In the shadow: The impact of language on structure, power and communication in the multinational

International Business Review

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 421-440

  Marschan Piekkari, Rebecca ^a   Welch, Denice ^b   Welch, Lawrence ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Company language; Corporate control; Inter unit communication; Multinational management; Organizational structure; Power

Indexed keywords

EID: 0003014313     PISSN: 09695931     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0969-5931(99)00015-3     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Adler, N. (1991). International dimensions of organizational behaviour (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: PWS-Kent Publishing Company.
2. Andersson U., Forsgren M. Subsidiary embededdness and control in the multinational corporation. International Business Review. 5:1996;487-508.
3. Asheghian, P., & Ebrahimi, B. (1990). International business: economics, environment and strategies. New York: Harper Collins Publishers.
4. Bartlett, C.A., & Ghoshal, S. (1990). Matrix management: not a structure, a frame of mind. Harvard Business Review, (July-August), 138-147.
5. Borg, M. (1988). International transfers of managers in multinational corporations. Goteborg, Sweden: Graphic Systems Ab.
6. Chandler, A. (1962). Strategy and structure: chapters in the history of the American industrial entreprise. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
7. Chikudate N. Communication network liaisons as cultural interpreters for organizational adaptation in Japan-Europe business environments. Management International Business Review. 35(special issue):1995;27-38.
8. Dowling, P., Schuler, R. & Welch, D. (1994). International dimensions of human resource management (2nd ed.). Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
9. Economist (1996). The ABB of management. 6 January (p. 62).
10. Edström A., Galbraith J. Transfer of managers as a coordination and control strategy in multinational organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly. 22:1977;248-263.
11. Egelhoff, W. (1993). Information processing theory and the multinational corporation. In S. Ghoshal, & E. Westney, Organization theory and the multinational corporation (pp. 182-210). London: The Macmillan Press.
12. Eisenhardt K. Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review. 14:1989;532-550.
13. Ferner A., Edwards P., Sisson K. Coming unstuck? In search of the 'corporate glue' in an international professional service firm. Human Resource Management. 34(Fall):1995;343-361.
14. Fixman C. The foreign language needs of U.S.-based corporations. Annals. 511(September):1990;25-46.
15. Forsgren M. Managing the international multi-centre firm: case studies from Sweden. European Management Journal. 8:1990;261-267.
16. Forsgren M., Pahlberg C. Subsidiary influence and autonomy in international firms. Scandinavian International Business Review. 1:1992;41-51.
17. Ghoshal S., Korine H., Szulanski G. Interunit communication in multinational corporations. Management Science. 40:1994;96-110.
18. Ghoshal, S., & Bartlett, C.A. (1995). Changing the role of top management: beyond structure to processes. Harvard Business Review, (January-February), 86-96.
19. Hays, R., Korth, C.M., & Roudiani, M. (1972). International business: an introduction to the world of the multinational firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice Hall.
20. Hedlund, G., & Rolander, D. (1990). Action in heterarchies: new approaches to managing the MNC. In C.A. Bartlett, Y. Doz, & G. Hedlund, Managing the global firm (pp. 15-46). London: Routledge.
21. Hedlund G. A model of knowledge management and the N-form corporation. Strategic Management Journal. 15:1994;73-90.
22. Johanson J., Vahlne J. The internationalization process of the firm. Journal of International Business Studies. 8(Spring-Summer):1977;23-32.
23. Kalu T. A framework for empirically investigating the power of functional units in organizations. Scandinavian Journal of Management. 11:1995;251-268.
24. Kone Annual Report (1996). Helsinki, Finland.
25. Lindholm, E. (1997). Culturally related problems in steering of foreign subsidiaries: subsidiary operations of Finnish companies in Spain. Master's thesis. Helsinki, Finland: Helsinki School of Economics and Business Administration.
26. Luostarinen, R. (1979). The internationalization process of the firm (3rd ed.). Helsinki, Finland: Helsinki School of Economics Press.
27. Macdonald S., Williams C. The survival of the gatekeeper. Research Policy. 23:1992;123-132.
28. Macdonald S. Informal information flow and strategy in the international firm. International Journal of Technology Management. 11(special issue):1996;219-232.
29. Maljers, F. (1992). Inside Unilever: the evolving transnational corporation. Harvard Business Review, (September-October), 46-51.
30. Marschan, R. (1996). New structural forms and inter-unit communication in multinationals: the case of Kone Elevators. Ph.D. dissertation. Helsinki, Finland: Helsinki School of Economics and Business Administration.
31. Marschan R., Welch D., Welch L. Control in less-hierarchical multinationals: the role of personal networks and informal communication. International Business Review. 5:1996;137-150.
32. Marschan R., Welch D., Welch L. Language: the forgotten factor in multinational management? European Management Journal. 15:1997;591-598.
33. Miles, M. & Huberman, M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
34. Mintzberg, H. (1983). Power in and around organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
35. Nohria, N. & Eccles, R. (1992). Face-to-face: making network organizations work. In N. Nohria, & R. Eccles, Networks and organizations: structure, form and action (pp. 288-308). Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
36. Nurmi, T. (1995). Expatriate's role in influencing the communication within multinationals: the case of Nokia Telecommunications. Master's Thesis. Helsinki, Finland: Helsinki School of Economics and Business Administration.
37. Pahlberg, C. (1996). Cultural differences and problems in hq-subsidiary relationships in MNCs. In Subsidiary-headquarters relationships in international business networks. Ph.D. dissertation. Uppsala, Sweden: Uppsala University.
38. Park H., Hwang S., Harrison K.J. Sources and consequences of communication problems in foreign subsidiaries: the case of United States firms in South Korea. International Business Review. 5:1996;79-98.
39. Patton, M. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
40. Pearson M. Languages in a multi-national company. The Linguist. 28:1989;146-147.
41. Perlmutter H. The tortuous evolution of the multinational corporation. Columbia Journal of World Business. 4(January-February):1969;9-18.
42. Pfeffer, J. (1981). Power in organizations. Boston, MA: Pitman.
43. Pucik V., Katz J. Information, control and human resource management in multinational firms. Human Resource Management. 25:1986;121-132.
44. Reeves N. The foreign language needs of U.K.-based corporations. Annals. 511(September):1990;60-73.
45. Reeves, N., & Wright, C. (1996). Linguistic auditing: a guide to identifying foreign language communication needs in corporations. Clevedon, Multilingual Matters Ltd.
46. Simon, H., Bauer, B., & Kaivola, K. (1996). Eurooppalainen johtaja: johtamiskulttuurit ja menestystekijat. Porvoo, Finland: Wsoy.
47. Sölvell Ö., Zander I. Organization of the dynamic multinational enterprise: the home-based and the heterarchical MNE. International Studies of Management. 25:1995;17-38.
48. Terpstra, V. (1972). International marketing. Hinsdale: Dryden Press.
49. Usunier, J. (1993). International marketing: a cultural approach. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
50. Victor, D. (1992). International business communication. New York: Harper Collins Publishers.
51. Yin, R. (1994). Case study research: design and methods (2nd ed.). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
52. ten Zijthoff, J. (1997). Phone conversation with KLM representative for Corporate Education, language training.