Lizard home ranges revisited: Effects of sex, body size, diet habitat, and phylogeny

Ecology

Volumn 83, Issue 7, 2002, Pages 1870-1885

  Perry, Gad ^a   Garland Jr , Theodore ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Allometry; Autarchoglossa; Body size; Diet; Energetics; Habitat; Home range; Iguania; Lizards; Methodology; Phylogeny; Sex

Indexed keywords

ALLOMETRY; BODY SIZE; DIET; HOME RANGE; LIZARD; META-ANALYSIS; PHYLOGENY; SEX-RELATED DIFFERENCE;

AMPHIBIA; ANIMALIA; AUTARCHOGLOSSA; IGUANIA; REPTILIA; SQUAMATA; VERTEBRATA;

EID: 0005899203     PISSN: 00129658     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[1870:LHRREO]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (139)

1. Abouheif, E., and D. J. Fairbairn. 1997. A comparative analysis of allometry for sexual size dimorphism: assessing Rensche's rule. American Naturalist 149:540-562.
2. Ackerly, D. D. 1999. Comparative plant ecology and the role of phylogenetic information. Pages 391-413 in M. C. Press, J. D. Scholes, and M. G. Braker, editors. Physiological plant ecology. The 39th Symposium of the British Ecological Society held at the University of York, 7-9 September 1998. Blackwell Science, Oxford, UK.
3. Alberts, A. C. 1993. Relationship of space use to population density in an herbivorous lizard. Herpetologica 49:469-479.
4. Andrews, R. M. 1971. Structural habitat and time budget of a tropical Anolis lizard. Ecology 52:262-271.
5. Andrews, R. M., and F. H. Pough. 1985. Metabolism of squamate reptiles: allometric and ecological relationships. Physiological Zoology 58:214-231.
6. Armstrong, J. T. 1965. Breeding home range in the nighthawk and other birds: its evolutionary and ecological significance. Ecology 46:619-629.
7. Arnold, E. N. 1973. Relationships of the Palearctic lizards assigned to the genera Lacerta, Algyroides, and Psammodromus (Reptilia: Lacertidae). Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History) Zoology 25:292-366.
8. Arnold, E. N. 1989a. Towards a phylogeny and biogeography of the Lacertidae: relationships within an old-world family of lizards derived from morphology. Bulletin of the British Museum of Natural History D 55:209-251.
9. Arnold, E. N. 1989b. Systematic and adaptive radiation of Equatorial African lizards assigned to the genera Adolphus, Bedriagaia, Gastropholis, Holapsis, and Lacerta (Reptilia; Lacertidae). Journal of Natural History 23:525-555.
10. Arnold, E. N. 1997. Interrelationships and evolution of the east Asian grass lizards, Takydromus (Squamata: Lacertidae). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 119:267-296.
11. Bininda-Emonds, O. R. P., and J. L. Gittleman. 2000. Are pinnipeds functionally different from fissiped carnivores? The importance of phylogenetic comparative analyses. Evolution 54:1011-1023.
12. Bininda-Emonds, O. R. P., J. L. Gittleman, and A. Purvis. 1999. Building large trees by combining phylogenetic information: a complete phylogeny of the extant Carnivora. Biological Reviews 74:143-175.
13. Blob, R. W. 2000. Interspecific scaling of the hindlimb skeleton in lizards, crocodilians, felids and canids: does limb bone shape correlate with limb posture? Journal of Zoology, London 250:507-531.
14. Bonine, K. E., and T. Garland, Jr. 1999. Sprint performance of phrynosomatid lizards, measured on a high-speed treadmill, correlates with hindlimb length. Journal of Zoology, London 248:255-265.
15. Bonine, K. E., T. T. Gleeson, and T. Garland, Jr. 2001. Comparative analysis of fiber-type composition in the iliofibularis muscle of phrynosomatid lizards (Sauria). Journal of Morphology 250:265-280.
16. Brashares, J., T Garland, Jr., and P. Arcese. 2000. Phylogenetic analysis of coadaptation in behavior, diet, and body size in the African antelope. Behavioral Ecology 11:452-463.
17. Burrage, B. R. 1974. Population structure in Agama atra and Cordylus cordylus cordylus in the vicinity of De Kelders, Cape Province. Annals of the South African Museum 66:1-23.
