Tubulin structure: Insights into microtubule properties and functions

Current Opinion in Structural Biology

Volumn 8, Issue 6, 1998, Pages 785-791

  Downing, Kenneth H ^a   Nogales, Eva ^a,b  

^a LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COLCHICINE; PACLITAXEL; TUBULIN;

CONTROLLED STUDY; CRYSTALLOGRAPHY; DRUG PROTEIN BINDING; MICROTUBULE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STABILITY; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; REVIEW;

EID: 0032426329     PISSN: 0959440X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0959-440X(98)80099-7     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. 1. Nogales E, Wolf SG, Downing KH: Structure of the αβ tubulin dimer by electron crystallography. Nature 1998, 391:199-203. This first description of the structure of tubulin provides the basis for understanding the vast body of work that has been carried out on tubulin's properties and functions.
2. 2. Rossmann MG, Moras D, Olsen KW: Chemical and biological evolution of a nucleotide-binding protein. Nature 1974, 250:194-199.
3. 3. Downing KH, Nogales E: Tubulin and microtubule structure. Curr Opin Cell Biol 1998, 10:16-22.
4. 4. Muller-Reichert T, Chrétien D, Severin F, Hyman AA: Structural changes at microtubule ends accompanying GTP hydrolysis: information from a slowly hydrolyzable analogue of GTP, guanylyl (alpha,beta)methylenediphosphonate. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998, 95:3661-3666.
5. 5. Severin FF, Sorger PK, Hyman AA: Kinetochores distinguish GTP from GDP forms of the microtubule lattice. Nature 1997, 388:888-891. Kinetochores normally associate with the plus ends of microtubules (MTs) but, as shown in this paper, they can also bind along the MT, with a preference for regions that contain nonhydrolyzed nucleotides.
6. 6. Vale RD, Coppin CM, Malik F, Kull FJ, Milligan RA: Tubulin GTP hydrolysis influences the structure, mechanical properties, and kinesin-driven transport of microtubules. J Biol Chem 1994, 269:23769-23775.
7. 7. Hyman AA, Crétien D, Arnal I, Wade RH: Structural changes accompanying GTP hydrolysis of microtubules: information from a slowly hydrolyzable analogue guanylyl-(α,β)-methylenediphosphonate. J Cell Biol 1995, 128:117-125.
8. 8. Löwe J, Amos LA: Crystal structure of the bacterial cell division protein FtsZ. Nature 1998, 391:203-206. FtsZ was predicted to be a bacterial homolog of tubulin. Its structure was solved independently of tubulin, but at the same time, and shows a remarkable degree of similarity.
9. 9. Erickson HP, Taylor DW, Taylor KA, Bramhill D: Bacterial cell division protein FtsZ assembles into protofilament sheets and minirings, structural homologs of tubulin polymers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996, 93:519-523.
10. 10. RayChaudhuri D, Park JT: Escherichia coli cell-division gene FtsZ encodes a novel GTP-binding protein. Nature 1992, 359:251-254.
11. 11. de Boer P, Crossley R, Rothfield L: The essential bacteria cell-division protein FtsZ is a GTPase. Nature 1992, 359:254-256.
12. 12. Nogales E, Downing K, Amos L, Löwe J: Tubulin and FtsZ form a distinct family of GTPases. Nat Struct Biol 1998, 5:451-458. Both tubulin and FtsZ bind and hydrolyze GTP, but, structurally, they have more in common with dinucleotide-binding proteins than with classical GTPases.
13. 13. Erickson HP: Atomic structures of tubulin and FtsZ. Trends Cell Biol 1998, 8:133-137.
14. 14. Saraste M, Sibbald PR, Wittinghofer A: The P-loop: a common motif in ATP-and GTP-binding proteins. Trends Biochem Sci 1990, 15:430-434.
15. 15. Dai K, Mukherjee A, Xu Y, Lutkenhaus J: Mutations in FtsZ that confer resistance to SulA affect the interaction of FtsZ with GTP. J Bacteriol 1994, 175:130-136.
16. 16. Vogel JM, Stearns T, Rieder CL, Palazzo RE: Centrosomes isolated from Spisula solidissima oocytes contain rings and an unusual stoichiometric ratio of α/β tubulin. J Cell Biol 1997, 137:193-202.
17. 17. Erickson HP, Stoffler D: Protofilaments and rings, two conformations of the tubulin family conserved from bacterial FtsZ to α/β and γ tubulin. J Cell Biol 1996, 135:5-8.
18. 18. Dutcher SK, Trabuco EC: The UNI3 gene is required for assembly of basal bodies of Chlamydomonas and encodes δ-tubulin, a new member of the tubulin superfamily. Mol Biol Cell 1998, 9:1293-1308.
