Philosophy of science and physiology education

American Journal of Physiology

Volumn 272, Issue 6 PART 3, 1997, Pages

  Refinetti, Roberto ^a  

^a The College of William and Mary   (United States)

Author keywords

Constructivism: Science education; Philosophical relativity; Postmodernism

Indexed keywords

EDUCATION; PHILOSOPHY; PHYSIOLOGY; REVIEW; SCIENCE;

PHILOSOPHY; PHYSIOLOGY; SCIENCE;

EID: 0031159498     PISSN: 00029513     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/advances.1997.272.6.s31     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Ayer, A. J. (Editor). Logical Positivism. Chicago: Free Press of Glencoe, 1959.
2. Bleier, R. Science und Gender: A Critique of Biology and Its Theories on Women. New York: Pergamon, 1984.
3. Bloor, D. Knowledge and Social Imagery. London: Rontledge & Kegan Paul, 1976.
4. Cahn, S. M. Two concepts of affirmative action. Academe 83: 14-19, 1997.
5. Comte, A. Cours de Philosophie Positive. Paris: J. B. Baillière, 1877.
6. Einstein, A. The Meaning of Relativity. London: Methuen, 1922.
7. Foucault, M. L'Archéologie du Savoir. Paris: Gallimard, 1969.
8. Fuller, S. Philosophy of Science and Its Discontents (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford, 1993.
9. Gomperz, T. Les Penseurs de la Grèce (3rd ed.). Paris: Pavot, 1928, vol. 1.
10. Grinnell, F. The Scientific Attitude. Boulder, CO: Westview, 1987.
11. Gross, P. R., and N. Levitt. Higher Superstition: The Academic Left and Its Quarrels with Science. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1994.
12. Hamermesh, D. S. Not so bad. Academe 82: 14-39, 1996.
13. Hodgkin, P. Medicine, postmodernism, and the end of certainty. BMJ 313: 1568, 1996 [http://www.bmj.com/bmj/archive/7072e4.htm].
14. Hull, D. L. Philosophy of Biological Science. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1974.
15. Husserl, E. Die Philosophie als strenge Wissenschaft. Logos 1: 289-341, 1911.
16. Klotz, I. M. Postmodernist rhetoric does not change fundamental scientific facts. Scientist 10: 9, 1996.
17. Kuhn, T. S. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962.
18. Levitt, N., and P. R. Gross. Academic anti-science. Academe 82: 38-42, 1996.
19. Lightman, A., and O. Gingerich. When do anomalies begin? Science 255: 690-695, 1992.
20. Longino, H. E. Science as Social Knowledge. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1990.
21. Mahner, M., and M. Bunge. Is religious education compatible with science education? Sci. Educ. 5: 101-123, 1996.
22. Medawar, P. B. Advice to a Young Scientist. New York: Basic Books, 1979.
23. Peters, M. Techno-science, rationality, and the universe: Lyotard on the "postmodern condition." Educ. Theory 39: 93-105, 1989.
24. Peters, M. Education and the postmodern condition: revisiting Jean-François Lyotard. J. Philos. Educ. 29: 387-400, 1995.
25. Pinnick, C. L. Feminist epistemology: implications for philosophy of science. Philos. Sci. 61: 646-657, 1994.
26. Schram, F. R. The Myth of Science. New York: Vantage, 1979.
27. Smeyers, P. Education and the educational project. I. The atmosphere of post-modernism. J. Philos. Educ. 29: 109-119, 1995.
28. Smith, M. B. Selfhood at risk: postmodern perils and the perils of postmodernism. Am. Psychol. 49: 405-411, 1994.
29. Standish, P. Postmodernism and the education of the whole person. J. Philos. Educ. 29: 121-135, 1995.
30. Unger, P. Philosophical Relativity. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1984.