18. Burt, W. H. 1943. Territoriality and home range concepts applied to mammals. Journal of Mammalogy 24:346-352.
19. Changchien, L.-L. 1996. A phylogenetic study of sceloporine lizards and their relationships with other iguanid lizards based on DNA/DNA hybridization. Dissertation. University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin USA.
20. Christian, K. A., W. P. Porter, and C. R. Tracy. 1986. Core areas within the home ranges of Galapagos land iguanas, Conolophus pallidus. Journal of Herpetology 20:272-276.
21. Christian, K. A., C. R. Tracy, and W. P. Porter. 1984. Physiological and ecological consequences of sleeping-site selection by the Galapagos land iguana Conolophus pallidus. Ecology 65:752-758.
22. Christian, K. A., and S. Waldschmidt. 1984. The relationship between lizard home range and body size: a reanalysis of the data. Herpetologica 40:68-75.
23. Clinton, W. L., and B. J. Le Boeuf. 1993. Sexual selection's effects on male life history and the pattern of male mortality. Ecology 74:1884-1892.
24. Clobert, J., T. Garland, Jr., and R. Barbault. 1998. The evolution of demographic tactics in lizards: a test of some hypotheses concerning life history evolution. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 11:329-364.
25. Cooper, W. E., Jr. 1995. Foraging mode, prey chemical discrimination, and phylogeny in lizards. Animal Behaviour 50:973-985.
26. Cruz-Neto, A. P., T. Garland, Jr., and A. S. Abe. 2001. Diet, phylogeny, and basal metabolic rate in phyllostomid bats. Zoology 104:49-58.
27. DeNardo, D. F., and B. Sinervo. 1994. Effects of steroid - hormone interactions on activity and home-range size of male lizards. Hormones and Behavior 28:273-287.
28. Drummond, H. 1983. Aquatic foraging in garter snakes: a comparison of specialists and generalists. Behaviour 86:1-30.
29. Dunham, A. E., D. B. Miles, and D. N. Reznick. 1988. Life history patterns in squamate reptiles. Pages 441-522 in C. Gans and R. B. Huey, editors. Biology of the Reptilia. Volume 16. Ecology B. Alan R. Liss, New York, New York, USA.
30. Estes, R., K. de Quiroz, and J. Gauthier. 1988. Phylogenetic relationships within Squamata. Pages 119-281 in R. Estes and G. Pregill, editors. Phylogenetic relationships of the lizard families. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California, USA.
31. Felsenstein, J. 1985. Phylogenies and the comparative method. American Naturalist 125:1-15.
32. Fitch, H. S. 1981. Sexual size differences in reptiles. University of Kansas Museum of Natural History Miscellaneous Publications 70:1-72.
33. Ford, R. G., and J. P. Myers. 1981. An evaluation and comparison of techniques for estimating home range and territory size. Studies in Avian Biology 6:461-465.
34. Frost, D. R. 1992. Phylogenetic analysis and taxonomy of the Tropidurus group of lizards (Iguania: Tropiduridae). American Museum Novitates 3033.
35. Frost, D. R., and R. Etheridge. 1989. A phylogenetic analysis and taxonomy of iguanian lizards (Reptilia: Squamata). University of Kansas, Museum of Natural History Miscellaneous Publications 81:1-65.
36. Fu, J. 1998. Toward the phylogeny of the family Lacertidae: implications from mitochondrial DNA 12S and 16S gene sequences. (Reptilia: Squamata). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 9:118-130.
37. Fu, J. 2000. Toward the phylogeny of the family Lacertidae: why 4708 base pairs of mtDNA sequences cannot draw the picture. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 71:203-217.
38. Fuller, S., P. Baverstock, and D. King. 1998. Biogeographic origins of goannas (Varanidae): a molecular perspective. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 9:294-307.
39. Garland, T., Jr. 1999. Laboratory endurance capacity predicts variation in field locomotor behaviour among lizard species. Animal Behaviour 57:77-83.
40. Garland, T., Jr., and S. C. Adolph. 1994. Why not to do two-species comparative studies: limitations on inferring adaptation. Physiological Zoology 67:797-828.
