Violations of monotonicity in choices between gambles and certain cash

American Journal of Psychology

Volumn 109, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 501-523

  Birnbaum, Michael H ^a   Thompson, Laura A ^a,b  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b BAYLOR UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0040064752     PISSN: 00029556     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/1423391     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Anderson, T., & Birnbaum, M. H. (1976). Test of an additive model of social inference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 655-662.
2. Birnbaum, M. H. (1974). The nonadditivity of personality impressions [Monograph]. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 102, 543-561.
3. Birnbaum, M. H. (1982). Controversies in psychological measurement. In B. Wegener (Ed.), Social attitudes andpsychophysical measurement (pp. 401-485). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Birnbaum, M. H. (1983). Scale convergence as a principle for the study of perception. In H.G. Geissler & V. Sarris (Eds.), Modern issues in perceptual psychology (pp. 319-335). Amsterdam: North Holland.
5. Birnbaum, M. H. (1992a). Issues in utility measurement. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 52, 319-330.
6. Birnbaum, M. H. (1992b). Violations of monotonicity and contextual effects in choice-based certainty equivalents. Psychological Science, 3, 310-314.
7. Birnbaum, M. H., & Beeghley, D. (in press). Violations of branch independence in judgments of the value of gambles. Psychological Science.
8. Birnbaum, M. H., Coffey, G., Mellers, B. A., &: Weiss, R. (1992). Utility measurement: Configural-weight theory and the judge's point of view. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 331-346.
9. Birnbaum, M. H., & McIntosh, W. R. (1996). Violations of branch independence in choices between gambles. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67, 91-110.
10. Birnbaum, M. H., & Sotoodeh, Y. (1991). Measurement of stress: Scaling the magnitudes of life changes, Psychological Science, 2, 236-243.
11. Birnbaum, M. H., & Stegner, S. E. (1979). Source credibility in social judgment: Bias, expertise, and the judge's point of view. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 48-74.
12. Birnbaum, M. H., & Sutton, S. E. (1992). Scale convergence and utility measurement. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 52, 183-215.
13. Bostic, R., Herrnstein, R. J., & Luce, R. D. (1990). The effect on the preference-reversal phenomenon of using choice indifference. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 13, 193-212.
14. Busemeyer, J. R. (1985). Decision making under uncertainty: Simple scalability, fixed sample, and sequential sampling models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11, 583-564.
15. Edwards, W. (1962). Subjective probabilities inferred from decisions. Psychological Review, 69, 109-135.
16. Krantz, D. H., Luce, R. D., Suppes, P. & Tversky, A. (1971). Foundations of measurement (Vol. 1). New York: Academic Press.
17. Lichtenstein, S., & Slovic, P. (1971). Reversals of preference between bids and choices in gambling decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 89, 46-55.
18. Lindman, H. R. (1971). Inconsistent preferences among gambles. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 89, 390-397.
19. Lopes, L. L. (1990). Re-modeling risk aversion: A comparison of Bernoullian and rank dependent value approaches. In G. M. von Fuerstenberg (Ed.), Acting under uncertainty: Multidisciplinary conceptions. Boston, MA: Kluwer.
20. Luce, R. D. (1986). Comments on Plott and on Kahneman, Knetsch, and Thaler. Journal of Business, 59, S337-S343.
21. Luce, R. D. (1992). Where does subjective expected utility fail descriptively? Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5, 5-27.
22. Luce, R. D., & Fishburn, P. C. (1991). Rank- and sign-dependent linear utility models for finite first order gambles. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 4, 29-59.
23. Luce, R. D., & Narens, L. (1985). Classification of concatenation measurement structures according to scale type. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 29, 1-72.
24. Mellers, B. A., Berretty, P. M., & Birnbaum, M. H. (1995). Dominance violations in judged prices of two- and three-outcome gambles. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 8, 201-216.
25. Mellers, B. A., & Biagini, K. (1994). Similarity and choice. Psychological Review, 101, 505-518.
26. Mellers, B. A., Chang, S., Birnbaum, M. H., & Ordóñez, L. (1992a). Preferences, prices, and ratings in risky decision making. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 347-361.
27. Mellers, B. A., Ordóñez, L., & Birnbaum, M. H. (1992b). A change of process theory for contextual effects and preference reversals in risky decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 52, 331-369
28. Mellers, B. A., Weiss, R., & Birnbaum, M. H. (1992c). Violations of dominance in pricing judgments. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5, 73-90.
29. Quiggin, J. (1982). A theory of anticipated utility. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 3, 323-343.
30. Savage, L. J. (1954). The foundations of statistics. New York: Wiley.
31. Shanteau, J., & Troutman, C. M. (1992). A psychophysical evaluation of diminishing returns in riskless decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 52, 569-579.
32. Slovic, P., Lichtenstein, S., & Fischhoff, B. (1988). Decision making. In R. C. Atkinson, R. J. Herrnstein, G. Lindzey, & R. D. Luce (Eds.), Stevens' handbook of experimental psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 673-738). New York: Wiley.
33. Stevenson, M. K., Busemeyer, J. R., & Naylor, J. C. (1991). Judgment and decision-making theory. In M. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), New handbook of industrial-organizational psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 283-374). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologist Press.
34. Thurstone, L. L. (1931). The indifference function. Journal of Social Psychology, 2, 139-167.
35. Tversky, A. (1969). Intransitivity of preferences. Psychological Review, 76, 31-48.
36. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1986). Rational choice and the framing of decisions. Journal of Business, 59, S251-S278.
37. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5, 297-324.
38. von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1947). Theory of games and economic behavior (2d ed.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
39. von Winterfeldt, D., Chung, N., Luce, R. D., & Cho, Y. (in press). Tests of consequence monotonicity in decision making under uncertainty. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition.
40. von Winterfeldt, D. & Edwards, W. (1986). Decision analysis and behavioral research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41. Wakker, P. (1993). Additive representations on rank-ordered sets, II. The topological approach. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 22, 1-26.
42. Wakker, P., Erev, I., & Weber, E. U. (1994). Comonotonic independence: The critical test between classical and rank-dependent utility theories. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 9, 195-230.
43. Weber, E. U. (1994). From subjective probabilities to decision weights: The effects of asymmetric loss functions on the evaluation of uncertain outcomes and events. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 228-242.
44. Weber, E. U., Anderson, C. J., & Birnbaum, M. H. (1992). A theory of perceived risk and attractiveness. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 52, 492-523.
45. Yaari, M. E. (1987). The dual theory of choice under risk. Econometrica, 55, 95-115.