Simplified proteins: Minimalist solutions to the 'protein folding problem'

Current Opinion in Structural Biology

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 80-85

  Plaxco, Kevin W ^a   Riddle, David S ^a   Grantcharova, Viara ^a   Baker, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; KINETICS; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN SYNTHESIS; REVIEW;

EID: 0032005126     PISSN: 0959440X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0959-440X(98)80013-4     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Irback A, Peterson C, Potthast F. Evidence for nonrandom hydrophobicity structures in protein chains. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 93:1996;9533-9538.
2. West MW, Hecht MH. Binary patterning of polar and nonpolar amino acids in the sequences and structures of native proteins. Protein Sci. 4:1995;2032-2039.
3. Wootton JC. Sequences with 'unusual' amino acid compositions. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 4:1994;413-421.
4. Chothia C, Gerstein M. How far can sequences diverge? Nature. 385:1997;579-581.
5. of outstanding interest Beasley JR, Hecht MH. Protein design: the choice of de novo sequences. J Biol Chem. 272:1997;2031-2034 An excellent review of the sequence determinants of protein structure. The authors place particular emphasis on the role played by simple binary patterns in encoding the three-dimensional structure of the native state.
6. Sauer RT. Protein folding from a combinatorial perspective. Fold Des. 1:1996;R27-R30.
7. Bromberg S, Dill KA. Side-chain entropy and packing in proteins. Protein Sci. 3:1994;997-1009.
8. Behe MJ, Lattman EE, Rose GD. The protein-folding problem: the native fold determines packing, but does packing determine the native fold? Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 88:1991;4195-4199.
9. Ponder JW, Richards FM. Tertiary templates for proteins. Use of packing criteria in the enumeration of allowed sequences for different structural classes. J Mol Biol. 193:1987;775-791.
10. Crick FHC. The packing of α-helices: simple coiled-coils. Acta Crystallogr. 6:1953;689-697.
11. O'Brien R, Wynn R, Driscoll PC, Davis B, Plaxco KW, Sturtevant JM, Ladbury JE. The adaptability of Escherichia coli thioredoxin to non-conservative amino acid substitutions. Protein Sci. 6:1997;1325-1332.
12. Axe DD, Foster NW, Fersht AR. Active barnase variants with completely random hydrophobic cores. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 93:1996;5590-5594.
13. Clarke ND. Sequence 'minimization': exploring the sequence landscape with simplified sequences. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 6:1995;467-472.
14. Munson M, O'Brien R, Sturtevant JM, Regan L. Redesigning the hydrophobic core of a four-helix-bundle protein. Protein Sci. 3:1994;2015-2022.
15. Munson M, Balasubramanian S, Fleming KG, Nagi AD, O'Brien R, Sturtevant JM, Regan L. What makes a protein a protein? Hydrophobic core designs that specify stability and structural properties. Protein Sci. 5:1996;1584-1593.
16. of outstanding interest Gassner NC, Baase WA, Matthews BW. A test of the 'jigsaw puzzle' model for protein folding by multiple methionine substitutions within the core of T4 lysozyme. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 93:1996;12155-12158 This crystallographic and thermodynamic study of T4 lysozyme variants with significantly simplified hydrophobic cores demonstrates clearly the extraordinary degree of core compositional simplicity that a globular protein can accommodate and poses a serious challenge to the 'jigsaw puzzle' model of core packing and protein structure.
17. Desjarlais JR, Handel TM. De novo design of the hydrophobic cores of proteins. Protein Sci. 4:1995;2006-2018.
18. Michael SF, Kilfoil VJ, Schmidt MH, Amann BT, Berg JM. Metal binding and folding properties of a minimalist Cys2His2 zinc finger peptide. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 8:1992;4796-4800.
19. Shang Z, Isaac VE, Li H, Patel L, Catron KM, Curran T, Montelione GT, Abate C. Design of a 'minimAl' homeodomain: the N-terminal arm modulates DNA binding affinity and stabilizes homeodomain structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 91:1994;8373-8377.
20. Kamtekar S, Schiffer JM, Xiong H, Babik JM, Hecht MH. Protein design by binary patterning of polar and nonpolar amino acids. Science. 265:1993;1680-1685.
21. of special interest Roy S, Helmer KJ, Hecht MH. Detecting native-like properties in combinatorial libraries of de novo proteins. Fold Des. 2:1997;89-92 NMR is used in this study to investigate the nativeness of representative proteins derived from a library of random sequences that conform to a binary pattern thought to encode four-helix bundle proteins.
22. DeGrado WF, Wasserman ZR, Lear JD. Protein design, a minimalist approach. Science. 243:1989;622-628.
23. Regan L, DeGrado WF. Characterization of a helical protein designed from first principles. Science. 241:1988;976-978.
