled trial of stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1982:63(1):21-4.
25. Ottenbacher KL, Jannel S. The results of clinical trials in stroke rehabilitation research. Arch Neurol 1993;50(1):37-44.
26. North Carolina Area Health Education Centers. North Carolina Health Careers. Chapel Hill, NC: North Carolina Area Health Education Centers; 1994. p. 98-9.
27. US Department of Labor. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Occupational outlook handbook. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office: Bulletin 2450. ISBN 0-16-043044-5; 1994.
28. Jette AM. Disablement outcomes in geriatric rehabilitation. Med Care 1997;35(6):JS28-37.
29. Mackey F, Ada L, Heard R, Adams R. Stroke rehabilitation: are highly structured units more conducive to physical activity than less structured units? Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996;7(10):1066-70.
30. Balfour JL, Kaplan GA. Neighborhood environment and loss of physical function: evidence from the Alameda County study. Gerontologist 1997;37(1):350.
31. Cummings V, Kerner JF, Arones S, Steinbock C. Day hospital service in rehabilitation medicine: an evaluation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1985;66(2):86-91.
32. Aiken LH, Sochalski J, Lake ET. Studying outcomes of organizational change in health services. Med Care 1997;35(11):NS6-18.
33. Kramer AM. Rehabilitation care and outcomes from the patient perspective. Med Care 1997;35(6):JS48-57.
34. Department of Veterans Affairs. Veterans Health Administration directive 97-024. Washington, DC. 1997.
35. Kerssens JJ, Groenewegen PP. Referrals to physiotherapy: the relationship between the number of referrals, the indication for referral and the inclination to refer. Soc Sci Med 1990;30(7):797-804.
36. Mitchell JM, Scott E. Physician ownership of physical therapy services: effects on charges, utilization, profits, and service characteristics. JAMA 1992;268(15):2055-9.
37. Murtaugh CM, Cooney LM, DerSimmonian RR, Smits HL, Fetter RB. Nursing home reimbursement and the allocation of rehabilitation therapy resources. Health Serv Res 1988;23(4):467-93.
38. Kochersberger G, Hielma F, Westlund R. Rehabilitation in the nursing home: how much, why and with what results. Public Health Rep 1994;109(3):372-6.
39. Jette AM, Smith K, Haley SM, Davis KD. Physical therapy episodes of care for patients with low back pain. Phys Ther 1994;74(2):101-15.
40. Kahn KL, Rogers WH, Rubenstein LV, et al. Measuring quality of care with explicit process criteria before and after implementation of the DRG-based prospective payment system. JAMA 1990;264(15):1969-73.
41. Hoenig H, Nusbaum N, Brummel-Smith K. Geriatric rehabilitaton: state of the art. J Am Geriatr Soc 1997;45(11):1371-81.
42. Hesse S, Bereit D, Jahnke MT, et al. Treadmill training with partial body weight support compared with physiotherapy in nonambulatory hemiparetic patients. Stroke 1995;26(6):976-81.
43. Duncan PW. Synthesis of intervention trials to improve motor recovery following stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil 1997;3(4):1-20.
44. LaPlante MP, Hendershot GE, Moss AJ. Assistive technology devices and home accessibility features: prevalence, payment, needs, and trends. National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control, Public Health Service, US Department of Health and Human Services. Advance Data No. 217; 1992.
45. Mann WC, Hurren D, Tomita M. Comparison of assistive device use and needs of home-based older persons with different impairments. Am J Occup Ther 1993;47(11):980-7.
46. Rogers JC, Holm MB. Assistive technology device use in patients with rheumatic disease: a literature review. Am J Occup Ther 1992;46(2):120-7.
47. Verbrugge LM, Rennert C, Madans JH. The great efficacy of personal and equipment assistance in reducing disability. Am J Pub Health 1997;87(3):384-92.
48. Hart D, Bowling A, Ellis M, Silman A. Locomotor disability in very elderly people: value of a programme for screening and provision of aids for daily living. BMJ 1990;301:216-20.
49. Gahimer JE, Domholdt E. Amount of patient education in physical therapy practice and perceived effects. Phys Ther 1996;76(10):1089-96.
50. Puett DW, Griffin MR. Published trials of nonmedicinal and noninvasive therapies for hip and knee osteoarthritis. Ann Intern Med 1994;121(2):133-40.
51. Carey TS, Garrett J, Jackman A, McLaughlin C, Fryer J, Smucker DR. The outcomes and costs of care for acute low back pain among patient seen by primary care practitioners, chiropracters, and orthopedic surgeons. N Engl J Med 1995;333(14):913-7.
52. Lehmann JF, DeLateur BJ. Lower extremity orthotics. In: Kottke FJ, Lehmann JF eds. Krusen's handbook of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 4th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1990. p. 602-46.
53. Zorowitz RD, Idank D, Ikai T, Hughes MB, Johnston MV. Shoulder subluxation after stroke: a comparison of four supports. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1995;76(8):763-71.
54. Liang MH. Comments on: disablement outcomes in geriatric rehabilitation, presented by Alan M. Jette, PhD, MPH, PT. Med Care 1997;356(6):JS42-4.
