Somitogenesis: Segmenting a vertebrate

Current Opinion in Genetics and Development

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 487-493

  McGrew, Michael J ^a   Pourquié, Olivier ^a  

^a AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EMBRYO; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; GENETIC CONSERVATION; MESODERM; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SOMITE; VERTEBRATE;

VERTEBRATA;

EID: 0031715773     PISSN: 0959437X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0959-437X(98)80122-6     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Christ B, Ordahl CP: Early stages of chick somite development. Anat Embryol (Berl) 1995, 191:381-396.
2. Gossler A, Hrabe de Angelis M: Somitogenesis. Curr Top Dev Biol 1998, 38:225-287.
3. Catala M, Teillet MA, Le Douarin NM: Organization and development of the tail bud analyzed with the quail-chick chimaera system. Mech Dev 1995, 51:51-65.
4. Psychoyos D, Stern CD: Fates and migratory routes of primitive streak cells in the chick embryo. Development 1996, 122:1523-1534.
5. Richardson MK, Allen SP, Wright GM, Raynaud A, Hanken J: Somite number and vertebrate evolution. Development 1998, 125:151-160. This review examines the variation of somite number between animal species. The authors propose that the process of somitogenesis shows a 'dissociation' from the 'developmental hourglass' model.
6. Yamaguchi TP, Harpal K, Henkemeyer M, Rossant J: fgfr-1 is required for embryonic growth and mesodermal patterning during mouse gastrulation. Genes Dev 1994, 8:3032-3044.
7. Chapman DL, Papaioannou VE: Three neural tubes in mouse embryos with mutations in the T-box gene Tbx6. Nature 1998, 391:695-697. This study demonstrates that Tbx6 is necessary for the proper specification of the posterior paraxial mesoderm. The targeted mutation of Tbx6 resulted in the apparent conversion of posterior paraxial mesoderm into neural-tube-like structures.
8. •] with the Tbx6 knock-out, Wnt-3a mutant embryos do not correctly form paraxial mesoderm; instead an additional neural tube-like structure is generated medially.
9. Hirsinger E, Duprez D, Jouve C, Malapert P, Cooke J, Pourquié O: Noggin acts downstream of Wnt and Sonic Hedgehog to antagonize BMP4 in avian somite patterning. Development 1997, 124:4605-4614.
10. Marcelle C, Stark MR, Bronner-Fraser M: Coordinate actions of BMPs, Wnts, Shh and noggin mediate patterning of the dorsal somite. Development 1997, 124:3955-3963.
11. Dietrich S, Schubert FR, Lumsden A: Control of dorsoventral pattern in the chick paraxial mesoderm. Development 1997, 124:3895-3908.
12. Borycki AG, Mendham L, Emerson C: Control of somite patterning by sonic hedgehog and its downstream signal response genes. Development 1998, 125:777-790.
13. Tajbakhsh S, Cossu G: Establishing myogenic identity during somitogenesis. Curr Opin Genet Dev 1997, 7:634-641.
14. Tajbakhsh S, Spörle R: Somite development: constructing the vertebrate body. Cell 1998, 92:9-16.
15. Christ B, Schmidt C, Huang R, Wilting J, Brand-Saberi B: Segmentation of the vertebrate body. Anat Embryol (Berl) 1998, 197:1-8.
16. Sander K: Specification of the basic body in insect embryogenesis. Adv Insect Physiol 1976, 12:125-238.
17. Kornberg TB, Tabata T: Segmentation of the Drosophila embryo. Curr Opin Genet Dev 1993, 3:585-594.
18. DeRobertis EM, Sasai Y: A common plan for dorsoventral patterning in Bilateria. Nature 1996, 380:37-40.
19. Muller M, von Weizsacker E, Campos-Ortega JA: Expression domains of a zebrafish homologue of the Drosophila pair-rule gene hairy correspond to primordia of alternating somites. Development 1996, 122:2071-2078.
