Random utility representations of finite m-ary relations

Journal of Mathematical Psychology

Volumn 40, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 219-234

  Regenwetter, Michel ^a  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030240427     PISSN: 00222496     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jmps.1996.0022     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Barberá, S., & Pattanaik, P. K. (1986). Falmagne and the rationalizability of stochastic choices in terms of random orderings. Econometrica, 54, 707-715.
2. Block, H. D., & Marschak, J. (1960). Random orderings and stochastic theories of responses. In I. Olkin, S. Ghurye, H. Hoeffding, W. Madow, & H. Mann (Eds.), Contributions to probability and statistics (pp. 97-132). Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press.
3. Brams, S. J., & Fishburn, P. C. (1983). Approval voting. Boston: Birkhäuser.
4. Brams, S. J., & Fishburn, P. C. (1988). Does approval voting elect the lowest common denominator? PS: Political Science & Politics, 21, 277-284.
5. Brams, S. J., & Fishburn, P. C. (1992). Approval voting in scientific and engineering societies. Group Decision and Negotiation, 1, 41-55.
6. Brams, S. J., & Nagel, J. H. (1991). Approval voting in practice. Public Choice, 71, 1-17.
7. Cho, Y., Luce, R. D., & von Winterfeldt, D. (1994). Tests of assumptions about the joint receipt of gambles in rank-and sign-dependent utility theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 931-943.
8. Corbin, R., & Marley, A. A. J. (1974). Random utility models with equality: An apparent, but not actual, generalization of random utility models. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 11, 274-293.
9. Doignon, J.-P., & Regenwetter, M. (1996). The approval-voting polytope for linear orders (submitted).
10. Falmagne, J.-C. (1978). A representation theorem for finite random scale systems. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 18, 52-72.
11. Falmagne, J.-C. (1983). A random utility model for a belief function. Synthèse, 57, 35-48.
12. Falmagne, J.-C., & Regenwetter, M. (1996). A random utility model for approval voting. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 40, 152-159.
13. Falmagne, J.-C., Regenwetter, M., & Grofman, B. (in press). A stochastic model for the evolution of preferences. In A. A. J. Marley (Ed.), Choice, decision, and measurement. Essays in honor of R. Duncan Luce. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
14. Fishburn, P. C. (1979). Utility theory for decision making. Huntington, NY: Krieger.
15. Fishburn, P. C. (1992). Induced binary probabilities and the linear ordering polytope: A status report. Mathematical Social Sciences, 23, 67-80.
16. Fishburn, P. C., & Luce, R. D. (1995). Joint receipt and Thaler's hedonic editing rule. Mathematical Social Sciences, 29, 33-76.
17. Heyer, D., & Niederée, R. (1989). Elements of a model-theoretic framework for probabilistic measurement. In E. E. Roskam (Ed.), Mathematical psychology in progress (pp. 99-112). Berlin: Springer.
18. Heyer, D., & Niederée, R. (1992). Generalizing the concept of binary choice systems induced by rankings: One way of probabilizing deterministic measurement structures. Mathematical Social Sciences, 23, 31-44.
19. Koppen, M. (1995). Random utility representation of binary choice probabilities: Critical graphs yielding critical necessary conditions. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 39, 21-39.
20. Krantz, D. H., Luce, R. D., Suppes, P., & Tversky, A. (1971). Foundations of measurement (Vol. 1). San Diego: Academic Press.
21. Luce, R. D. (1991). Rank-and sign-dependent linear utility models for binary gambles. Journal of Economic Theory, 53, 75-100.
22. Luce, R. D. (1995). Joint receipt and certainty equivalents of gambles. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 39, 73-81.
23. Luce, R. D., & Fishburn, P. C. (1991). Rank-and sign-dependent linear utility models for finite first order gambles. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 4, 29-59.
24. Luce, R. D., & Fishburn, P. C. (1995). A note on deriving rank-dependent utility using additive joint receipts. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 11, 5-16.
25. Luce, R. D., Krantz, D. H., Suppes, P., & Tversky, A. (1990). Foundations of measurement (Vol. 3). San Diego: Academic Press.
26. Marley, A. A. J. (1990). A historical and contemporary perspective on random scale representations of choice probabilities and reaction times in the context of Cohen and Falmagne's (1990, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 34) results. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 34, 81-87.
27. Merrill, S. I. (1988). Making multicandidate elections more democratic. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.
28. Miller, W. E., Kinders D. R., Rosenstone, S. J., & NES (1993). American national election study. 1992. Pre-and post-election survey (3 vols.). Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research.
29. Niederée, R., & Heyer, D. (1996). Generalized random utility models and the representational theory of measurement: a conceptual link. In A. A. J. Marley (Ed.), Choice, decision, and measurement: Essays in honor of R. Duncan Luce. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
30. Regenwetter, M. (1996). Probabilistic preferences and topset voting (submitted).
31. Regenwetter, M., Falmagne, J.-C., & Grofman, B. (1995). A stochastic model of preference change and its application to 1992 presidential election panel data (submitted); also available as MBS 95-30 Technical Report at the IMBS, University of California, Irvine.
32. Regenwetter, M., & Grofman, B. (1995a). Approval voting, Borda winners and Condorcet winners: Evidence from seven elections (submitted); based on MBS 94-20 Technical Report at the IMBS, University of California, Irvine.
33. Regenwetter, M., & Grofman, B. (1995b). Choosing subsets: A probabilistic model and the quest for a social welfare ordering (submitted); based on MBS 94-20 Technical Report at the IMBS, University of California, Irvine.
34. Regenwetter, M., & Marley, A. A. J. (1996). Random relations, random utilities, and random functions (submitted).
35. Regenwetter, M., Marley, A., & Joe, H. (1996). Random utility threshold models of subset choice (submitted).
36. Roberts, F. S. (1979). Measurement theory. London: Addison-Wesley.
37. Scott, D., & Suppes. P. (1958). Foundational aspects of theories of measurement. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 23, 113-128.
38. Suck, R. (1992). Geometric and combinatorial properties of the polytope of binary choice probabilities. Mathematical Social Sciences, 23, 81-102.
39. Suck, R. (1995). Random utility representations based on semiorders, interval orders, and partial orders (submitted).
40. Suppes, P., Krantz, D. H., Luce, R. D., & Tversky, A. (1989). Foundations of measurement (Vol. II). San Diego: Academic Press.