Configurai Weighting in Judgments of Two- and Four-Outcome Gambles

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 216-226

  Birnbaum, Michael H ^a,b   Veira, Richard ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Department of Statistics   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032388672     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.24.1.216     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Birnbaum, M. H. (1973). Morality judgment: Test of an averaging model with differential weights. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 99, 395-399.
2. Birnbaum, M. H. (1974a). The nonadditivity of personality impressions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 102, 543-561.
3. Birnbaum, M. H. (1974b). Using contextual effects to derive psychophysical scales. Perception & Psychophysics, 15, 89-96.
4. Birnbaum, M. H. (1982). Controversies in psychological measurement. In B. Wegener (Ed.), Social attitudes and psychophysical measurement (pp. 401-485). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Birnbaum, M. H. (1992a). Issues in utility measurement. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 52, 319-330.
6. Birnbaum, M. H. (1992b). Violations of monotonicity and contextual effects in choice-based certainty equivalents. Psychological Science, 3, 310-314.
7. Birnbaum, M. H. (1997). Violations of monotonicity in judgment and decision making. In A. A. J. Marley (Ed.), Choice, decision and measurement: Essays in honor of R. Duncan Luce (pp. 73-100). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. Birnbaum, M. H., & Beeghley, D. (1997). Violations of branch independence in judgments of the value of gambles. Psychological Science, 8, 87-94.
9. Birnbaum, M. H., & Chavez, A. (1997). Tests of theories of decision making: Violations of branch independence and distribution independence. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 71, 161-194.
10. Birnbaum, M. H., Coffey, G., Mellers, B. A., & Weiss, R. (1992). Utility measurement: Configural-weight theory and the judge's point of view. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 331-346.
11. Birnbaum, M. H., & McIntosh, W. R. (1996). Violations of branch independence in choices between gambles. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67, 91-110.
12. Birnbaum, M. H., & Sotoodeh, Y. (1991). Measurement of stress: Scaling the magnitudes of life changes. Psychological Science, 2, 236-243.
13. Birnbaum, M. H., & Stegner, S. E. (1979). Source credibility in social judgment: Bias, expertise, and the judge's point of view. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 48-74.
14. Birnbaum, M. H., & Stegner, S. E. (1981). Measuring the importance of cues in judgment for individuals: Subjective theories of IQ as a function of heredity and environment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 17, 159-182.
15. Birnbaum, M. H., & Sutton, S. E. (1992). Scale convergence and utility measurement. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 52, 183-215.
16. Birnbaum, M. H., & Thompson, L. A. (1996). Violations of monotonicity in choices between gambles and certain cash. American Journal of Psychology, 109, 501-523.
17. Birnbaum, M. H., Thompson, L. A., & Bean, D. J. (1997). Testing interval independence versus configurai weighting using judgments of strength of preference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 939-947.
18. Birnbaum, M. H., & Zimmermann, J. (1995, February). The Savage Memorial Lecture: Exploring the mind of Bob Citron. Paper presented at the Bayesian Research Conference, Studio City, CA.
19. Champagne, M., & Stevenson, M. K. (1994). Contrasting models of appraisal judgments for positive and negative purposes using policy modeling. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 59, 93-123.
20. Edwards, W. (1954). The theory of decision making. Psychological Bulletin, 51, 380-417.
21. Edwards, W. (Ed.). (1992). Utility theories: Measurements and applications. Boston: Kluwer Academic.
22. Ellsberg, D. (1961). Risk, ambiguity and the Savage axioms. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 75, 643-649.
23. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-291.
24. Krantz, D. H., Luce, D., Suppes, P., & Tversky, A. (1971). Foundations of measurement. New York: Academic Press.
25. Lopes, L. (1990). Re-modeling risk aversion: A comparison of Bernoullian and rank dependent value approaches. In G. M. v. Furstenberg (Ed.), Acting under uncertainty (pp. 267-299). Boston: Kluwer Academic.
26. Luce, R. D. (1992). Where does subjective expected utility fail descriptively? Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5, 5-27.
27. Luce, R. D., & Fishburn, P. C. (1991). Rank- and sign-dependent linear utility models for finite first order gambles. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 4, 29-59.
28. Luce, R. D., & Fishburn, P. C. (1995). A note on deriving rank-dependent utility using additive joint receipts. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 11, 5-16.
29. Luce, R. D., & Narens, L. (1985). Classification of concatenation measurement structures according to scale type. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 29, 1-72.
30. Machina, M. J. (1982). Expected utility analysis without the independence axiom. Econometrica, 50, 277-323.
31. Mellers, B. A., Ordóñez, L., & Birnbaum, M. H. (1992). A change-of-process theory for contextual effects and preference reversals in risky decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 52, 331-369.
32. Miyamoto, J. M. (1989). Generic utility theory: Measurement foundations and applications in multiattrihute utility theory. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 32, 357-404.
33. Parducci, A. (1963). The range-frequency compromise in judgment. Psychological Monographs, 77(2, Whole No. 565).
34. Parducci, A. (1995). Happiness, pleasure, and judgment. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
35. Quiggin, J. (1982). A theory of anticipated utility. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 3, 324-345.
36. Savage, L. J. (1954). The foundations of statistics. New York: Wiley.
37. Schmeidler, D. (1989). Subjective probability and expected utility without additivity. Econometrica, 57, 571-587.
38. Stevenson, M. K., Busemeyer, J. R., & Naylor, J. C. (1991). Judgment and decision-making theory. In M. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), New handbook of industrial-organizational psychology (pp. 283-374). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologist Press.
39. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1986). Rational choice and the framing of decisions. Journal of Business, 59, S251-S278.
40. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5, 297-323.
41. Tversky, A., & Wakker, P. (1995). Risk attitudes and decision weights. Econometrica, 63, 1255-1280.
42. von Winterfeldt, D., Chung, N., Luce, R. D., & Cho, Y. (1997). Tests of consequence monotonicity in decision making under uncertainty. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 406-426.
43. Wakker, P. (1993). Additive representations on rank-ordered sets. II. The topological approach. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 22, 1-26.
44. Wakker, P. (1994). Separating marginal utility and probabilistic risk aversion. Theory and Decision, 36, 1-44.
45. Wakker, P., Erev, I., & Weber, E. U. (1994). Comonotonic independence: The critical test between classical and rank-dependent utility theories. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 9, 195-230.
46. Weber, E. U. (1994). From subjective probabilities to decision weights: The effects of asymmetric loss functions on the evaluation of uncertain outcomes and events. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 228-242.
47. Weber, E. U., Anderson, C. J., & Birnbaum, M. H. (1992). A theory of perceived risk and attractiveness. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 52, 492-523.
48. Weber, E. U., & Kirsner, B. (1997). Reasons for rank-dependent utility evaluation. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 14, 41-61.
49. Wu, G., & Gonzalez, R. (1996). Curvature of the probability weighting function. Management Science, 42, 1676-1690.
50. Yaari, M. E. (1987). The dual theory of choice under risk. Econometrica, 55, 95-115.