The role of the university in preparing teachers for a linguistically diverse society

Handbook of Undergraduate Second Language Education

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 279-299

  Crandall, Joann Jodi ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE COUNTY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0010765472     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410605016-24     Document Type: Chapter

References (79)

1. Anstrom, K. (1998). Preparing secondary education teachers to work with English language learners: Science. Washington, DC: Center for the Study of Language and Education.
2. August, D., & Pease-Alvarez, L. (1996). Attributes of effective programs and classrooms serving English language learners. Santa Cruz, CA, & Washington, DC: National Center for Research on Cultural Diversity and Second Language Learning.
3. Bernier, A. (1994). Diversity’s challenge in the classroom: Language and history pedagogy from the student optic. The History Teacher, 28, 37-48.
4. Brinton, D. M., Snow, M. A., & Wesche, M. B. (1989). Content-ítaseii language instruction. New York: Harper &Row.
5. Chamot, A., & O’Malley, M. (1992). A cognitive academic language learning approach: Abridge to the mainstream. In P. A. Richards-Amato & M. A. Snow (Eds.), The multicultural classroom: Readings for content area teachers (pp. 5-15), Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
6. Christian, D. (1994). Two-way bilingual education: Students learning through two languages (Educational Practice Report No. 12). Santa Cruz, CA, & Washington, DC: National Center for Research on Cultural Diversity and Second Language Learning.
7. Cocking, R. R., & Mestre, J. P. (Eds.), (1988). Linguistic and cultural influences on learning mathematics. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
8. Crandall, J. A. (Ed), (1987). ESL through content-area instruction: Mathematics, science, social studies. McHenry, 1L: Center for Applied Linguistics and Delta Systems.
9. Crandall, J. A. (1993a). Content-centered learning in the United States. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 13, 111-126.
10. Crandall, J. A. (1993b). Strategic integration: Preparing language and content teachers for linguistically and culturally diverse classrooms. In J. E. Alatis (Ed.), Strategic interaction and language acquisition: Theory, practice, and research (pp. 255-274). 255-274.
11. Crandall, J. A. (1995). Reinventing (America’s) schools: The role of the applied linguist. In J. E. Alatis et al. (Eds.), Linguistics and the education of language teachers: Ethnolinguistic, psycholinguistic, and sociolinguistic aspects (pp. 412-427). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
12. Crandall, J. A. (1997). Language teaching approaches for school-aged learners in second language contexts. In G. R. Tucker & D. Corson (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education: Vol, 4: Secondlanguage education (pp. 75-84). 75-84.
13. Crandall, J. A. (1998). The expanding role of the elementary ESL teacher. ESL Magazine, i(4), 10-14.
14. Crandall, J. A., Bernache, C, & Prager, S. (1998). New frontiers in educational policy and program development: The challenge of the underschooled immigrant secondary school student. Educational Policy, 12(6), 719-734.
15. Crandall, J. A., & Greenblatt, L. (1999). Teaching beyond the middle: Meeting the needs of underschooled and high-achieving immigrant students. In M. R. Basterra (Ed.), Excellence and equity in education for language minority students: Critical issues and promising practices (pp. 43-80). Washington, DC: American University, Mid-Atlantic Equity Center.
16. Crandall, J. A., & Tucker, G. R. (1990). Content-based instruction in second and foreign languages. In S. Ani-van (Ed.), Language teaching methodology in the nineties (pp. 83-96). Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Centre. [ERIC Document Reproduction Service ED 312 895]
17. Cuevas, G.J. (1984). Mathematics learning in English as a second language. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 15, 134-144.
18. Cummins, J. (1981). The role of primary language development in promoting educational success for language minority students. In Office of Bilingual Education, California Department of Education (Ed.), Schooling and language minority students: A theoretical framework (pp. 3-49). Los Angeles: California State University, Evaluation and Dissemination Center.
19. Curtain, H. A., & Pesola, C. A. (1994). Foreign languages and children: Making the match. New York: Longman.
20. Darling-Hammond, L. (1996). The quiet revolution: Rethinking teacher development. Educational Leadership, 53(6), 4-10.
21. Davison, C. (1992). Look out: Eight fatal flaws in support and team teaching. TESOL in Context, 2, 39-41.
22. Diaz-Rico, L. T., & Smith, J. (1994). Recruiting and retaining bilingual teachers: A cooperative school-community-university model. The Journal of Education for Language Minority Students, 14, 255-268.
