Random utility threshold models of subset choice

Australian Journal of Psychology

Volumn 50, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 175-185

  Regenwetter, Michel ^a   Marley, A A J ^b   Joe, H ^b  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032283967     PISSN: 00049530     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00049539808258794     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Barberá, S., & Pattanaik, P.K. (1986). Falmagne and the rationalizability of stochastic cho ces in terms of random orderings. Econometrica, 54, 707-715.
2. Block, H.D., & Marschak, J. (1960). Random orderings and stochastic theories of responses. In I. Olkin, S. Ghurye, H. Hoeffding, W. Madow, & H. Mann (Eds.), Contributions to probability and statistics (pp. 97-132). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
3. Clarke, F.R. (1957). Constant-ratio rule for confusion matrices in speech communication. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 29, 715-720.
4. Corbin, R., & Marley, A.A.J. (1974). Random utility models with equality: An apparent, but not actual, generalization of random utility models. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 11, 274-293.
5. Doignon, J.-P., & Regenwetter, M. (1997). An approval-voting polytope for linear orders. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 41, 171-188.
6. Falmagne, J.-C. (1973). A representation theorem for finite random scale systems. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 18, 52-72.
7. Falmagne, J.-C., & Regenwetter, M. (1996). Random utility models for approval voting. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 40, 152-159.
8. Fishburn, P.C. (1992). Induced binary probabilities and the linear ordering polytope: A status report. Mathematical Social Sciences, 23, 67-80.
9. Joe, H. (1997). Some properties of ranking, pairwise preference and choice probabilities for random utility models. Unpublished manuscript at Un versity of British Columbia, Vancouver.
10. Koppen, M. (1995). Random utility representation of binary choice probabilities: Critical graphs yielding critical necessary conditions. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 39, 21-39.
11. Luce, R.D. (1959). Individual choice behavior: A theoretical analysis. New York: Wiley.
12. Luce, R.D., & Suppes P. (1965). Preference, utility and subjective probability. In R.D. Luce, R.R. Bush, & E. Galanter (Eds.), Handbook of mathematical psychology (Vol. III, pp. 249-410). New York: Wiley.
13. Marley, A.A.J. (1993). Aggregation theorems and the combination of probabilistic rank orders. In D.E. Critchlow, M.A. Fligner, & J.S. Verducci (Eds.). Probability models and statistical analyses for ranking data (pp. 216-240). New York: Springer.
14. Niederée, R., & Heyer, D. (1997). Generalized random utility models and the representational theory of measurement: A conceptual link. In A.A.J. Marley (Ed.), Choice, decision and measurement: Essays in honor of R. Duncan Luce (pp. 155-189). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
15. Regenwetter, M. (1996). Random utility representations of finite m-ary relations. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 40, 219-234.
16. Regenwetter, M. (1997). Probabilistic preferences and topset voting. Mathematical Social Sciences, 34, 91-105.
17. Regenwetter, M., & Doignon, J.-P. (1998). The choice probabilities of the latent-scale model satisfy the size-independent model when n is small [Theoretical note]. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 42. 102-106.
18. Regenwetter, M., & Grofman, B. (1998a). Approval voting, Borda winners and Condorcet winners: Evidence from seven elections. Management Science, 44, 520-533.
19. Regenwetter, M., & Grofman, B. (1998b). Choosing subsets: A size-independent random utility model and the quest for a social welfare ordering. Social Choice and Welfare, 15, 423-443.
20. Suck, R. (1992). Geometric and combinatorial properties of the polytope of binary choice probabilities. Mathematical Social Sciences, 23, 81-102.
21. Tideman, N. (1995). Collective decisions and voting. Manuscript in preparation.
22. Tversky, A. (1972a). Choice by elimination. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 9, 340-367.
23. Tversky, A. (1972b). Elimination by aspects: A theory of choice. Psychological Review, 79, 281-299.