55. Tinetti ME, Baker DI, McAvay G, et al. A multifactorial intervention to reduce the risk of falling among elderly people living in the community. N Engl J Med 1994;331(13):821-7.
56. O'Neil MB, Woodard M, Sosa V, et al. Physical therapy assessment and treatment protocol for nursing home residents. Phys Ther 1992;72(8):596-604.
57. Jensen GM, Shepard KF, Gwyer J, Hack LM. Attribute dimensions that distinguish master and novice physical therapy clinicians in orthopedic settings. Phys Ther 1992;72(10):711-22.
58. Mattingly C, Gillette N. Anthropology, occupational therapy, and action research. Am J Occup Ther 1991;45(11):972-8.
59. Horner R, Hoenig H, Sloane R, Rubenstein LV, Kahn K. Racial differences in utilization of inpatient rehabilitation services among elderly stroke patients. Stroke 1997;28(1):19-25.
60. Lee AJ, Huber J, Stason WB. Post-stroke rehabilitation in older Americans: the Medicare experience. Med Care 1996;34(8):811-25.
61. Hoenig H., Rubenstein LV, Sloane RS, Horner RH, Kahn K. What is the role of timing in the surgical and rehabilitative care of community dwelling older persons after acute hip fracture? Arch Intern Med 1997;157(5):513-20.
62. Taub E, Miller NE, Novack TA, et al. Technique to improved chronic motor deficit after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993;74(4):347-54.
63. Young GJ, Charns MP, Daley J, Forbes MG, Henderson W, Khuri SF. Best practices for managing surgical services: the role of coordination. Health Care Manage Rev 1997;22(4):72-81.
64. Shortell SM, Zimmerman JE, Rousseau DM, et al. The performance of intensive care units: does good management make a difference? Med Care 1994;32:508-25.
65. Strasser DC, Falconer JA, Saltzmann-Martino D. The rehabilitation team: staff perceptions of the hospital environment, the interdisciplinary team environment, and interprofessional relations. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994;75:177-82.
66. Forbes SA, Duncan PW, Zimmerman PHD. Review criteria for stroke rehabilitation outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1997;78(10):1112-6.
67. Falconer JA, Roth EJ, Sutin JA, Strasser DC, Chang RW. The critical path method in stroke rehabilitation: lessons learned from an experiment in cost containment and outcome improvement. Qual Rev Bull 1993;19(1):8-16.
68. Wentworh DA, Arkinson RF. Implementation of an acute stroke program decreases hospitalization costs and length of stay. Stroke 1996;27(6):1040-3.
69. International classification of impairments, disabilities, and handicaps: a manual of classifications relating to the consequences of disease. World Health Organization. Geneva, Switzerland; 1990.
70. Guralnick JM, Ferrucci E, Simonsick EM, Salive ME, Wallace RB. Lower-extremity function in persons over the age of 70 years as a predictor of subsequent disability. N Engl J Med 1995;332(9):556-61.
71. Lawrence RH, Jette AM. Disentangling the disablement process. J Gerontol B Psycho Sci Soc Sci 1996;51B(4):S173-82.
72. Applegate WB, Miller ST, Elam JT, Freeman JM, Wood TO, Gettlefinger TC. Impact of cataract surgery with lens implantation on vision and physical function in elderly patients. JAMA 1987;257(8):1064-6.
73. Dijkers M. Measuring quality of Life. In: Fuhrer MJ, editor. Assessing medical rehabilitation practices: the promise of outcomes research. Baltimore: Brookes Publishing Co.; 1997. p. 153-79.
74. McDowell I, Newell C. Measuring health: a guide to rating scales and questionnaires. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 1996.
75. Elixhauser A., Duffy SQ, Sommers JP. Most frequent diagnoses and procedures for DRGS, by insurance status. AHCPR Publication No. 97-0006. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP-3) Research Note 4. Rockville MD: US Dept. of Health and Human Services. Public Health Service, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research; 1996.
76. Duncan PW, Hoenig H, Hamilton B, Samsa G. Characterizing medical rehabilitation interventions. In: Fuhrer MJ, editor. Assessing medical rehabilitation practices: the promise of outcomes research. Baltimore: Brookes Publishing Co.; 1997. p. 307-17.
77. Hamilton BB, Granger CV, Sherwin FS, Zielezny M, Tashman JS. A uniform national data system for rehabilitation. In: Fuhrer MJ, editor. Assessing medical rehabilitation practices: the promise of outcomes research. Baltimore: Brookes Publishing Co.; 1997. p. 137-47.
78. Harada N, Sofaer S, Kominski G. Functional status outcomes in rehabilitation: implications for prospective payment. Med Care 1993;31(4):345-57.
79. Henry SB, Holzemer WL. Achievement of appropriate self-care: does care delivery system make a difference. Med Care 1997;35(11):NS33-40.
80. Strasser DC, Falconer JA. Linking treatment to outcomes through teams: building a conceptual model of rehabilitation effectiveness. Top Stroke Rehabil 1997;4(1):15-27.
81. Whyte J. Distinctive methodological challenges. In: Fuhrer MJ, editor. Assessing medical rehabilitation practices: the promise of outcomes research. Baltimore: Brookes Publishing Co.; 1997. p. 43-59.