Technology and student-centered learning in higher education: Issues and practices

Journal of Computing in Higher Education

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 3-30

  Hannafin, Michael J ^a   Land, Susan M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^b PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

computer based learning; problem based learning; student centered learning

Indexed keywords

EID: 0002022343     PISSN: 10421726     EISSN: 18671233     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF03032712     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Aspy, D. N., Aspy, C. B., & Quimby, P. M. (1993). What doctors can teach teachers about problem-based learning. Educational Leadership, 50(7), 22-24.
2. Baumgartner, E., & Reiser, B. (1997, April). Inquiry through design: Situating and supporting inquiry through design projects in high school science classrooms. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching. Oak Brook, IL.
3. Blumenfeld, P., Soloway, E., Marx, R., Krajcik, J., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26 (3 & 4), 369-398.
4. Bransford, J., Franks, J., Vye, N., & Sherwood, R (1989). New approaches to instruction: Because wisdom can't be told. In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 470-497). New York: Cambridge University Press.
5. Brickhouse, N. W. (1994). Children's observations, ideas, and the development of classroom theories about light. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(6), 639-656.
6. Brown, A. L., Bransford, J. D., Ferrara, R. A., & Campione, J. C. (1983). Learning, remembering, and understanding. In J. H. Flavell & E. H. Markman (Eds.). Handbook of Child Psychology, Vol. 3, Cognitive Development (pp. 177-266). New York: Wiley.
7. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-41.
8. Carey, S. (1986). Cognitive science and science education. American Psychologist, 41(10), 1123-1130.
9. Chang, C-K, & McDaniel, E. D. (1995). Information search strategies in loosely structured settings. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 12(1), 95-107.
10. Chi, M., Feltovich, P., & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 8, 121-152.
11. Chinn, C., & Brewer, W. (1993). The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: A theoretical framework and implications for science instruction. Review of Educational Research, 63(1), 1-49.
12. Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt (1992). The Jasper Experiment: An exploration of issues in learning and instructional design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 40(1), 65-80.
13. deGroot, A. (1965). Thought and choice in chess. The Hague, The Netherlands: Mouton.
14. deJong, T., & van Joolingen, W. (1998). Scientific discovery learning with computer simulations of conceptual domains. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 179-201.
15. Dick, W. (1991). An instructional designer's view of constructivism. Educational Technology, 31(5), 41-44.
16. Fetterman, D. M. (1998). Webs of meaning: Computer and internet resources for educational research and instruction. Educational Researcher, 27(3), 22-30.
17. Garner, R., & Alexander, P. A. (1989). Metacognition: Answered and unanswered questions. Educational Psychologist, 24, 143-158.
18. Green, K. C. (1999). National survey of information technology in US higher education: The continuing challenge of instructional integration and user support. Encino, CA: California: Campus Computing. [ONLINE] Available at http://www. campuscomputing. net/.
19. Greene, B. A. (1995). Comprehension of text in an unfamiliar domain: Effects of instruction that provides either domain or strategy knowledge. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 20, 313-319.
20. Greeno, J. (1997). On claims that answer the wrong questions. Educational Researcher, 26(1), 5-17.
21. Hannafin, M. J. (1992). Emerging technologies, ISD, and learning environments: Critical perspectives. Educational Technology Research and Development, 40(1), 49-63.
22. Hannafin, M. J., Hannafin, K. M., Land, S., & Oliver, K. (1997) Grounded practice and the design of constructivist learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(3), 101-117.
23. Hannafin, M. J., Hill, J., & Land, S. (1997). Student-centered learning and interactive multimedia: Status, issues, and implications. Contemporary Education, 68(2), 94-99.
24. Hannafin, M. J., & Land, S. M. (1997). The foundations and assumptions of technology-enhanced, student-centered learning environments. Instructional Science, 25, 167-202.
25. Hannafin, M. J., Land, S. M., & Oliver, K. (1999). Open learning environments: Foundations, methods, and models. In C. Reigeluth's (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models, Volume II (pp. 115-140). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
26. Hannafin, M. J., & Rieber, L. P. (1989). Psychological foundations of instructional design for emerging computer-based instructional technologies: Part I. Educational Technology Research and Development, 37, 91-101.
27. Harless, W (1986). An interactive videodisc drama: The case of Frank Hall. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 13, 113-16.
28. Hill, J. R., & Hannafin, M. J. (1997). Cognitive strategies and learning from the world wide web. Educational Technology Research & Development, 45(4), 37-64.
29. Hmelo, C., & Day, R. (1999). Contextualized questioning to scaffold learning from simulations. Computers and Education, 32, 151-164.
30. Hooper, S., & Hannafin, M. J. (1991). Psychological perspectives on emerging instructional technologies: A critical analysis. Educational Psychologist, 26, 69-95.