23. Echevarria, J. (1995). Sheltered instruction for students with learning disabilities who have limited English proficiency, intervention in School and Clinic, 30(5), 302-305.
24. Echevarria, J. & Graves, A. (1998). Sheltered content instruction: Teaching English-language learners with diverse abilities. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
25. Enright, D. S., & McCloskey M. L. (1988). integrating English. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
26. Fathman, A. K., Quinn, M. E., & Kessler, C. (1992). Teaching science to English learners, grades 4-8. Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse for Bilingual Education
27. Federal Interagency Forum on Child and Family Statistics. (1998). America’s children: Key national indicators of well-being. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
28. Fitzgerald, N. B. (1995). ESL instruction in adult education: Findings from a national evaluation. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics, National Clearinghouse for ESL Literacy Education.
29. Fix, M., & Zimmerman, W. (1993). Educating immigrant children: Chapter I in the changing city. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
30. Garcia, E. (1994). Understanding and meeting the challenge of student diversity. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
31. Gardner, H. (1993). Multiple intelligences: The theory in practice. New York: Basic Books.
32. Genesee, F. (1987). Learning through two languages: Studies of immersion and bilingual education. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
33. Gonzalez, J. M., & Darling-Hammond, L. (1997). New concepts for new challenges: Professional development for teachers of immigrant youth. Washington, DC, & McHenry, IL: Center for Applied Linguistics and Delta Systems.
34. Hamayan, E. (1994). Language development of low-literacy students. In F. Genesee (Ed.), Educating second language children: The whole child, the whole curriculum, the whole community (pp. 278-300). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
35. Han, M., & Baker, D. (1997). A profile of policies and practices for limited English proficient students: Screening methods, program support, and teacher training: SASS 1993-1994 (NCES 97-472). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics
36. Harper, C. & Piatt, E, (1998). Full inclusion for secondary school ESOL students: Some concerns from Florida. TBSOLJournal, 7(5), 30-36.
37. Harris, J. (1995). Sheltered instruction. The Science Teacher, 62(2), 24-27.
38. Heath, S. B. (1983). Ways with words: Language, life and work in communities and classrooms. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
39. Heath, S. B., & Mangiola, L. (1991). Children of promise: Literate activity in linguistically and culturally diverse classrooms. Washington, DC: National Education Association/American Educational Research Association.
40. Henke, R. R., Choy, S. P., Cehn, X., Geis, S., Alt, M. N., & Broughman, S. P. (1997). America’s teachers: Profile of a profession, 1993-1994. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
41. Jurasek, R. (1988). Integrating foreign languages into the college curriculum. Modern Language Journal, 72, 52-58.
42. Kamhi-Stein, L. D. (1997). Enhancing student performance through discipline-based summarization-strategy instruction. In M. A. Snow & D. M. Brinton (Eds.), The content-based classroom: Perspectives on integrating language and content (pp. 248-262). New York: Longman.
43. Kaufman, D. (1996). Constructivist-based experiential learning in teacher education. Action in Teacher Education, 1,(2), 40-50.
44. Kaufman, D. (1997). Collaborative approaches in preparing teachers for content-based and language enhanced settings. In M. A. Snow & D. M. Brinton (Eds.), The content-based classroom: Perspectives on integrating language and content (pp. 175-186). White Plains, NY: Longman.
45. Kaufman, D. (in press). Developing professionals: Interwoven visions and partnerships. In K. Johnson (Ed.), Case studies in TESOL teacher education. Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
46. Kaufman, D., & Grennon Brooks, J. (1996). Interdisciplinary collaboration in teacher education: A construc-tivist approach. TESOL Quarterly 30(2), 231-251.
47. Krashen, S. (1993). Sheltered subject-matter teaching. In J. W. Oiler (Ed.), Methods that work (2nd ed., pp. 143-154). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
48. Krilowicz, B. L., Henter, H.J.,& Kamhi-Stein, L. D. (1997). A quarter long exercise that introduces general education students to neurophysiology and scientific writing. Advances in Physiology Education, 17(1), 19-25.
49. Krueger, M., & Ryan, F. (Eds.), (1993). Language and content: Discipline-and content-based approaches to language study. Lexington, MA: Heath.
50. League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC) et al. v. Florida Department of Education (U.S. District Court, 1990).
51. Leaver, B. L., & Stryker, S. B. (1989). Content-based instruction in foreign language classrooms. Foreign Language Annals, 22, 269-275.