19. 19. Ludueña RF: The multiple forms of tubulin: different gene products and covalent modifications. Int Rev Cytol 1998, 178:207-275. A comprehensive review of the differences that exist among tubulin isotypes and that are introduced by post-translational modifications.
20. 20. Schwartz PM, Liggins JR, Ludueña RF: Beta-tubulin isotypes purified from bovine brain have different relative stabilities. Biochemistry 1998, 37:4687-4692. The properties of microtubules formed with different isotype compositions can be quite different; this paper describes differences among isolated dimers.
21. 21. Panda D, Miller HP, Banerjee A, Ludueña RF, Wilson L: Microtubule dynamics in vitro are regulated by the tubulin isotype composition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1994, 91:11358-11362.
22. 22. Ranganathan S, Benetatos CA, Clarusso PJ, Dexter DW, Hudes GR: Altered beta-tubulin isotype expression in paclitaxel-resistant human prostate carcinoma cells. Br J Cancer 1998, 77:562-566. Developed resistance to Taxol™ is a serious clinical problem. This paper, together with [23••], shows that some Taxol™ resistance can arise from a shift in tubulin isotype distribution towards isotypes that form more dynamic microtubules. See also [24•,37••].
23. 23. Kavallaris M, Kuo DY-S, Burkhart CA, Regl DL, Morris MD, Haber M, Horwitz SB: Taxol™-resistant epithelial ovarian tumors are associated with altered expression of specific β-tubulin isotypes. J Clin Invest 1997, 100:1282-1293. See annotation to [22••].
24. 24. Derry WB, Wilson L, Khan IA, Ludueña RF, Jordan MA: Taxol™ differentially modulates the dynamics of microtubules assembled from unfractionated and purified β-tubulin isotypes. Biochemistry 1997, 36:3554-3562. This demonstration of the fact that Taxol™ has dramatically different effects on microtubules formed with different tubulin isotypes provides the basis for understanding how cells adapt their isotype distribution when exposed to Taxol™.
25. 25. Raff EC, Fackenthal JD, Hutchens JA, Hoyle HD, Turner FR: Microtubule architecture specified by a β-tubulin isoform. Science 1997, 275:70-74.
26. 26. Hutchens JA, Hoyle HD, Turner FR, Raff EC: Structurally similar Drosophila alpha-tubulins are functionally distinct in vivo. Mol Biol Cell 1997, 8:481-500. The reasons that tubulin exists in so many different isotypes are still mostly unclear, but this work adds to the understanding of the role isotype differences play in forming particular sets of microtubules.
27. 27. Chen XY, Sullivan DS, Huffaker TC: Two yeast genes with similarity to TCP-1 are required for microtubule and actin function in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1994, 91:9111-9115.
28. 28. Ursic D, Sedbrook JC, Himmel KL, Culbertson MR: The essential yeast TCP-1 protein affects actin and microtubules. Mol Biol Cell 1994, 5:1065-1080.
29. 29. Tian G, Lewis SA, Feierbach B, Stearns T, Rommelaere H, Ampe C, Cowan NJ: Tubulin subunits exist in an activated conformational state generated and maintained by protein cofactors. J Cell Biol 1997, 138:821-832. The model for the involvement of cofactors A-E has come from a series of papers on the tubulin folding pathway. This paper fills in a major piece in the puzzle of how the various components interact.
30. 30. Archer JE, Vega LR, Solomon F: Rb12p, a yeast protein that binds to beta-tubulin and participates in microtubule function in vivo. Cell 1995, 82:425-434.
31. 31. Hirata D, Masuda H, Eddison M, Toda T: Essential role of tubulin-folding cofactor D in microtubule assembly and its association with microtubules in fission yeast. EMBO J 1998, 17:658-666.
32. 32. Menendez M, Rivas G, Diaz JF, Andreu JM: Control of the structural stability of the tubulin dimer by one high affinity bound magnesium ion at nucleotide N-site. J Biol Chem 1998, 273:167-176.
33. 33. Guha S, Bhattacharyya B: Refolding of urea-denatured tubulin: recovery of nativelike structure and colchicine binding activity from partly unfolded states. Biochemistry 1997, 36:13208-13213.
34. 34. Giraudel A, Lafenecher-e L, Ronjat M, Wehlend J, Garel J, Wilson L, Job D: Separation of tubulin subunits under nondenaturing conditions. Biochemistry 1998, 37:8724-8734. Tubulin monomers are generally thought to be highly unstable. The discovery of conditions that allow the reconstitution of dimers with a high fraction of the native polymerizing ability should provide insight into the nature and stability of the monomers at the intradimer interface.
