Disablement Outcomes in Geriatric Rehabilitation

Medical Care

Volumn 35, Issue 6 SUPPL., 1997, Pages

  Jette, Alan M ^a  

^a BOSTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Disablement outcomes; Geriatric rehabilitation

Indexed keywords

AGED; CLASSIFICATION; DISABLED PERSON; ELDERLY CARE; GERIATRIC ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; REHABILITATION; REVIEW; STANDARD; THEORETICAL MODEL;

AGED; DISABLED PERSONS; GERIATRIC ASSESSMENT; HEALTH SERVICES FOR THE AGED; HUMANS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); REHABILITATION;

EID: 0031156477     PISSN: 00257079     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00005650-199706001-00005     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Myers J. Consequences and prognoses of disability. In: Sussman M, ed. Sociology and rehabilitation. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association, 1965.
2. Rubenstein L, Josephson K, Wieland D, et al. Effectiveness of a geriatric evaluation unit: A randomized clinical trial. N Engl J Med 1984;311:1664.
3. Landefeld S, Palmer R, Kresevic D, et al. A randomized trial of care in a hospital medical unit especially designed to improve the functional outcomes of acutely ill older patients. N Engl J Med 1994;332:1338.
4. Reuben D, Borok G, Wolde-Tsadik G, et al. A randomized trial of comprehensive geriatric assessment in the care of hospitalized patients. N Engl J Med 1994; 332:1345.
5. Rubenstein L, Josephson K, Harker J, et al. The Sepulveda GEU Study revisited: Long term outcomes, use of services, and costs. Aging Clin Exp Res 1995; 7(3):212.
6. Stuck A, Aronow H, Steiner A, et al. A trial of annual in-home comprehensive geriatric assessments for elderly people living in the community. N Engl J Med 1995;333:1184.
7. Applegate W, Miller S, Granvy M, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of a geriatric assessment unit in a community rehabilitation hospital. N Engl J Med 1990; 322:1572.
8. Rubenstein L, Stuck A, Siu A, et al. Impacts of geriatric evaluation and management programs on defined outcomes: Overview of the evidence. J Am Geriat Soc 1991;39:8S.
9. Epstein A, Hall J, Besdine R, et al. The emergence of Geriatric Assessment Units: The "new technology of geriatrics." Ann Intern Med 1987;106:299.
10. Granger C, Gresham G. Functional assessment in rehabilitation medicine. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1984.
11. Kane RA, Kane RL. Assessing the elderly: A practical guide to measurement. Lexington, MA: DC Health & Company, 1981.
12. McDowell I, Newell C. Measuring health: A guide to rating scales and questionnaires. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996.
13. Halpern A, Fuhrer M, eds. Functional assessment in rehabilitation. Baltimore: Paul H. Brooks Publishing Co., 1984.
14. Verbrugge L, Jette A. The disablement process. Soc Sci Med 1994;38:1.
15. World Health Organization. International classification of impairments, disabilities, and handicaps. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1980.
16. Guccione A. Physical therapy diagnosis and the relationship between impairment and function. Phys Ther 1991;71:499.
17. Grimby G, Finnstam J, Jette A. On the application of the WHO handicap classification in rehabilitation. Scand J Rehab Med 1988;20:93.
18. Colvez A, Robine J. Problems encountered in using the concepts of impairment, disability, and handicap in a health assessment survey of the elderly in Upper Normandy. Int Rehabil Med 1986;8:18.
19. Pope A, Tarlov A, eds. Disability in America: Toward a national agenda for prevention. Division of Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, Institute of Medicine. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1991.
20. Nagi S. Disability concepts revisited: Implication for prevention. In: Pope A, Tarlov A, eds. Disability in America: Toward a national agenda for prevention. Division of Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, Institute of Medicine. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1991.
21. Canadian Society for the ICIDH: ICIDH and Environmental factors international network. March 1994;6(3).
22. Nagi S. Some conceptual issues in disability and rehabilitation. In: Sussman M, ed. Sociology and rehabilitation. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association, 1965:100.
23. Duckworth D. The need for a standard terminology and classification of disablement. In: Granger C, Gresham G, eds. Functional assessment in rehabilitation medicine. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1984.
24. Frey W. Functional assessment in the 80s: A conceptual enigma, a technical challenge. In: Halpern A, Fuhrer M, eds. Functional assessment in rehabilitation. Baltimore: Paul H. Brooks Publishing Co., 1984.
25. Granger C. A conceptual model for functional assessment. In: Granger C, Gresham G, eds. Functional assessment in rehabilitation medicine. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1984.