Optimally recovering rate variation information from genomes and sequences: Pattern filtering

Molecular Biology and Evolution

Volumn 15, Issue 9, 1998, Pages 1224-1231

  Lake, James A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Fourier transform; Genomics; Nucleotide substitution rate variation; Optimal filtering; Phylogenetic reconstruction

Indexed keywords

ELONGATION FACTOR 1ALPHA; MITOCHONDRIAL DNA;

AMINO ACID SUBSTITUTION; ARCHAEBACTERIUM; ARTICLE; EUKARYOTE; FOURIER TRANSFORMATION; LINEAR SYSTEM; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MUTATION RATE; OPEN READING FRAME; PHYLOGENY; PROKARYOTE; STOCHASTIC MODEL; TAXONOMY;

ARCHAEA; EUKARYOTA; PROKARYOTA;

EID: 0031828814     PISSN: 07374038     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026030     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. ADACHI, J., and M. HASEGAWA. 1996. Tempo and mode of synonymous substitutions in mitochondrial DNA of primates. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13:200-208.
2. AGUINALDO, A. A., J. M. TURBEVILLE, L. S. LINFORD, M. C. RIVERA, J. R. GAREY, R. A. RAFF, and J. A. LAKE. 1997. Evidence for a clade of nematodes, arthropods, and other molting animals. Nature 389:489-493.
3. BALDAUF, S., J. PALMER, and W. F. DOOLITTLE. 1996. The root of the universal tree and the origin of eukaryotes based on elongation factor phylogeny. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:7749-7754.
4. BROWN, W. M. 1963. Analysis of linear time-invariant systems. McGraw-Hill, New York.
5. BROWN, W. M., E. M. PRAGER, A. WANG, and A. C. WILSON. 1982. Mitochondrial DNA sequences of primates: tempo and mode of evolution. J. Mol. Evol. 18:225-239.
6. COUSINEAU, B., C. CERPA, J. LEFEBVRE, and R. CEDERGREN. 1992. The sequence of the gene encoding elongation factor Tu from Chlamydia trachomatis compared with those of other organisms. Gene 120:33-41.
7. CRETI, R., F. CITARELL, O. TIBONI, A. SANANGELANTONI, P. PALM, and P. CAMMARANO. 1991. Nucleotide sequence of a DNA region comprising the gene for elongation factor 1α from the ultrathermophilic archaeote Pyrococcus woesei: phylogenetic Implications. J. Mol. Evol. 33:332-342.
8. DAYHOFF, M. O., W. C. BARKER, and L.T. HUNT. 1983. Establishing homologies in protein sequences. Methods Enzymol. 91:524-545.
9. DE ROSIER, D. J., and A. KLUG. 1968. Reconstruction of three dimensional structures from electron micrographs. Nature 271:130-134.
10. ELLIOTT, D. F., and K. R. RAO. 1982. Fourier transforms and their physical applications. Academic Press, New York.
11. FELSENSTEIN, J., and G. A. CHURCHILL. 1996. A hidden Markov model approach to variation among sites in rate of evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13:93-104.
12. HASHIMOTO, T., and M. HASEGAWA. 1996. Origin and early evolution of eukaryotes inferred from the amino acid sequences of translation elongation factors 1α/Tu and 2/G. Adv. Biophys. 32:73-120.
13. LAKE, J. A. 1972. Biological studies. Pp. 153-188 in H. LIPSON, ed. Optical transforms. Academic Press, London, New York.
14. _. 1988. Origin of the eukaryotic nucleus determined by rate-invariant analysis of rRNA sequences. Nature 331:184-186.
15. _. 1991. The order of sequence alignment can bias the selection of tree topology. Mol. Biol. Evol. 8:378-385.
16. _. 1994. Reconstructing evolutionary trees from DNA and protein sequences: paralinear distances. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:1455-1459.
17. LOCKHART, P. J., A. W. LARKUM, M. STEEL, P. J. WADDELL, and D. PENNY. 1996. Evolution of chlorophyll and bacteriochlorophyll: the problem of invariant sites in sequence analysis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:1930-1934.
18. LOCKHART, P. J., M. A. STEEL, M. D. HENDY, and D. PENNY. 1994. Recovering evolutionary trees under a more realistic model of sequence evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 11:605-615.
19. PRESS, W. H., B. P. FLANNERY, S. A. TEUKOLSKY, and W. T. VETTERLING. 1986. Numerical recipes, the art of scientific computing. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.
20. RILEY, M. 1993. Functions of gene products of Escherichia coli. Microbiol. Rev. 57:862-952.
21. RIVERA, M. C., R. JAIN, J. MOORE, and J. A. LAKE. 1998. Genomic evidence for two functionally distinct gene classes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:6239-6244.
22. RZHETSKY, A., and M. NEI. 1994. Unbiased estimates of the number of nucleotide substitutions when substitution rate varies among different sites. J. Mol. Evol. 38:295-299.
23. STEEL, M. A. 1994. Recovering a tree from the leaf colourations it generates under a Markov model. Appl. Math. Lett. 7:19-24.
24. STEWART, C.-B. 1993. The powers and pitfalls of parsimony. Nature 361:603-607.
25. TUFFLEY, C., and M. STEEL. 1998. Modeling the covarion hypothesis of nucleotide substitution. Math. Biosci. 147:63-91.
26. VAN DE PEER, Y., S. NICOLAI, P. DE RIJK, and R. DE WACHTER. 1996. Database on the structure of small ribosomal subunit RNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 24:86-91.
27. WIENER, N. 1948. Cybernetics. The Technology Press, John Wiley and Sons, New York.
28. WOESE, C. R., O. KANDLER, and M. L. WHEELIS. 1990. Towards defining a natural system of organisms: proposal for the domains Archaea, Bacteria, and Eucarya. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87:4576-4579.