41. Garland, T., Jr., and P. A. Carter. 1994. Evolutionary physiology. Annual Review of Physiology 56:579-621.
42. Garland, T., Jr., and R. Díaz-Uriarte. 1999. Polytomies and phylogenetically independent contrasts: an examination of the bounded degrees of freedom approach. Systematic Biology 48:547-558.
43. Garland, T., Jr., A. W. Dickerman, C. M. Janis, and J. A. Jones. 1993. Phylogenetic analysis of covariance by computer simulation. Systematic Biology 42:265-292.
44. Garland, T., Jr., P. H. Harvey, and A. R. Ives. 1992. Procedures for the analysis of comparative data using phylogenetically independent contrasts. Systematic Biology 41:18-32.
45. Garland, T., Jr., and A. R. Ives. 2000. Using the past to predict the present: Confidence intervals for regression equations in phylogenetic comparative methods. American Naturalist 155:346-364.
46. Garland, T., Jr., P. E. Midford, and A. R. Ives. 1999. An introduction to phylogenetically based statistical methods, with a new method for confidence intervals on ancestral values. American Zoologist 39:374-388.
47. Gautestad, A. O., and I. Mysterud. 1995. The home range ghost. Oikos 74:195-204.
48. Gompper, M. E., and J. L. Gittleman. 1991. Home range scaling: intraspecific and comparative trends. Oecologia 87:343-348.
49. Grafen, A. 1989. The phylogenetic regression. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 326:119-157.
50. Greene, H. W. 1982. Dietary and phenotypic diversity in lizards: why are some organisms specialized? Pages 107-128 in D. Mossakowski and G. Roth, editors. Environmental adaptation and evolution. Gustav Fischer, Stuttgart, Germany.
51. Greet, A. E. 1970. A subfamilial classification of scincid lizards. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology 139:151-184.
52. Harestad, A. S., and F. L. Bunnell. 1979. Home range and body weight - a reevaluation. Ecology 60:389-402.
53. Harris, D. J., and E. N. Arnold. 1999. Relationships of wall lizards, Podarcis (Reptilia: Lacertidae) based on mitochondrial DNA sequences. Copeia 1999:749-754.
54. Harris, D. J., E. N. Arnold, and R. H. Thomas. 1999a. Relationships of lacertid lizards (Reptilia: Lacertidae) estimated from mitochondrial DNA sequences and morphology. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 265:1939-1948.
55. Harris, D. J., E. A. Sinclair, N. L. Mercader, J. C. Marshall, and K. A. Crandall. 1999b. Squamate relationships based on C-MOS nuclear DNA sequences. Herpetological Journal 9:147-151.
56. Harris, S., W. J. Cresswell, P. G. Forde, W. J. Trewhella, T. Woollard, and S. Wray. 1990. Home-range analysis using radio-tracking data - a review of problems and techniques particularly as applied to the study of mammals. Mammal Review 20:97-123.
57. Harvey, M. B., and R. L. Gutberlet, Jr. 2000. A phylogenetic analysis of the tropidurine lizards (Squamata: Tropiduridae), including new characters of squamation and epidermal mircostructure. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 128:189-233.
58. Harvey, P. H., and M. D. Pagel. 1991. The comparative method in evolutionary biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
59. Hews, D. K. 1993. Food resources affect female distribution and male mating opportunities in the iguanian lizard Uta palmeri. Animal Behaviour 46:279-291.
60. Honda, M., H. Ota, M. Kobayashi, and T. Hikida. 1999a. Phylogenetic relationships of Australian skinks of the Mabuya group (Reptilia: Scincidae) inferred from mitochondrial DNA sequences. Genes and Genetic Systems 74:135-139.
61. Honda, M., H. Ota, M. Kobayashi, J. Nabhitabhata, H.-S. Yong, and T. Hikida. 1999b. Evolution of Asian and African lygosomine skinks of the Mabuya group (Reptilia: Scincidae): a molecular perspective. Zoological Science 16:979-984.
62. Honda, M., H. Ota, M. Kobayashi, J. Nabhitabhata, H.-S. Yong, S. Sengoku, and T. Hikida. 2000a. Phylogenetic relationships of the family Agamidae (Reptilia: Iguania) inferred from mitochondrial DNA sequences. Zoological Science 17:527-537.
