Breast cancer: Prediction with artificial neural network based on BI-RADS standardized lexicon

Radiology

Volumn 196, Issue 3, 1995, Pages 817-822

  Baker, Jay A ^a   Kornguth, Phyllis J ^a   Lo, Joseph Y ^a   Williford, Margaret E ^a   Floyd Jr , Carey E ^a  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast neoplasms, diagnosis; Computers, diagnostic aid; Computers, neural network; Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC)

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER CLASSIFICATION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MAMMOGRAPHY; NERVE CELL NETWORK; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STANDARDIZATION;

EID: 0029095797     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiology.196.3.7644649     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Garfinkel L, Boring CC, Heath CW. Changing trends: an overview of breast cancer incidence and mortality. Cancer 1994; 74:222-227.
2. Feuer EJ, Wun LM, Boring CC, Flanders WD, Timmel MJ, Tong T. The lifetime risk of developing breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 1993; 85:892-897.
3. Newcomb PA, Lantz PM. Recent trends in breast cancer incidence, mortality and mammography. Breast Cancer Res Treat 1993; 28: 97-106.
4. Shapiro S. Screening: assessment of current studies. Cancer 1994; 74:231-238.
5. Tabár L, Fagerberg CJG, Gad A, et al. Reduction in mortality from breast cancer after mass screening with mammography: randomised trial from the Breast Cancer Screening Working Group of the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare. Lancet 1985; 1:829-832.
6. Rutqvist LE, Miller AB, Andersson I, et al. Reduced breast cancer mortality with mammography screening: an assessment of currently available data. IV. Int J Cancer 1990; 5(suppl): 76-84.
7. Verbeek ALM, Hendriks JHCL, Holland R, et al. Reduction of breast cancer mortality through mass screening with modern mammography. Lancet 1984; 1:1222-1224.
8. Adler DD, Helvie MA. Mammographic biopsy recommendations. Curr Opin Radiol 1992; 4:123-129.
9. Kopans DB. The positive predictive value of mammography. AJR 1992; 158:521-526.
10. Ciatto S, Cataliotti L, Distante V. Nonpalpable lesions detected with mammography: review of 512 consecutive cases. Radiology 1987; 165:99-102.
11. Hall FM. Screening mammography: potential problems on the horizon. New Engl J Med 1986; 314:53-55.
12. Hall FM, Storella JM, Silverstone DZ, Wyshak G. Nonpalpable breast lesions: recommendations for biopsy based on suspicion of carcinoma at mammography. Radiology 1988; 167: 353-358.
13. Knutzen AM, Gisvold JJ. Likelihood of malignant disease for various categories of mammographically detected, nonpalpable breast lesions. Mayo Clin Proc 1993; 68:454-460.
14. Meyer JE, Kopans DB, Stomper PC, Lindfors KK. Occult breast abnormalities: percutaneous preoperative needle localization. Radiology 1984; 150:335-337.
15. Schwartz GF, Carter DL, Conant EF, Gannon FH, Finkel GC, Feig SA. Mammographically detected breast cancer: nonpalpable is not a synonym for inconsequential. Cancer 1994; 73:1660-1665.
16. Franceschi D, Crowe JP, Lie S, et al. Not all nonpalpable breast cancers are alike. Arch Surg 1991; 126:967-971.
17. Thompson WR, Bowen R, Dorman BA, Pricolo VE, Shahinian TK, Soderberg CH. Mammographic localization and biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions: a 5-year study. Arch Surg 1991; 126:730-734.
18. Bassett LW, Liu TH, Giuliano AE, Gold RH. The prevalence of carcinoma in palpable vs impalpable, mammographically detected lesions. AJR 1991; 157:21-24.
19. Helvie MA, Ikeda DM, Adler DD. Localization and needle aspiration of breast lesions: complications in 370 cases. AJR 1991; 157:711-714.
20. Dixon JM, John TG. Morbidity after breast biopsy for benign disease in a screened population. Lancet 1992; 1:128.
21. Wasserman PD. Neural computing: theory and practice. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1990.
22. Boone JM, Gross GW, Greco-Hunt V. Neural networks in radiologic diagnosis. I. Introduction and illustration. Invest Radiol 1990; 25: 1012-1016.
23. Wu Y, Giger ML, Doi K, Vyborny CJ, Schmidt RA, Metz CE. Artificial neural networks in mammography: application to decision making in the diagnosis of breast cancer. Radiology 1993; 187:81-87.
24. Erb RJ. Introduction to backpropagation neural network computation. Pharm Res 1993; 10:165-170.
25. Floyd CE Jr, Lo JY, Yun AJ, Sullivan DC, Kornguth PJ. Prediction of breast cancer malignancy using an artificial neural network. Cancer 1994; 74:2944-2948.
26. Giger ML, Vyborny CJ, Schmidt RA. Computerized characterization of mammographic masses: analysis of spiculation. Cancer Lett 1994; 77:201-211.
27. D'Orsi CJ, Getty DJ, Swets JA, Pickett RM, Seltzer SE, McNeil BJ. Reading and decision aids for improved accuracy and standardization of mammographic diagnosis. Radiology 1992; 184:619-622.
28. Kopans DB. Standardized mammography reporting. Radiol Clin North Am 1992; 30:257-264.
29. D'Orsi CJ, Kopans DB. Mammographic feature analysis. Semin Roentgenol 1993; 28:204-230.
30. Breast imaging - reporting and data system (BI-RADS) Reston, Va: American College of Radiology, 1993.
31. D'Orsi CJ, Kopans DB. The American College of Radiology's mammography lexicon: barking up the only tree. AJR 1994; 162:595.
32. McKenna RJ. The abnormal mammogram radiographic findings, diagnostic options, pathology, and stage of cancer diagnosis. Cancer 1994; 74:244-255.
33. Heilbrunn KS. The American College of Radiology's mammography lexicon: barking up the wrong tree? AJR 1994; 162:593-594.
34. Metz CE. Some practical issues of experimental design and data analysis in radiological ROC studies. Invest Radiol 1989; 24:234-245.
35. Tabár L, Gad A. Screening for breast cancer: the Swedish Trial. Radiology 1981; 138:219-222.
36. Kopans DB, Swann CA. Observations on mammographic screening and false-positive mammograms. AJR 1988; 150:785-786.
37. Scott JA, Palmer EL. Neural network analysis of ventilation-perfusion lung scans. Radiology 1993; 186:661-664.
38. Tourassi GD, Floyd CE Jr, Sostman HD, Coleman RE. Acute pulmonary embolism: artificial neural network approach for diagnosis. Radiology 1993; 189:555-558.
39. Asada N, Doi K, MacMahon H, et al. Potential usefulness of an artificial neural network for differential diagnosis of interstitial lung diseases: pilot study. Radiology 1990; 177:857-860.
40. Lo SB, Freedman MT, Lin JS, Mun SK. Automatic lung nodule detection using profile matching and back-propagation neural network techniques. J Digital Imaging 1993; 6:48-54.
41. Gross GW, Boone JM, Greco-Hunt V, Greenberg B. Neural networks in radiologic diagnosis. II. Interpretation of neonatal chest radiographs. Invest Radiol 1990; 25:1017-1023.
42. Piraino DW, Amartur SC, Richmond BJ, et al. Application of an artificial neural network in radiographic diagnosis. J Digit Imaging 1991; 4:226-232.
43. Elmore JG, Wells CK, Lee CH, Howard DH, Feinstein AR. Variability in radiologists' interpretations of mammograms. New Engl J Med 1994; 331:1493-1499.