Magnetic fields elicited by tones and vowel formants reveal tonotopy and nonlinear summation of cortical activation

Psychophysiology

Volumn 34, Issue 5, 1997, Pages 501-510

  Diesch, Eugen ^a   Luce, Thomas ^b  

^a TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Auditory cortex; MEG; N1m; Nonlinearity; SF; Tonotopy

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY CORTEX; DIPOLE; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LATENT PERIOD; MAGNETIC FIELD; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; NONLINEAR SYSTEM; NORMAL HUMAN; PHONETICS; PITCH; POWER SPECTRUM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PURE TONE AUDIOMETRY; SPATIAL SUMMATION; TONOTOPY; VOWEL;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; AUDITORY CORTEX; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMANS; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NONLINEAR DYNAMICS; PITCH PERCEPTION; SPEECH;

EID: 0030868509     PISSN: 00485772     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1997.tb01736.x     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Arezzo, J., Pickoff, A., & Vaughan, H. G., Jr. (1975). The sources and intracerebral distribution of auditory evoked potentials in the alert rhesus monkey. Brain Research, 90, 57-73.
2. Arthur, D. L., Lewis, P. S., Medvick, P. A., & Flynn, E. R. (1991). A neuromagnetic study of selective auditory attention. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 78, 348-360.
3. Berg, P., & Scherg, M. (1994). A multiple source approach to the correction of eye artifacts. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 90, 229-241.
4. Chuang, C.-K., & Wang, W. (1978). Psychophysical pitch biases related to vowel quality, intensity difference, and sequential order. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 64, 1004-1014.
5. Csépe, V., Pantev, C., Hoke, M., Hampson, S., & Ross, B. (1992). Evoked magnetic responses of the human auditory cortex to minor pitch changes: Localization of the mismatch field. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 84, 538-548.
6. Diesch, E., Eulitz, C., Hampson, S., & Ross, B. (1996). The neurotopography of vowels as mirrored by evoked magnetic field measurements. Brain and Language, 53, 141-168.
7. Drung, D., Zimmermann, R., Cantor, R., Erné, S. N., Koch, H., Matthies, K. P., Peters, M., Scheer, H. J., & Stollfuß, D. (1991). A 37-channel DC SQUID magnetometer system. Clinical Physics and Physiological Measurement, 12(Suppl. B). 21-29.
8. Erné, S. N., Hahlbohm, H.-D., Scheer, H., & Trontelj, Z. (1981). The Berlin magnetically shielded room (BMSR) section B: Performances, In S. N. Erné, H.-D. Hahlbohm, & H. Lübbig (Eds.). Biomagnetism (pp. 79-87). Berlin: de Gruyter.
9. Erné, S. N., Scheer, H. J., Hoke, M., Pantev, C., & Lütkenhöner, B. (1987). Brainstem auditory evoked magnetic fields in response to stimulation with brief tone pulses. International Journal of Neuroscience, 37, 115-125.
10. Farnsworth, P. R. (1937). An approach to the study of vocal resonance. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 9, 152-155.
11. Hari, R., Hämäläinen, M., Kaukoranta, J., Mäkelä, J. P., Joutsiniemi, S.-L., & Tiihonen. J. (1989). Selective listening modifies activity of the human auditory cortex. Experimental Brain Research, 74, 463-470.
12. Hari, R., Kaila, K., Katila, T., Tuomisto, T., & Varpula, T. (1982). Interstimulus interval dependence of the auditory vertex response and its magnetic counterpart: Implications for their neural generation. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 54, 561-569.
13. Hillyard, S., Hink, R., Schwent, V., & Picton, T. (1973). Electrical signs of selective attention in the human brain. Science, 182, 177-180.
14. Huotilainen, M., Tiitinen, H., Lavikainen, J., Ilmoniemi, R. J., Pekkonen, E., Sinkkonen, J., Laine, P., & Näätänen, R. (1995). Sustained fields of tones and glides reflect tonotopy of the auditory cortex. NeuroReport, 6, 841-844.
15. Klatt, D. H., & Klatt, L. C. (1990). Analysis, synthesis and perception of voice quality variations among female and male talkers. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 87, 820-857.
16. Kuriki, S., & Murase, M. (1989). Neuromagnetic study of the auditory responses in right and left hemispheres of the human brain evoked by pure tones and speech sounds. Experimental Brain Research, 77, 127-134.
17. Kuriki, S., Okita, Y., & Hirata, Y. (1995). Source analysis of magnetic field responses from the human auditory cortex elicited by short speech sounds. Experimental Brain Research, 104, 144-152.