63. Honda, M., H. Ota, M. Kobayashi, J. Nabhitabhata, H.-S. Yong, and T. Hikida. 2000b. Phylogenetic relationships, character evolution, and biogeography of the subfamily Lygosominae (Reptilia: Scincidae) inferred from mitochondrial DNA sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 15:452-461.
64. Huey, R. B., C. R. Peterson, S. J. Arnold, and W. P. Porter. 1989. Hot rocks and not-so-hot rocks: retreat-site selection by garter snakes and its thermal consequences. Ecology 70:931-944.
65. Huey, R. B., E. R. Pianka, and T. W. Schoener, editors. 1983. Lizard ecology: studies of a model organism. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
66. Irschick, D. J. 2000. Comparative and behavioral analyses of preferred speed: Anolis lizards as a model system. Physiological and Biochemical Zoology 73:428-437.
67. Iverson, J. B. 1979. Behavior and ecology of the rock iguana Cyclura carinata. Bulletin of the Florida State Museum, Biological Sciences 24:175-358.
68. Jackman, T. R., A. Larson, K. de Quiroz, and J. B. Losos. 1999. Phylogenetic relationships and tempo of early diversification in Anolis lizards. Systematic Biology 48:254-285.
69. Jennrich, R. I., and F. B. Turner. 1969. Measurement of non-circular home range. Journal of Theoretical Biology 22:227-237.
70. Jenssen, T. A., and S. C. Nunez. 1998. Spatial and breeding relationships of the lizard, Anolis carolinensis: evidence of intrasexual selection. Behaviour 135:981-1003.
71. Joger, U. 1991. A molecular phylogeny of agamid lizards. Copeia 1991:616-622.
72. Kelt, D. A., and D. H. Van Vuren. 2001. The ecology and macroecology of mammalian home range area. American Naturalist 157:637-645.
73. Kluge, A. G. 1987. Cladistic relationships in the Gekkonoidea (Squamata, Sauria). Miscellaneous Publications of the Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan, 173.
74. Lazell, J., and G. Perry. 1997. Anolis cristatellus wileyae: frugivory. Herpetological Review 28:150.
75. Losos, J. B. 1990. Ecomorphology, performance capability, and scaling of West Indian Anolis lizards: an evolutionary analysis. Ecological Monographs 60:369-388.
76. Mace, G. M., and P. H. Harvey. 1983. Energetic constraints on home-range size. American Naturalist 121:120-132.
77. Mace, G. M., P. H. Harvey, and T. H. Clutton-Brock. 1983. Vertebrate home-range size and energetic requirements, Pages 32-53 in I. R. Swingland and P. J. Greenwood, editors. The ecology of animal movement. Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK.
78. Macey, J. R., A. Larson, N. B. Ananjeva, and T. J. Papenfuss. 1997. Evolutionary shifts in three major structural features of the mitochondrial genome among iguanian lizards. Journal of Molecular Evolution 44:660-674.
79. Macey, J. R., J. A. Schulte, II, A. Larson, N. B. Ananjeva, Y. Wang, R. Pethiyagoda, N. Rastegar-Pouyani, and T. J. Papenfuss. 2000. Evaluating tras-Tethys migration: an example using acrodont lizard phylogenetics. Systematic Biology 49:233-256.
80. Marler, C. A., G. Walsberg, M. L. White, and M. Moore. 1995. Increased energy expenditure due to increased territorial defense in male lizards after phenotypic manipulation. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 37:225-231.
81. Martins, E. P. 1993. A comparative study of the evolution of Sceloporus push-up displays. American Naturalist 142:994-1018.
82. Martins, E. P. 1994. Phylogenetic perspectives on the evolution of lizard territoriality. Pages 117-144 in L. J. Vitt and E. R. Pianka, editors. Lizard ecology: historical and experimental perspectives. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
83. Martins, E. P., editor. 1996. Phylogenies and the comparative method in animal behavior. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
84. Martins, E. P., A. N. Bissell, and K. K. Morgan. 1998. Population differences in a lizard communicative display: evidence for rapid change in structure and function. Animal Behaviour 56:1113-1119.
85. Martins, E. P., and J. Lamont. 1998. Estimating ancestral states of a communicative display: a comparative study of Cyclura rock iguanas. Animal Behaviour 55:1685-1706.
86. McGuire, J. A. 1996. Phylogenetic systematics of crotaphytid lizards (Reptilia: Iguania: Crotaphytidae). Bulletin of the Carnagie Museum of Natural History 32.