24. Handel TM, Williams SA, DeGrado WF. Metal ion-dependent modulation of the dynamics of a designed protein. Science. 261:1993;879-885.
25. Gu H, Yi Q, Bray ST, Riddle DS, Shiau AK, Baker D. A phage display system for studying the sequence determinants of protein folding. Protein Sci. 4:1995;1108-1117.
26. of outstanding interest Riddle DS, Santiago JV, Bray ST, Doshi N, Grantcharova V, Yi Q, Baker D. Functional rapidly folding proteins from simplified amino acid sequences. Nat Struct Biol. 4:1997;805-809 A phage display technique was used to select for significantly simplified proteins that adopt an SH3 domain fold. These studies suggest that a five-letter alphabet is the minimal compositional complexity required to generate this predominantly β-sheet fold. The rapid folding of the highly simplified variants recovered in this work (one folds 50% more rapidly than the wild-type sequence from which it was derived) suggests that sequence complexity of naturally occurring proteins is not required to generate rapidly folding species.
27. Cordes MHJ, Davidson AR, Sauer RT. Sequence space, folding and protein design. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 6:1996;3-10.
28. Davidson AR, Sauer RT. Folded proteins occur frequently in libraries of random amino acid sequences. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 91:1994;2146-2150.
29. Davidson AR, Lumb KJ, Sauer RT. Cooperatively folded proteins in random sequence libraries. Nat Struct Biol. 2:1995;856-864.
30. Mirsky AK, Pauling L. On the structure of native, denatured, and coagulated proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 22:1936;439-447.
31. Anfinsen CB. Principles that govern the folding of protein chains. Science. 181:1973;223-230.
32. Miranker AD, Dobson CM. Collapse and cooperativity in protein folding. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 6:1996;31-42.
33. Ptitsyn OB. Structures of folding intermediates. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 5:1995;74-78.
34. of special interest Roder H, Colón W. Kinetic role of early intermediates in protein folding. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 7:1997;15-28 An excellent review of collapse and cooperativity in protein folding and the role of collapse as a rate-limiting step in the folding process.
35. of special interest Hinds DA, Levitt M. From structure to sequence and back again. J Mol Biol. 258:1996;201-209 This theoretical study explores some potential structural pitfalls faced by proteins composed of reduced amino acid alphabets.
36. Chan HS, Dill KA. Comparing folding codes for proteins and polymers. Proteins. 24:1996;335-344.
37. of outstanding interest Munson M, Anderson KS, Regan L. Speeding up protein folding: mutations that increase the rate at which Rop folds and unfolds by over four orders of magnitude. Fold Des. 2:1997;77-87 This investigation into the folding rates of core-simplified variants of Rop suggests that the potential packing redundancy of simplified hydrophobic cores does not reduce protein folding rates. Indeed, all of the simplified variants investigated fold more rapidly than the wild-type sequence from which they were derived, potentially due to the removal of buried hydrophilic residues.
38. Waldburger CD, Jonsson T, Sauer RT. Barriers to protein folding: formation of buried polar interactions is a slow step in acquisition of structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 93:1996;2629-2634.
39. Levinthal C. Are there pathways for protein folding? J Chem Phys. 65:1968;44-45.
40. Crick FHC. The origin of the genetic code. J Mol Biol. 38:1968;367-379.
41. Crick FHC, Orgel L. Directed Panspermia. Icarus. 19:1973;341-346.
42. Wong JT. A co-evolution theory of the genetic code. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 72:1975;1909-1912.
43. Kuhn H, Waser J. On the origin of the genetic code. FEBS Lett. 352:1994;259-264.
44. Moller W, Janssen GM. Transfer RNAs for primordial amino acids contain remnants of a primitive code at position 3 to 5. Biochimie. 72:1990;361-368.
45. Abkevich VI, Gutin AM, Shakhnovich EI. How the first biopolymers could have evolved. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 93:1996;839-844.
46. Sicheri F, Yang DS. Ice-binding structure and mechanism of an antifreeze protein from winter flounder. Nature. 375:1995;427-431.
47. of special interest Davies PL, Sykes BD. Antifreeze proteins. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 7:1997;828-834 A comprehensive review of the structures and activities of some of the simplest naturally occurring proteins.
48. of outstanding interest Schafmeister CE, LaPorte SL, Miercke LJW, Stroud RM. A designed four helix bundle protein with native-like structure. Nat Struct Biol. 4:1997;1039-1042 This crystallographic study of a de novo designed, seven-residue type, 108 residue, four-helix bundle clearly demonstrates that only limited compositional and pattern complexity are required to generate truly native proteins.