Testing Interval Independence Versus Configural Weighting Using Judgments of Strength of Preference

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 939-947

  Birnbaum, Michael H ^a   Thompson, Laura A ^a   Bean, David J ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031477226     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.23.4.939     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Birnbaum, M. H. (1974). The nonadditivity of personality impressions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 102, 543-561.
2. Birnbaum, M. H. (1982). Controversies in psychological measurement. In B. Wegener (Ed.), Social attitudes and psychophysical measurement (pp. 401-485). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. Birnbaum, M. H. (1992a). Issues in utility measurement. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 52, 319-330.
4. Birnbaum, M. H. (1992b). Violations of monotonicity and contextual effects in choice-based certainty equivalents. Psychological Science, 3, 310-314.
5. Birnbaum, M. H., & Beeghley, D. (1997). Violations of branch independence in judgments of the value of gambles. Psychological Science, 8, 87-94.
6. Birnbaum, M. H., Coffey, G., Mellers, B. A., & Weiss, R. (1992). Utility measurement: Configural-weight theory and the judge's point of view. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 331-346.
7. Birnbaum, M. H., & McIntosh, W. R. (1996). Violations of branch independence in choices between gambles. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67, 91-110.
8. Birnbaum, M. H., & Sotoodeh, Y. (1991). Measurement of stress: Scaling the magnitudes of life changes. Psychological Science, 2, 236-243.
9. Birnbaum, M. H., & Stegner, S. E. (1979). Source credibility in social judgment: Bias, expertise, and the judge's point of view. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 48-74.
10. Birnbaum, M. H., & Sutton, S. E. (1992). Scale convergence and utility measurement. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 52, 183-215.
11. Birnbaum, M. H., & Thompson, L. A. (1996). Violations of monotonicity in choices between gambles and certain cash. American Journal of Psychology, 109, 501-523.
12. Birnbaum, M. H., & Veit, C. T. (1974). Scale-free tests of an averaging model for the size-weight illusion. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 276-282.
13. Bostic, R., Herrnstein, R. J., & Luce, R. D. (1990). The effect on the preference-reversal phenomenon of using choice indifference. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 13, 193-212.
14. Busemeyer, J. R. (1985). Decision making under uncertainty: Simple scalability, fixed sample, and sequential sampling models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11, 583-564.
15. Edwards, W. (1954). The theory of decision making. Psychological Bulletin, 51, 380-417.
16. Eisler, H. (1978). On the ability to estimate differences: A note on Birnbaum's subtractive model. Perception & Psychophysics, 24, 185-189.
17. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-291.
18. Lichtenstein, S., & Slovic, P. (1971). Reversals of preference between bids and choices in gambling decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 89, 46-55.
19. Lindman, H. R. (1971). Inconsistent preferences among gambles. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 89, 390-397.
20. Lopes, L. (1990). Re-modeling risk aversion: A comparison of Bernoullian and rank dependent value approaches. In G. M. v. Furstenberg (Ed.), Acting under uncertainty (pp. 267-299). Boston: Kluwer.
21. Luce, R. D. (1992). Where does subjective expected utility fail descriptively? Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5, 5-27.
22. Luce, R. D., & Fishburn, P. C. (1991). Rank- and sign-dependent linear utility models for finite first order gambles. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 4, 29-59.
23. Luce, R. D., & Narens, L. (1985). Classification of concatenation measurement structures according to scale type. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 29, 1-72.
24. Marks, L. E. (1979). A theory of loudness and loudness judgments. Psychological Review, 86, 256-285.
25. Mellers, B. A., & Biagini, K. (1994). Similarity and choice. Psychological Review, 101, 505-518.
26. Mellers, B. A., Chang, S., Birnbaum, M. H., & Ordóñez, L. (1992). Preferences, prices, and ratings in risky decision making. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 347-361.
27. Mellers, B. A., Ordóñez, L., & Birnbaum, M. H. (1992). A change of process theory for contextual effects and preference reversals in risky decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 52, 331-369.
28. Quiggin, J. (1982). A theory of anticipated utility. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 3, 324-345.
29. Rose, B. J., & Birnbaum, M. H. (1975). Judgments of differences and ratios of numerals. Perception & Psychophysics, 18, 194-200.
30. Savage, L. J. (1954). The foundations of statistics. New York: Wiley.
31. Slovic, P., Lichtenstein, S., & Fischhoff, B. (1988). Decision making. In R. C. Atkinson, R. J. Herrnstein, G. Lindzey, & R. D. Luce (Eds.), Stevens' handbook of experimental psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 673-738). New York: Wiley.
32. Stevenson, M. K. (1986). A discounting model for decisions with delayed positive or negative outcomes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 131-154.
33. Stevenson, M. K., Busemeyer, J. R., & Naylor, J. C. (1991). Judgment and decision-making theory. In M. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), New handbook of industrial-organizational psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 283-374). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
34. Tversky, A. (1969). Intransitively of preferences. Psychological Review, 76, 31-48.
35. Tversky, A. (1972). Elimination by aspects: A theory of choice. Psychological Review, 79, 281-299.
36. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5, 297-323.
37. Tversky, A., Sattath, S., & Slovic, P. (1988). Contingent weighting in judgment and choice. Psychological Review, 95, 371-384.
38. von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1947). Theory of games and economic behavior (2nd ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
39. von Winterfeldt, D., Chung, N., Luce, R. D., & Cho, Y. (1997). Tests of consequence monotonicity in decision making under uncertainty. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 406-426.
40. von Winterfeldt, D., & Edwards, W. (1986). Decision analysis and behavioral research. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
41. Wakker, P. (1993). Additive representations on rank-ordered sets, II: The topological approach. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 22, 1-26.
42. Wakker, P. (1994). Separating marginal utility and probabilistic risk aversion. Theory and decision, 36, 1-44.
43. Wakker, P., Erev, I., & Weber, E. U. (1994). Comonotonic independence: The critical test between classical and rank-dependent utility theories. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 9, 195-230.
44. Weber, E. U. (1994). From subjective probabilities to decision weights: The effects of asymmetric loss functions on the evaluation of uncertain outcomes and events. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 228-242.
45. Weber, E. U., Anderson, C. J., & Birnbaum, M. H. (1992). A theory of perceived risk and attractiveness. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 52, 492-523.