87. McNab, B. K. 1963. Bioenergetics and determinants of home range size. American Naturalist 97:133-140.
88. Miles, D. B., B. Sinervo, and W. A. Frankino. 2000. Reproductive burden, locomotor performance, and the cost of reproduction in free ranging lizards. Evolution 54:1386-1395.
89. Milstead, W. W. 1972. More on lizard home ranges. Herpetological Review 4:83-84.
90. Milton, K., and M. L. May. 1976. Body weight, diet and home range area in primates. Nature 259:459-462.
91. Mysterud, A., F. J. Pérez-Barbería. and I. J. Gordon. 2001. The effects of season, sex and feeding style on home range area versus body mass scaling in temperate ruminants. Oecologia 127:30-39.
92. Nagy, K. A., I. A. Girard, and T. K. Brown. 1999. Energetics of free-ranging mammals, reptiles, and birds. Annual Review of Nutrition 19:247-277.
93. Nunn, C. L., and R. A. Barton. 2000. Allometric slopes and independent contrasts: a comparative test of Kleiber's Law in primate ranging patterns. American Naturalist 156:519-533.
94. Obst, F. J., K. Richter, and U. Jacob. 1988. The completely illustrated atlas of reptiles and amphibians for the terrarium. T.F.H. Publishing, Neptune City, New Jersey, USA.
95. Perry, G. 1989. Size and mass in five Israeli lizards (Reptilia: Lacertidae). Israel Journal of Zoology 36:129-132.
96. Perry, G. 1999. The evolution of search modes: ecological versus phylogenetic perspectives. American Naturalist 153:98-109.
97. Perry, G., and M. Brandeis. 1992. Variation in stomach contents of the gecko Ptyodactylus hasselquistii guttatus in relation to sex, season and locality. Amphibia-Reptilia 13:275-287.
98. Perry, G., and J. Lazell. 1997. Anolis stratulus: nectivory. Herpetological Review 28:150-151.
99. Perry, G., and E. R. Pianka. 1997. Animal foraging: past, present, and future. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 12:360-364.
100. Peters, R. H. 1977. Unpredictable problems with tropho-dynamics. Environmental Biology of Fishes 2:97-102.
101. Pianka, E. R. 1986. Ecology and natural history of desert lizards. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
102. Pough, F. H. 1980. The advantages of ectothermy for tetrapods. American Naturalist 115:92-112.
103. Pough, F. H., R. M. Andrews, J. E. Cadle, M. L. Crump, A. H. Savitzky, and K. D. Wells. 2001. Herpetology. Second edition. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, USA.
104. Powell, R. A. 2000. Animal home ranges and territories and home range estimators. Pages 65-110 in L. Boitani and T. K. Fuller, editors. Research techniques in animal ecology: controversies and consequences. Columbia University Press, New York, New York, USA.
105. Presch, W. 1974. Evolutionary relationships and biogeography of the macroteiid lizards (Family Teiidae, Subfamily Teiinae). Bulletin of the Southern California Academy of Sciences 73:23-32.
106. Purvis, A., and A. J. Webster. 1999. Phylogenetically independent comparisons and primate phylogeny. Pages 44-70 in P. C. Lee, editor. Comparative primate socioecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
107. Rassmann, K. 1997. Evolutionary age of the Galapágos iguanas predates the age of the present Galapágos chain. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 7:158-172.
108. Reeder, T. W., and J. J. Wiens. 1996. Evolution of the lizard family Phrynosomatide as inferred from diverse types of data. Herpetological Monographs 10:43-84.
109. Reiss, M. 1988. Scaling home range size: body size, metabolic needs and ecology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 3:85-86.
110. Robertson, P. A., N. J. Aebischer, R. E. Kenward, I. K. Hanski, and N. P. Williams. 1998. Simulation and jack-knifing assessment of home-range indices based on underlying trajectories. Journal of Applied Ecology 35:928-940.
111. Rogner, M. 1997a. Lizards: husbandry and reproduction in the vivarium. Volume 1. Geckos, flap-footed lizards, agamas, chameleons, and iguanas. Krieger, Malabar, Florida, USA.