52. Lindholm, K. J. (1990). Bilingual immersion education: Criteria for program development. In A. M. Padilla, H. H. Fairchild, & C. M. Valadez (Eds.), Bilingual education: Issues and strategies (pp. 91-105). 91-105.
53. Mace-Matluck, B., Alexander-Kasparik, R., & Queen, R. M. (1998). Through the golden door: Educational approaches for immigrant adolescents with limited schooling. McHenry, IL: Center for Applied Linguistics & Delta Systems.
54. McNab, C. (1996). A close look at a sheltered secondary science class in a suburban county school. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Maryland, Baltimore County.
55. Met, M. (1987). Twenty questions: The most commonly asked questions about starting an immersion program. Foreign Language Annals, 20, 311-315.
56. Met, M. (1992). Second language learning in magnet school contexts. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 13, 71-85.
57. Mohan, B, A. (1986). Language and content. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
58. Moll, L., Amanti, C, Neff, D., & Gonzalez, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory into Practice, 31(2), 132-141.
59. Northcutt, L., & Watson, D. (1986). S.E.T.: Sheltered English teachinghandbook. Carlsbad, CA: Northcutt, Watson, Gonzales.
60. Office of Vocational and Adult Education/Division of Adult Education and Literacy. (1999). Thursday Notes (March 11). Washington, DC: Author.
61. Olsen, R. E. W B. (1997). Enrollment, identification, and placement of LEP students increase (again). TESOL Matters, 7(4), 17.
62. O’Malley J. M., & Pierce, L. V (1996). Authentic assessment for English language learners: Practical approaches for teachers. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
63. Peyton, J. K, & Adger, C. (1999). Enhancing the education of immigrant students in secondary school: Structural challenges and solutions. In C. J. Faltis & P. Wolfe (Eds.), So much to say: Adolescents, bilingual ism, and ESL in the secondary school (pp. 205-224). New York: Teachers College Press.
64. Ramirez, J., Yuen, S., & Ramey, D. (1991). Longitudinal study of structured English immersion strategy, early-exit, and late-exit bilingual education programs for language-minority children. San Mateo, CA: Aguirre International.
65. Rosen, N., & Sasser, L. (1997). Sheltered English: Modifying content delivery for second language learners. In M. A. Snow & D. M. Bnnton (Eds.), The content-based classroom (pp. 350-45). White Plains, NY: Addison Wesley Longman.
66. Rosenthal, J. W. (1996). Teaching science to language minority students. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
67. Secada, W. (1992). Evaluating mathematics education of LEP students in a time of educational change. In C. Simich-Dudgeon (Ed.), Proceedings of the Second National Research Symposium on Limited English Proficient Student Issues: Focus on evaluation and measurement (Vol. 2, pp. 209-256). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Bilingual and Minority Languages Affairs.
68. Short, D, (1993). Assessing integrated language and content instruction. TESOL Quarterly, 27(4), 627-656.
69. Short, D. (1994). Expanding middle school horizons: Integrating language, culture, and social studies. TESOL Quarterly, 28(3), 581-608.
70. Snow, M.A. (1997). Teaching academic literacy skills: Discipline faculty take responsibility. In M.A. Snow & D. M. Brinton (Eds.), The content-based classroom: Perspectives on integrating language and content (pp. 290-304). White Plains, NY: Longman.
71. Snow, M. A., & Brinton, D. M. (1988). Content-based language instruction: Investigating the effectiveness of the adjunct model. TESOL Quarterly, 22(3), 553-574.
72. Snow, M. A., & Brinton, D. M. (Eds.). (1997). The content-based classroom: Perspectives on integrating language and content. White Plains, NY: Longman.
73. Snow, M. A., & Kamhi-Stein, L. D. (1997). Teaching academic literacy skills: A new twist on the adjunct model, journal of Intensive English Studies, 11, 93-108.
74. Spanos, G. A. (1989). On the integration of language and content instruction. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 10, 227-240.
75. Strole, C. (1994). Pedagogical responses to student diversity: History and language. The History Teacher, 28, 49-55.
76. Stryker, S. B., & Leaver, B. L. (Eds.), (1997). Content-based instruction in foreign language education: Models and methods. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
77. Tang, G. (1992). The effect of graphic representation of knowledge structures on ESL reading comprehension. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 14, 177-195.
78. Wallace, M.J. (1991). Training foreign language teachers: A reflective approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.
79. Warren, B., & Roseberry, A. S. (1992). Science education as a sense-making practice: Implications for assessment. In C. Simich-Dudgeon (Ed.), Proceedings of the Second National Research Symposium on Limited English Proficient Student Issues: Focus on evaluation and measurement (Vol. 2, pp. 273-304). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Bilingual and Minority Languages Affairs.