An approval-voting polytope for linear orders

Journal of Mathematical Psychology

Volumn 41, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 171-188

  Doignon, Jean Paul ^a   Regenwetter, Michel ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LIBRE DE BRUXELLES   (Belgium)

^b MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031165070     PISSN: 00222496     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jmps.1997.1155     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Brams S. J., Fishburn P. C. Approval Voting. 1983;Birkhäuser, Boston.
2. T. Christof, 1996, PORTA - A polyhedron representation transformation algorithm.
3. Dieudonné J. Foundations of Modern Analysis. 1960;Academic Press, New York.
4. Doignon J.-P., Falmagne J.-C. A polynomial time algorithm for unidimensional unfolding representations. Journal of Algorithms. 16:1994;218-233.
5. Dowling C. On the irredundant construction of knowledge spaces. Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 37:1993;49-62.
6. Falmagne J.-C., Regenwetter M. A random utility model for approval voting. Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 40:1996;152-159.
7. Fishburn P. C. Induced binary probabilities and the linear ordering polytope: A status report. Mathematical Social Sciences. 23:1992;67-80.
8. Grünbaum B. Convex Polytopes. 1967;Wiley, New York.
9. Harary F. Graph Theory. 1969;Addison-Wesley, Reading.
10. Koppen M. Random utility representations of binary choice probabilities: Critical graphs yielding critical necessary conditions. Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 39:1995;21-39.
11. Marley A. A. J. A historical and contemporary perspective on random scale representations of choice probabilities and reaction times in the context of Cohen and Falmagne's (1990,Journal of Mathematical Psychology34. Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 34:1990;81-87.
12. Merrill S. I. Making Multicandidate Elections More Democratic. 1988;Princeton Univ. Press, New Jersey.
13. Nurmi H. Comparing Voting Systems. 1987;Kluwer.
14. M. Regenwetter, 1995, Random utility representations and probabilistic models of subset choice and ranking data, Mathematical Behavioral Sciences, University of California, Irvine.
15. Regenwetter M. Random utility representations of finite m-ary relations. Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 40:1996;219-234.
16. Regenwetter M., Grofman B. Choosing subsets: A size-independent probabilistic model and the quest for a social welfare ordering. Social Choice and Welfare. 1995.
17. M. Regenwetter, B. Grofman, Approval voting, Borda winners and Condorcet winners: Evidence from seven elections, Management Science.
18. M. Regenwetter, A. Marley, H. Joe, 1996, Random utility threshold models of subset choice.
19. Sen A. K. A possibility theorem on majority decisions. Econometrica. 34:1966;491-499.
20. Suck R. Geometric and combinatorial properties of the polytope of binary choice probabilities. Mathematical Social Sciences. 23:1992;81-102.
21. R. Suck, 1996, Random utility representations based on semiorders, interval orders and partial orders.
22. Weber R. J. Approval voting. Journal of Economic Perspectives. 9:1995;39-49.
23. Ziegler G. M. Lectures on Polytopes. 1995;Springer-Verlag, Berlin.