112. Rogner, M. 1997b. Lizards. Volume 2. Monitors, skinks; and other lizards including tuataras and crocodilians. Krieger, Malabar, Florida, USA.
113. Rose, B. 1982. Lizard home ranges: methodology and functions. Journal of Herpetology 16:253-269.
114. Schoener, T. W. 1968. Sizes of feeding territories among birds. Ecology 49:123-141.
115. Schoener, T. W. 1971. Theory of feeding strategies. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 2:369-404.
116. Schoener, T. W. 1981. An empirically based estimate of home range. Theoretical Population Biology 20:281-325.
117. Schoener, T. W., and A. Schoener. 1982. Intraspecific variation in home-range size in some Anolis lizards. Ecology 63:809-823.
118. Schulte, J. A., II, J. R. Macey, A. Larson, and T. J. Papenfuss. 1998. Molecular tests of phylogenetic taxonomies: a general procedure and example using four subfamilies of the lizard family iguanidae. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 10:367-376.
119. Sinervo, B., and C. M. Lively. 1996. The rock-paper-scissors game and the evolution of alternative male strategies. Nature 380:240-243.
120. Sokal, R. R., and F. J. Rohlf. 1995. Biometry. Third edition. Freeman, New York, New York, USA.
121. Somma, L. A. 1990. A categorization and bibliographic survey of parental behavior in lepidosaurian reptiles. Smithsonian Herpetological Information Service 81:1-53.
122. SPSS. 1999a. SPSS Base 10.0. SPSS, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
123. SPSS. 1999b. SPSS Base 10.0 applications guide. SPSS, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
124. Stamps, J. A. 1977. Social behavior and spacing patterns in lizards. Pages 265-334 in C. Gans and D. W. Tinkle, editors. Biology of the Reptilia. Volume 7. Academic Press, London, UK.
125. Stamps, J. A. 1983. Sexual selection, sexual dimorphism, and territoriality. Pages 169-204 in R. B. Huey, E. R. Pianka, and T. W. Schoener, editors. Lizard ecology: studies of a model organism. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
126. Stamps, J. A. V. V. Krishnan, and R. M. Andrews. 1994. Analyses of sexual size dimorphism using null growth-based models. Copeia 1994:598-613.
127. Stebbins, R. C. 1985. A Field guide to western amphibians and reptiles. Second edition. Houghton Mifflin, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
128. Stickel, L. F. 1968. Home range and travels. Pages 373-411 in J. A. King, editor. Biology of Peromyscus (Rodentia). Special Publication Number 2. American Society of Mammalogists, Stillwater, Oklahoma, USA.
129. Swihart, R. K., N. A. Slade, and B. J. Bergstrom. 1988. Relating body size to the rate of home range use in mammals. Ecology 69:393-399.
130. Trivers, R. L. 1976. Sexual selection and resource-accruing abilities in Anolis garmani. Evolution 30:253-269.
131. Turner, F. B., R. I. Jennrich, and J. D. Weintraub. 1969. Home range and body size of lizards. Ecology 50:1076-1081.
132. Vanhooydonck, B., and R. Van Damme. 1999. Evolutionary relationships between body shape and habitat use in lacertid lizards. Evolutionary Ecology Research 1:785-805.
133. Vitt, L. J., and E. R. Pianka, editors. 1994. Lizard ecology: historical and experimental perspectives. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
134. Waldschmidt, S. R. 1979. The effect of statistically based models on home range size estimate in Uta stansburiana. American Midland Naturalist 101:236-240.
135. Werner, Y. L. 1971. Some suggestions for the standard expression of measurements. Systematic Zoology 20:249-252.
136. Wiens, J. J., and B. D. Hollinsworth. 2000. War of the iguanas: conflicting molecular and morphological phylogenies and long-branch attraction in iguanid lizards. Systematic Biology 49:143-159.
137. Wiens, J. J., and T. W. Reeder. 1997. Phylogeny of the spiny lizards (Sceloporus) based on molecular and morphological evidence. Herpetological Monographs 11:1-101.
138. Williamson, M., and K. J. Gaston. 1999. A simple transformation for sets of range sizes. Ecography 22:674-680.
139. Wolf, C. M., T. Garland, Jr., and B. Griffith. 1998. Predictors of avian and mammalian translocation success: reanalysis with phylogenetically independent contrasts. Biological Conservation 86:243-255.