18. Liberman, A. M., Cooper, F. S., Shankweiler, D. P., & Studdert-Kennedy, M. (1967). Perception of the speech code. Psychological Review, 74, 431-461.
19. Liberman, A. M., & Mattingly, I. G. (1985). The motor theory of speech perception revised. Cognition, 21, 1-36.
20. Mäkelä, J. P., Hämäläinen, M., Hari, R., & McEvoy, L. (1994), Whole-head mapping of middle-latency auditory evoked magnetic fields. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 92, 414-421.
21. Merzenich, M. M., & Brugge, J. F. (1973). Representation of the cochlear partition on the superior temporal plane of the macaque monkey. Brain Research, 50, 275-296.
22. Merzenich, M. M., Knight, P. L., & Linn-Roth, G. (1975). Representation of the cochlea within primary auditory cortex in the cat. Journal of Neurophysiology, 38, 231-249.
23. Moore, B. C. J. (1989). An introduction to the psychology of hearing (3rd ed.). London: Academic Press.
24. Moore, B. C. J., Glasberg, B. R., & Proctor, G. M. (1992). Accuracy of pitch matching for pure tones and for complex tones with overlapping or nonoverlapping harmonics. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 91, 3443-3450.
25. Näätänen, R. (1992). Attention and brain function. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
26. Näätänen, R., Gaillard, A. W. K., & Mäntysalo, S. (1978). The N1 effect of selective attention reinterpreted. Acta Psychologica, 42, 313-329.
27. Näätänen, R., & Picton, T. (1987). The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: A review and an analysis of the component structure. Psychophysiology, 24, 375-425.
28. Näätänen, R., Simpson, M., & Loveless, N. E. (1982). Stimulus deviance and evoked potentials. Biological Psychology, 14, 53-98.
29. Nakasato, N., Fujita, S., Seki, K., Kawamura, T., Matani, A., Tamura, I., Fujiwara, S., & Yoshimoto, T. (1995). Functional localization of bilateral auditory cortices using an MRI-linked whole head magnetoencephalography (MEG) system. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 94, 183-190.
30. Novak, G. P., Ritter, W., Vaughan, H. G., Jr., & Wiznitzer, M. L. (1990). Differentiation of negative event-related potentials in an auditory discrimination task. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 75, 255-275.
31. Nunez, P. L. (1986). The brain's magnetic field: Some effects of multiple sources on localization methods. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 63, 75-82.
32. Pantev, C., Bertrand, O., Eulitz, C., Verkindt, C., Hampson, S., Schuierer G., & Elbert, T. (1995). Specific tonotopic organizations of different areas of the human auditory cortex revealed by simultaneous magnetic and electric recordings. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 94, 26-40.
33. Pantev, C., Elbert, T., Ross, B., Eulitz, C., & Terhardt, E. (1996). Binaural fusion of virtual pitch in the human auditory cortex [Abstract]. In C. C. Wood (Ed.), Tenth International Conference on Biomagnetism, Santa Fe, New Mexico (p. 80).
34. Pantev, C., Eulitz, C., Elbert, T., & Hoke, M. (1994). The auditory evoked sustained field: Origin and frequency dependence. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 90, 82-90.
35. Pantev, C., Hoke, M., Lehnertz, K., Lütkenhöner, B., Anogianakis, G., & Wittkowski, W. (1988). Tonotopic organization of the human auditory cortex revealed by transient auditory evoked magnetic fields. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 69, 160-170.
36. Pantev, C., Hoke, M., Lehnertz, K., Lütkenhöner, B., & Kumpf, W. (1990). Identification of sources of brain neuronal activity with high spatio-temporal resolution through combination of neuromagnetic source localization (NMSL) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 75, 173-184.
37. Pantev, C., Hoke, M., Lütkenhöner, B., & Lehnertz, K. (1989). Tonotopic organization of the auditory cortex: Pitch versus frequency representation. Science, 246, 486-488.
38. Pellizone, M., Hari, R., Mäkelä, J. P., Huttunen, J., Ahlfors, S., & Hämäläinen, M. (1987). Cortical origin of middle latency auditory evoked responses in man. Neuroscience Letters, 82, 303-307.
39. Phillips, D. P. (1993). Representation of acoustic events in the primary auditory cortex. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 203-216.
40. Pickett, J. M. (1980). The sounds of speech communication: A primer of acoustic phonetics and speech communication. Baltimore: University Park Press.