35. 35. Rao S, Krauss NE, Heerding JM, Orr GA, Horwitz SB: 3′-(p-azidobenzamido)taxol™ photolabels the N-terminal 31 amino acids of β-tubulin. J Biol Chem 1994, 269:3132-3134.
36. 36. Rao S, Orr GA, Chaudhary AG, Kingston DGI, Horwitz SB: Characterization of the taxol™ binding site on the microtubule: 2-(m-azidobenzoyl)taxol™ photolabels a peptide (amino acids 217-231 ) of β-tubulin. J Biol Chem 1995, 270:20235-20238.
37. 37. Giannakakou P, Sackett DL, Kang Y-K, Zhan Z, Buters JTM, Fojo T, Poruchynsky MS: Paclitaxel-resistant human ovarian cancer cells have mutant β-tubulins that exhibit impaired paclitaxel-driven polymerization. J Biol Chem 1997, 272:17118-17125. The sequencing of tubulins from cell lines that are resistant to Taxol™ has shown two mutations that can be related to the Taxol™-binding site in the atomic structure. Either of these mutations could change the hydrophobic pocket that the C3′ sidechain sits in.
38. 38. Evangelio JA, Abal M, Barasoain I, Souto AA, Lillo MP, Acuna AU, Amat-Guerri F, Andreu JM: Fluorescent taxoids as probes of the microtubule cytoskeleton. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton 1998, 39:73-90.
39. 39. Loeb C, Combeau C, Ehret-Sabatier L, Breton-Gilet A, Faucher D, Rousseau B, Commerçon A, Goeldner M: [3H](azidophenyl)ureido taxoid photolabels peptide amino acids 281-304 of α-tubulin. Biochemistry 1997, 36:3820-3825.
40. 40. Downing KH, Nogales E: New insights into microtubule structure and function from the atomic model of tubulin. Eur Biophys J 1998, 27:431-436.
41. 41. Uppuluri S, Knipling L, Sackett DL, Wolff J: Localization of the colchicine-binding site of tubulin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1993, 90:11598-11602.
42. 42. Bai R, Pei X, Boye O, Getanunt Z, Grover S, Bektsz J, Nguyen N, Brossi A, Hamel E: Identification of cysteine 354 of β-tubulin as part of the binding site for the A ring of colchicine. J Biol Chem 1996, 271:12639-12645.
43. 43. Wolff J, Knipling L: Colchicine binding by the 'isolated' β-monomer of tubulin. J Biol Chem 1995, 270:16809-16812.
44. 44. Banerjee S, Chakrabarti G, Bhattacharyya B: Colchicine binding to tubulin monomers: a mechanistic study. Biochemistry 1997, 36:5600-5606.
45. 45. Man Y, Malak H, Chaudhary A, Chordia M, Kingston D, Bane S: Distances between the paclitaxel, colchicine, and exchangeable GTP binding sites on tubulin. Biochemistry 1998, 37:6636-6644.
46. 46. Andreu JM, Perez-Ramirez B, Gorbunoff MJ, Ayala D, Timasheff SN: Role of the colchicine ring A and its methoxy groups in the binding to tubulin and microtubule inhibition. Biochemistry 1998, 37:8356-8368.
47. 47. Garland DL: Kinetics and mechanisms of colchicine binding to tubulin: evidence for ligand-induced conformational change. Biochemistry 1978, 17:4266-4272.
48. 48. Diaz JF, Andreu JM: Kinetics of dissociation of the tubulin-colchicine complex. J Biol Chem 1991, 266:2890-2896.
49. 49. Banerjee A: Differential effects of colchicine and its B-ring modified analog MTPT on the assembly-independent GTPase activity of purified β-tubulin isoforms from bovine brain. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1997, 231:698-700. This paper complements the large amount of work on colchicine binding with the observation of isotype-specific differences in tubulin's GTPase activation. The B ring of colchicine appears to dominate the interaction with a tubulin and, thus, may be of particular importance in inducing conformational changes at the intradimer interface. Changes in the B ring have different effects on dimers formed with different β isotypes.
50. 50. Barbier P, Peyrot V, Leynadier D, Andreu JM: The active GTP-and ground GDP-liganded states of tubulin are distinguished by the binding of chiral isomers of ethyl-5-amino-2-methyl-1,2-dihydro-3-phenylpyrido [3,4-b] pyrazin-7-yl carbamate. Biochemistry 1998, 37:758-768. The nucleotide and colchicine-binding sites of tubulin are on nearly opposite sides of the molecule, yet colchicine binding has a significant effect on the intrinsic GTP hydrolysis rate. This paper presents the first demonstration of the fact that the difference between GTP and GDP can effect the binding of a drug at the colchicine site.