20. Palmeirim I, Henrique D, Ish-Horowicz D, Pourquie O: Avian hairy gene expression identifies a molecular clock linked to vertebrate segmentation and somitogenesis. Cell 1997, 91:639-648. A report of the identification of an avian hairy homolog which is expressed in a dynamic and cyclic fashion in the presomitic mesoderm. It is proposed that the oscillations of the c-hairy1 mRNA in the PSM identify a molecular clock linked to somitogenesis. The purpose of such a clock would be to translate a periodic temporal pattern into the spatial periodicity of somites. This gene is, however, not expressed in a pair-rule fashion in the PSM.
21. Holland LZ, Kene M, Williams NA, Holland ND: Sequence and embryonic expression of the Amphioxus engrailed gene (AmphiEn): the metameric pattern of transcription resembles that of its segment-polarity homolog in Drosophila. Development 1997, 124:1723-1732. An Amphioxus homolog of the engrailed gene and its expression pattern is described. Surprisingly, this gene is expressed in the caudal part of the head somites which is similar to the arthropod system in which engrailed is expressed in the caudal part of segments. This observation reinforces the idea of a potential conservation between the segmentation mechanisms used by protostomes and deuterostomes.
22. Akam M: Insect development. Is pairing the rule? Nature 1994, 367:410-411.
23. Patel NH: The evolution of arthropod segmentation: insights from comparisons of gene expression patterns. Development 1994, Suppl.:201-207.
24. Patel NH, Condron BG, Zinn K: Pair-rule expression patterns of even-skipped are found in both short- and long-germ beetles. Nature 1994, 367:429-434.
25. Dawes R, Dawson I, Falciani F, Tear G, Akam M: Dax, a locust Hox gene related to fushi-tarazu but showing no pair-rule expression. Development 1994, 120:1561-1572.
26. Kimmel CB: Was Urbilateria segmented? Trends Genet 1996, 12:329-331.
27. De Robertis EM: Evolutionary biology. The ancestry of segmentation. Nature 1997, 387:25-26.
28. Patel NH, Martín-Blanco E, Coleman KG, Poole SJ, Ellis MC, Kornberg TB, Goodman CS: Expression of engrailed proteins in arthropods, annelids, and chordates. Cell 1989, 58:955-968.
29. Schilling TF, Kimmel CB: Musculoskeletal patterning in the pharyngeal segments of the zebrafish embryo. Development 1997, 124:2945-2960.
30. Fjose A, Njolstad PR, Nornes S, Molven A, Krauss S: Structure and early embryonic expression of the zebrafish engrailed -2 gene. Mech Dev 1992, 39:51-62.
31. Davis CA, Holmyard DP, Millen KJ, Joyner AL: Examining pattern formation in mouse, chicken and frog embryos with an En-specific antiserum. Development 1991, 111:287-298.
32. Gardner CA, Barald KF: Expression patterns of engrailed -like proteins in the chick embryo. Dev Dyn 1992, 193:370-388.
33. Palmeirim I, Dubrulle J, Henrique D, Ish-Horowicz D, Pourquié O: Uncoupling segmentation and somitogenesis in the chick presomitic mesoderm. Dev Genet 1998, 23:77-85. The authors show that expiants of avian presomitic mesoderm devoid of surrounding structures can exhibit a segmental pattern of c-Delta-1 and c-Notch-1 expression in absence of somite epithelialization. In addition, it is shown that ectoderm can restore somite formation in these explants.
34. Sosic D, Brand-Saberi B, Schmidt C, Christ B, Olson EN: Regulation of paraxis expression and somite formation by ectoderm- and neural tube-derived signals. Dev Biol 1997, 185:229-243. This report uses surgical manipulations such as in vivo ectoderm ablation in the chick embryo to demonstrate the role of ectodermal signals in promoting paraxis expression and somite epithelialization.