41. Picton, T. W., Stapells, D. R., & Campbell, K. B. (1981). Auditory evoked potentials from the human cochlea and brainstem. Journal of Otolaryngology, 10, 1-41.
42. Picton, T. W., Woods, D. L., & Proulx, G. B. (1978a). Human auditory sustained potentials. I. The nature of the response. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 45, 186-197.
43. Picton, T. W., Woods, D. L., & Proulx, G. B. (1978b). Human auditory sustained potentials. II. Stimulus relationships. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 45, 198-210.
44. Richer, F., Alain, C., Achim, A., Bouvier, G., & Saint-Hilaire, J.-M. (1989). Intracerebral amplitude distributions of the auditory evoked potential. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 74, 202-208.
45. Rif, J., Hari, R., Hämäläinen, M. S., & Sams, M. (1991). Auditory attention affects two different areas in the human supratemporal cortex. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 79, 464-472.
46. Rogers, R. L., Papanicolaou, A. C., Baumann, S. B., Eisenberg, H. M., & Saydjari, C. (1990). Spatially distributed cortical excitation patterns of auditory processing during contralateral and ipsilateral stimulation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 2, 44-50.
47. Romani, G. L., Williamson, S. J., & Kaufman, L. (1982). Characterization of the human auditory cortex by the neuromagnetic method. Experimental Brain Research 47, 381-393.
48. Sachs, M. B., & Kiang, N. Y.-S. (1968). Two-tone inhibition in auditory-nerve fibers. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America, 68, 858-875.
49. Sarvas, J. (1987). Basic mathematical and electromagnetic concepts of the biomagnetic inverse problem. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 32, 11-22.
50. Scherg, M. (1990). Fundamentals of dipole source analysis. In F. Grandori, M. Hoke, & G. L. Romani (Eds.), Auditory magnetic fields and electric potentials. Advances in audiology (Vol. 6, pp. 40-69). Basel: Karger.
51. Scherg, M., Hari, R., & Hämäläinen, M. (1989). Frequency-specific sources of the auditory N19-P30-P50 response detected by a multiple source analysis of evoked magnetic fields and potentials. In S. J. Williamson, M. Hoke, M. Kotani, & G. Stroink (Eds.). Advances in biomagnetism. New York: Plenum.
52. Scherg, M., Vajsar, J., & Picton, T. W. (1989). A source analysis of the late human auditory potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 1, 336-355.
53. Scherg, M., & von Cramon, D. (1985). A new interpretation of the generators of BAEP waves I-V: Results of a spatio-temporal dipole model. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 62, 290-299.
54. Scherg, M., & von Cramon, D. (1986). Evoked dipole source potentials of the human auditory cortex. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 65, 344-360.
55. Steinschneider, M., Arezzo, J. C., & Vaughan, H. G., Jr. (1990). Tonotopic features of speech-evoked activity in primate auditory cortex. Brain Research, 519, 158-168.
56. Terhardt, E., Stoll, G., & Seewann, M. J. (1982a). Pitch of complex signals according to virtual pitch theory: Tests, examples, and predictions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 71, 671-678.
57. Terhardt, E., Stoll, G., & Seewann. M. J. (1982b). Algorithm for extraction of pitch and pitch salience from complex tonal signals. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 71, 679-688.
58. Tesche, C. D., Uusitalo, M. A., Ilmoniemi, R. J., Huotilainen, M., Kajola, M., & Salonen, O. (1995). Signal-space projections of MEG data characterize both distributed and well-localized neuronal sources. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 95, 189-200.
59. Thomas, I. B. (1969). Perceived pitch of whispered vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 46, 468-470.
60. Thornton, A., Mendel, M. L. & Anderson, C. (1977). Effects of stimulus frequency and intensity on the middle components of the averaged auditory EEG response. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 20, 81-94.
61. Vaughan, H. G., & Ritter, W. (1970). The sources of auditory evoked responses recorded from the human scalp. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 28, 360-367.
62. Williamson, S. J., Lu, Z.-L., Karron, D., & Kaufman, L. (1991). Advantages and limitations of magnetic source imaging. Brain Topography, 4, 169-179.
63. Wolpaw, J. R., & Penry, J. K. (1975). A temporal component of the auditory evoked response. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 43, 99-102.