Electric Field Effects in Multicomponent Fluid Lipid Membranes

Journal of Physical Chemistry B

Volumn 104, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 119-124

  Groves, Jay T ^a,b   Boxer, Steven G ^a   McConnell, Harden M ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0008678659     PISSN: 15206106     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jp992340g     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Groves, J. T.; Boxer, S. G. Biophys. J. 1995, 69, 1972-1975.
2. Groves, J. T.; Wülfing, C.; Boxer, S. G. Bioplm. J. 1996, 71, 2716-2723.
3. Stelzle, M.; Miehlich, R.; Sackmann, E. Biophys. J. 1992, 63, 1346-1354.
4. Groves, J. T.; Boxer, S. G.; McConnell, H. M. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1997, 94, 13390-13395.
5. Jaffe, L. F. Nature 1977, 265, 600-602.
6. Ryan, T. A.; Myers, J.; Holowka, D.: Baird, B.; Webb, W. W. Science 1988, 239, 61-64.
7. Mouritsen, O. G.; Kinnunen, P. J. K. In Biological membranes. A molecular perspective from computation to experiment; Merz, J. K. M., Roux, B., Eds.; Birkhäuser: Boston, 1996; pp 463-502.
8. Simmons, K.; Ikonen, E. Nature 1997, 387, 569-572.
9. Viola, A.; Schroeder, S.; Sakakihara, Y.; Lanzavecchia, A. Science 1999, 283, 680-682.
10. Sheets, E. D.; Holowka, D.; Baird, B. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 1999, 3, 95-99.
11. Grakoui, A.; Bromley, S. K.; Sumen, C.; Davis, M. M.; Shaw, A. S.; Allen, P. M.; Dustin, M. L. Science 1999, 285, 221-227.
12. Kurzchalia, T. V.; Parton, R. G. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol 1999, 11, 424-431.
13. Giancotti, F. G.; Rouslahti, E. Science 1999, 285, 1028-1032.
14. Groves, J. T.; Boxer, S. G.; McConnell, H. M. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1998, 95, 935-938.
15. Brian, A. A.; McConnell, H. M. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1984, 81, 6159-6163.
16. Sackmann, E. Science 1996, 271, 43-48.
17. Salafsky, J.; Groves, J. T.; Boxer, S. G. Biochemistry 1996, 35, 14773-14781.
18. Johnson, S. J.; Bayerl, T. M.; McDermott, D. C; Adam, G. W.; Rennie, A. R.; Thomas, R. K.; Sackmann, E. Biophys. J. 1991, 59, 289-294.
19. Bayerl, T. M.; Bloom, M. Biophys. J. 1990, 58, 357-362.
20. Koenig, B. W.; Krueger, S.; Orts, W. J.; Majkrzak, C. F.; Berk, N. F.; Silverton, J. V.; Gawrisch, K. Langmuir 1996, 12, 1343-1350.
21. Groves, J. T.; Ulman, N.; Boxer, S. G. Science 1997, 275, 651-653.
22. Groves, J. T.; Ulman, N.; Cremer, P. S.; Boxer, S. G. Langmuir 1998, 14, 3347-3350.
23. Cremer, P. S.; Groves, J. T.; Kung, L. A.; Boxer, S. G. Langmuir 1999. 15, 3893-3896.
24. Groves, J. T.; Boxer, S. G.; McConnell, H. M. Biophys. J., submitted.
25. Lee, K. Y. C.; Klingler, J. F.; McConnell, H. M. Science 1994, 263, 655-658.
26. Lee, K. Y. C.; McConnell, H. M. Biophys. J. 1995, 68, 1740-1751.
27. Guggenheim, E. A. Mixtures; Oxford University Press: London, 1952.
28. Hagen, J. P. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1996, 1280, 169-172.
29. McLaughlin, S.; Poo, M.-M. Biophys. J. 1981, 34, 85-93.
30. Peitzsch, R. M.; Eisenberg, M.; Sharp, K. A.; McLaughlin, S. Biophys. J. 1995, 65, 729-738.
31. McLaughlin, S. Curr. Top. Membr. Transp. 1977, 9, 71-144.
32. D > 10 nm for I < 1mM), the distribution of counterions to charges on the proximal leaflet of the membrane and on the substrate will be altered either by dislocating them to the opposite side of the membrane or by concentrating them into the thin water layer when the supported membrane is formed. Concentration of counterions in the thin water layer will effectively negate charges on the proximal leaflet of the membrane or the substrate, whereas dislocation of counterions to the other side of the membrane will allow buried charges to contribute to the total surface charge density as seen from the distal side of the supported membrane.
33. Meijering, J. L. Philips Res. Rep. 1950, 5, 333-356.
34. Meijering, J. L. Philips Res. Rep. 1951, 6, 183-210.
35. Keller, S. L.; Pitcher, W. H.; Heustis, W. H.; McConnell, H. M. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1998, 81, 5019-5022.
36. Gennis, R. B. Biomembranes; Springer-Verlag: New York, 1989.
37. There are no solutions to the slow viscous flow equations for steady translational motion in two dimensions (Stokes paradox). Thus coupling to the external medium is especially significant in two-dimensional fluid systems such as membranes. See: Saffman, P. G.; Delbrück, M. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1975, 72, 3111-3113. Saffman, P. G. J. Fluid Mech. 1976, 73, 593-602.
38. There are no solutions to the slow viscous flow equations for steady translational motion in two dimensions (Stokes paradox). Thus coupling to the external medium is especially significant in two-dimensional fluid systems such as membranes. See: Saffman, P. G.; Delbrück, M. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1975, 72, 3111-3113. Saffman, P. G. J. Fluid Mech. 1976, 73, 593-602.