Mismatch field to tone pairs: Neuromagnetic evidence for temporal integration at the sensory level

Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology - Evoked Potentials

Volumn 104, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 1-9

  Csepe V ^a   Pantev, C ^b   Hoke, M ^a   Ross, B ^a   Hampson, S ^a  

^a Institute of Experimental Audiology   (Germany)

^b INSTITUTE FOR PSYCHOLOGY   (Hungary)

Author keywords

auditory evoked magnetic field; human auditory cortex; mismatch field; neuromagnetic source localization; paired and single tones

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY CORTEX; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MAGNETIC FIELD; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SENSORY SYSTEM;

EID: 0031057751     PISSN: 01685597     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0168-5597(96)93703-X     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Amaral, D.G., Insausti, R. and Cowan, W.M. Evidence for a direct projection from the superior temporal gyrus to the entorhinal cortex in the monkey. Brain Res., 1983, 275: 263-277.
2. Barbas, H. and Mesulam, M.M. Organization of afferent input to subdivisions of area 8 in the rhesus monkey. J. Comp. Neurol., 1981, 200: 407-432.
3. Csépe, V., Pantev, C., Hoke, M., Hampson, S. and Ross, B. Evoked magnetic responses of the human auditory cortex to minor pitch changes: localization of the mismatch field. Electroencephalogr. clin. Neurophysiol., 1992, 84: 538-548.
4. Galaburda, A.M. and Pandya, D.N. The intrinsic architectonic and connectional organization of the superior temporal region of the rhesus monkey. J. Comp. Neurol., 1983, 221: 169-184.
5. Giard, M.H., Perrin, P. and Pernier, J. Brain generators implicated in processing of auditory stimulus deviance: a topographic ERP study. Psychophysiology, 1990, 27: 627-640.
6. Giard, M.H., Lavikeinen, J., Reinikainen, K., Perrin, F., Bertrand, O., Thévenet, M., Pernier, J and Näätänen, R. Separate representation of stimulus frequency, intensity, and duration in auditory sensory memory. J. Cogn. Neurosci., 1995, 7: 133-143.
7. Hari, R., Hämäläinen, M., Ilmoniemi, R., Kaukoranta, E., Reinikainen, K., Salminen, J., Alho, K., Näätänen, R. and Sams, M. Responses of the primary auditory cortex to pitch changes of tone pips: neuromagnetic recordings in man. Neurosci. Lett., 1984, 50: 127-132.
8. Hari, R., Rif, J. Tiihonen, J. and Sams, M. Neuromagnetic mismatch fields to single and paired tones. Electroencephalogr. clin. Neurophysiol., 1992, 82: 152-154.
9. Imada, T., Hari, R., Loveless, N., McEvoy, L. and Sams, M. Determinants of the auditory mismatch response, Electroencephalogr. clin. Neurophysiol., 1993, 87: 144-153.
10. Loveless, N. and Hari, R. Auditory evoked fields covary with perceptual grouping. Biol. Psychol., 1993, 35: 1-15.
11. Loveless, N., Hari, R. Hämäläinen, M. and Tiihonen, J. Evoked responses of human auditory cortex may be enhanced by preceding stimuli. Electroencephalogr. clin. Neurophysiol., 1989, 74: 217-227.
12. Mäntysalo, S. and Näätänen, R. The duration of a neuronal trace of an auditory stimulus as indicated by event-related potentials. Biol. Psychol., 1987, 24: 183-195.
13. Näätänen, R. The role of attention in auditory information processing as revealed by event-related potentials and other brain measures of cognitive function, Behav. Brain Sci., 1990, 13: 201-288.
14. Näätänen, R. Attention and Brain Function. Hillsdale, Lawrence Erlbaum, New Jersey, 1992.
15. Näätänen, R., Paavilainen, P., Tiitinen, H., Jiang, D. and Alho, K. Attention and mismatch negativity, Psychophysiology, 1993, 30: 436-450.
16. Näätänen, R. and Picton, T.W. The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: a review and an analysis of the component structure. Psychophysiology, 1987, 24: 375-425.
17. Paavilainen, P., Alho, K., Reinikainen, K., Sams, M. and Näätänen, R. Right hemisphere dominance of different mismatch negativities. Electroencephalogr. clin. Neurophysiol., 1991, 78: 466-479.
18. Pantev, C. Neuromagnetic source localization using a large array biomagnetometer. Biomed. Res., 1992, 13 (Suppl. 1): 11-16.
19. Pantev, C., Gallen, C., Hampson, S., Buchanan, S. and Sobel, D. Reproducibility and validity of neuromagnetic source localization using a large array biomagnetometer. Am. J. EEG Technol., 1991, 31: 83-101.
20. Sams, M., Hari, R., Rif, J. and Knuutila, J. The human auditory sensory memory trace persists about 10 s: neuromagnetic evidence. J. Cogn. Neurosci., 1993, 5: 363-370.
21. Sams, M., Kaukoranta, E., Hämäläinen, M. and Näätänen, R. Cortical activity elicited by changes in auditory stimuli: different sources for the magnetic N100m and mismatch responses. Psychophysiology, 1991, 28: 21-29.
22. Scharf, B. and Buus, S. Audition I: Stimulus, physiology, thresholds. In: K.R. Boff, L. Kaufman and J.P. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of Perception and Human Performance, 14. Wiley, New York, 1986, pp. 1-71.
23. Scherg, M., Vajsar, J. and Picton, T.W. A source analysis of the human auditory evoked potentials. J. Cogn. Neurosci., 1989, 1: 336-355.
24. Tiitinen, H., Alho, K., Huotilainen, M., Ilmoniemi, R.J., Simola, J. and Näätänen, R. Tonotopic auditory cortex and the magnetoencephalographic (MEG) equivalent of the mismatch negativity, Psychophysiology, 1993, 30: 537- 540.
25. Winkler, I. and Näätänen, R. Event-related potentials in auditory backward recognition masking: a new way to study the neurophysiological basis of sensory memory in humans. Neurosci. Lett., 1992, 140: 239-242.
26. Woldorff, M.G., Hackley, S.A. and Hillyard, S.A. The effects of channel-selective attention on the mismatch negativity wave elicited by deviant tones. Psychophysiology, 1991, 28: 30-42.