35. Keynes RJ, Stern CD: Mechanisms of vertebrate segmentation. Development 1988, 103:413-429.
36. Cooke J, Zeeman EC: A clock and wavefront model for control of the number of repeated structures during animal morphogenesis. J Theor Biol 1976, 58:455-476.
37. Meinhardt H: Models of segmentation. In Somites in Developing Embryos. Edited by Bellairs R, Ede DA, Lash JW. New York and London: Plenum Press; 1986:179-191.
38. Stern CD, Fraser SE, Keynes RJ, Primmett DR: A cell lineage analysis of segmentation in the chick embryo. Development 1988, 104:231-244.
39. Cooke J: A gene that resuscitates a theory-somitogenesis and a molecular oscillator. Trends Genet 1998, 14:85-88.
40. Packard DSJ: The influence of axial structures on chick somite formation. Dev Biol 1976, 53:36-48.
41. Swiatek RJ, Lindsell CE, del Amo FF, Weinmaster G, Gridley T: Notch1 is essential for postimplantation development in mice. Genes Dev 1994, 8:707-719.
42. Conlon RA, Reaume AG, Rossant J: Notch1 is required for the coordinate segmentation of somites. Development 1995, 121:1533-1545.
43. Hrabé de Angelis M, McIntyre J, Gossler A: Maintenance of somite borders in mice requires the Delta homologue DII1. Nature 1997, 386:717-721. This paper shows the major role played by Delta 1 in somite patterning. The targeted mutation of this Notch ligand results in the loss of somite polarity whereas the derivatives of the somites form normally. A possible consequence of the loss of segment polarity is the disruption of somite borders.
44. Oka C, Nakano T, Wakeham A, de la Pompa JL, Mori C, Sakai T, Okazaki S, Kawaichi M, Shiota K, Mak TW, Honjo T: Disruption of the mouse RBP-J kappa gene results in early embryonic death. Development 1995, 121:3291-3301.
45. Wong PC, Zheng H, Chen H, Becher MW, Sirinathsinghji DJ, Trumbauer ME, Chen HY, Price DL, Van der Ploeg LH, Sisodia SS: Presenilin 1 is required for Notch1 and DII1 expression in the paraxial mesoderm. Nature 1997, 387:288-292. The authors report that the major defect caused by the targeted mutation of presenilin 1, a modulatior of the Notch signaling pathway, is a disruption of somitogenesis. The accompanying reduction of Delta1 and Notch1 in the PSM is suggestive of a role in the regulation of these factors.
46. Jen WC, Wettstein D, Chitnis D, Kintner C: The Notch ligand, X-Delta-2, mediates segmentation of the paraxial mesoderm in Xenopus embryos. Development 1997, 124(Suppl.):1169-1178. This study is the first to describe the expression of the Xenopus delta homolog, X-Delta-2, as a series of stripes in the PSM. The authors show that the overexpression of a dominant negative form of either X-Delta-2 or suppressor of hairless, XSu(H), disrupts segment formation. These results suggest that, in Xenopus, the Notch-Delta pathway plays a role in segment formation.
47. Kimble J, Simpson P: The LIN-12/Notch signaling pathway and its regulation. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 1997, 13:333-361.
48. Blair SS: Limb Development: marginal fringe benefits. Curr Biol 1997, 7:686-690.
49. Saga Y, Hata N, Koseki H, Taketo MM: Mesp2: a novel mouse gene expressed in the presegmented mesoderm and essential for segmentation initiation. Genes Dev 1997, 11:1827-1839. These authors demonstrate that the b-HLH factor, Mesp2, is required for somitogenesis. The targeted knock-out of this gene disrupts somite formation and segment plolarity. Evidence is presented which suggests that Mesp2 may lie upstream of the Notch-Delta and FGFR1 signaling pathways in the PSM.
50. Burgess R, Rawls A, Brown D, Bradley A, Olson EN: Requirement of the paraxis gene for somite formation and musculoskeletal patterning. Nature 1996, 384:570-573.