Achievement of appropriate self-care: Does care delivery system make a difference?

Medical Care

Volumn 35, Issue 11 SUPPL. 1, 1997, Pages

  Henry, Suzanne Bakken ^a   Holzemer, William L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Care delivery system; Functional status; Patient outcomes; Self care

Indexed keywords

DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMAN; LONG TERM CARE; METHODOLOGY; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; REVIEW; SELF CARE; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMANS; LONG-TERM CARE; MODELS, THEORETICAL; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); SELF CARE;

EID: 0031278652     PISSN: 00257079     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00005650-199711001-00004     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Bonamy C, Schultz P, Graham K, Hampton M. The use of theory-based practice in the Department of Veterans' Affairs Medical Centers. J Nurs Staff Dev 1995;11:27.
2. Holzemer WL. The impact of nursing care in Latin America and the Caribbean: A focus on outcomes. J Adv Nurs 1994;20:5.
3. Holzemer WL, Reilly CA. Variables, variability, and variations research: Implications for medical informatics. J Am Med Informatics Assoc 1995;2:183.
4. Donabedian A. Evaluating the quality of medical care. Milbank Q 1966;44:166.
5. Lipson JG, Steiger N. Self-care nursing in a multicultural context. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1996.
6. Orem D. Nursing: Concepts of practice. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1985.
7. Fawcett J. Orem's self-care framework. In: Fawcett J, ed. Analysis and evaluation of conceptual models of nursing. Philadelphia: FA Davis, 1989.
8. Leidy NK. Functional status and the forward progress of merry-go-rounds: Toward a coherent analytical framework. Nurs Res 1994;43:196.
9. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short form survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992;30:473.
10. Holzemer WL, Henry SB, Stewart A, Janson-Bjerklie S. The Quality Audit Marker: An outcome measure for hospitalized HIV/AIDS patients. Qual Life Res 1993;7:99.
11. Gast HL, Denyes MJ, Campbell JC, Hartweg DL, Schott-Baer D, Isenberg M. Self-care agency; Conceptualizations and operationalizations. Adv Nurs Sci 1989;12:26.
12. Granger CV, Albrecht GL, Hamilton BB. Outcome of comprehensive medical rehabilitation: Measurement by PULSES profile and Barthel Index. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1979;60:145.
13. Hamrin E, Wohlin A. Evaluation of the functional capacity of stroke patient through an activity index. Scand J Rehabil Med 1982;14:93.
14. Karnofsky DA, Abelmann WH, Craver LF, Burchenal JH. The use of nitrogen mustards in the palliative treatment of carcinoma with particular reference to bronchogenic carcinoma. Cancer 1948;48:634.
15. Katz S, Ford AB, Moskowitz RW, Jackson BA, Jaffe MW. Studies of illness in the aged: The Index of ADL, a standardized measure of biological and psychosocial function. JAMA 1963;185:94.
16. Denyes MJ. Orem's model used for health promotion: Directions for research. Adv Nurs Sci 1988;11:13.
17. Kearney BY, Fleischer BJ. Development of an instrument to measure exercise of self-care agency. Res Nurs Health 1979;2:25.
18. Moore JB, Gaffney KF. Development of an instrument to measure mothers' performance of self-care activities for children. Adv Nurs Sci 1989;12:76.
19. McHorney CA, Ware JE, Raczek AE. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care 1993;31:247.
20. McHorney CA, Ware JE, Lu R, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups. Med Care 1994;32:40.
21. Crawford BL, Taylor LS, Seipert BS, Lush M. The imperative of outcomes analysis: An integration of traditional and nontraditional outcome measures. J Nurs Care Qual 1996;10:33.
22. Lush MT, Jones DL, Nursing Outcomes Taskforce. Developing an outcomes infrastructure for nursing. In: Gardner RM, ed. Nineteenth annual Symposium for Computer Applications in Medical Care. New Orleans: Hanley & Belfus, 1995:625.
23. Cassard SD, Weisman CS, Gordon DL, Wong R. The impact of unit-based self-management by nurses on patient outcomes. Health Serv Res 1994;29:415.
24. Fretwell MD, Raymond PM, McGarvey ST, et al. The senior care study: A controlled trial of a consultative/unit-based geriatric assessment program in acute care. J Am Geriatr Soc 1990;38:1073.
25. Hamrin EKF, Lindmark B. The effect of systematic care planning after acute stroke in general hospital medical wards. J Adv Nurs 1990;15:1146.
26. Henry SB, Holzemer WL, Reilly CA. The relationship between type of care planning system and patient outcomes in hospitalized AIDS patients. J Adv Nurs 1994;19:691.
27. Hogan DB, Fox RA. A prospective controlled trial of a geriatric consultation team in an acute-care hospital. Age Ageing 1990;19:107.
28. Inouye SK, Wagner DR, Acampora D, Horwitz RI, Cooney LM, Tinetii ME. A controlled trial of a nursing-centered intervention in hospitalized elderly medical patients: The Yale Geriatric Care Program. J Am Geriatr Soc 1993;41:1353.
29. Landefeld CS, Palmer RM, Kresevic DM, Fortinsky RH, Kowal J. A randomized trial of care in a hospital medical unit especially designed to improve the functional outcomes of acutely ill older patients. N Engl J Med 1995;332:1338.
30. Meissner P, Andolsek K, Mears PA, Fletcher B. Maximizing the functional status of geriatric patients in an acute community hospital setting. Gerontologist 1989;29:524.
31. McVey LJ, Becker PM, Saltz CC, Feussner JR, Cohen HJ. Effect of a geriatric consultation team on functional status of elderly hospitalized patients. Ann Intern Med 1989;110:79.
32. Winograd CH, Gerety MB, Lai NA. A negative trial of inpatient geriatric consultation. Arch Intern Med 1993;153:2017.
33. North American Nursing Diagnosis Association (NANDA). NANDA nursing diagnoses: Definitions and classification 1995-1996. Philadelphia: NANDA, 1994.
34. Iowa Intervention Project. The NIC taxonomy structure. Image 1995;27:43.
35. Martin KS, Scheet NJ. The Omaha system: Applications for community health nursing. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1992.
36. Maas M, Johnson M. Nursing-sensitive patient outcome classification. In: Kelly K, ed. Series on nursing administration: Outcomes of effective management. St. Louis: Mosby-Year Book, 1996.