31. Jungworth, E. (1987). Avoidance of logical fallacies - a neglected aspect of science-education and science-teacher education. Research in Science and Technological Education, 5, 43-58.
32. Kelly, G., & Crawford, T. (1996). Students' interactions with computer representations: Analysis of discourse in laboratory groups. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(7), 693-707.
33. Kitchener, K. S., & King, P. M. (1981). Reflective judgment: Concepts of justification and their relationship to age and education. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 2, 89-116.
34. Kolodner, J., & Guzdial, M. (2000). Theory and practice of case-based learning aids. In D. Jonassen & S. Land (Eds.), Theoretical foundations of learning environments (pp. 215-242). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
35. Koschmann, T. (1996), CSCL: Theory and practice of an emerging paradigm. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
36. Koschmann, T., Kelson, A., Feltovich, P., & Barrows, H. (1996). Computer-supported problem-based learning: A principle approach to use of computers in collaborative learning. In T. Koschmann (Ed.), CSCL: Theory and practice of an emerging paradigm (pp. 83-124). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
37. Kuhn, D. (1999). A developmental model of critical thinking. Educational Researcher, 28(2), 16-26, 46.
38. Laffey, J., Tupper, T., Musser, D., & Wedman, J. (1998). A computer-mediated support system for project-based learning. Educational Technology Research & Development, 46(1), 73-86.
39. Lajoie, S. (1993). Computer environments as cognitive tools for enhancing learning. In S. P. Lajoie & S. J. Derry (Eds.), Computers as Cognitive Tools (pp. 261-288). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
40. Land, S. M., & Greene, B. A. (2000). Project-based learning with the World Wide Web: A qualitative study of resource integration. Educational Technology Research & Development, 48(1), 45-67.
41. Land, S. M., & Hannafin, M. J. (2000). Student-centered learning environments. In D. Jonassen & S. Land (Eds), Theoretical foundations of learning environments (pp. 1-23). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
42. Land, S. M., & Hannafin, M. J. (1997). Patterns of understanding with open-ended learning environments: A qualitative study. Educational Technology Research & Development, 45(2), 47-73.
43. Land, S. M., & Hannafin, M. J. (1996). A conceptual framework for the development of theories-in-action with open-ended learning environments. Educational Technology Research & Development, 44(3), 37-53.
44. Lewis, E., Stern, J., & Linn, M. (1993). The effect of computer simulations on introductory thermodynamics understanding. Educational Technology, 33(1), 45-58.
45. Lin, X., Hmelo, C., Kinzer, C. & Secules, T. (1999). Designing technology to support reflection. Educational Technology Research & Development, 47(3), 43-62.
46. Loh, B., Radinsky, J., Reiser, B., Gomez, L., Edelson, D., & Russell, E. (1997). The Progress Portfolio: Promoting reflective inquiry in complex investigation environments. inProceedings of the 1997 Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. [Online] Available at http://www. oise. utoronto. ca/cscl/.
47. McCaslin, M., & Good, T. (1992). Compliant cognition: The misalliance of management and instructional goals in current school reform. Educational Researcher, 21(3), 4-17.
48. Merrill, M. D. (1991). Constructivism and instructional design. Educational Technology, 31(5), 45-53.
49. Moore, (1995). Information problem solving: A wider view of library skills. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 20, 1-31.
50. Nicaise, M., & Crane, M. (1999). Knowledge constructing through hypermedia authoring. Educational Technology Research & Development, 47(1), 29-50.
51. Oliver, K. (1999, February). Computer-based tools in support of internet-based problem solving. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology. St. Louis, MO.
52. Owston, R. D. (1997). The World Wide Web: A technology to enhance teaching and learning?Educational Researcher, 26(2), 27-33.
53. Pea, R. D. (1985). Beyond amplification: Using the computer to reorganize mental functioning. Educational Psychologist, 20(4), 167-182.
54. Perkins, D. N. (1986). Knowledge as design. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
55. Perkins, D. N. (1985). The fingertip effect: How information-processing technology shapes thinking. Educational Researcher, 14(7), 11-17.
56. Perkins, D., & Simmons, R. (1988). Patterns of misunderstanding: An integrative model for science, math, and programming. Review of Educational Research, 58, 303-326.
57. Petraglia, J. (1998). The real world on a short leash: The (mis)application of constructivism to the design of educational technology. Educational Technology Research & Development, 46(3), 53-65.
58. Rakes, G. (1996). Using the internet as a tool in a resource-based learning environment. Educational Technology, 36(5), 52-56.
59. Reigeluth, C. M., & Squire, K. (1998). Emerging work on the new paradigm of instructional theories. Educational Technology, 38(4), 41-47.
60. Resnick, M. (1998). Technologies for lifelong kindergarten. Educational Technology Research & Development, 46(4), 43-55.
61. TM. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(4), 329-347.
62. Salomon, G. (1986). Information technologies: What you see is not (always) what you get. Educational Psychologist, 20, 207-216.
63. Salomon, G. (1997, August). Novel constructivist learning environments and novel technologies: Some issues to be concerned with. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the European Association for Research in Learning and Instruction, Athens, Greece.
64. Salomon, G., Globerson, T., & Guterman, E. (1989). The computer as a zone of proximal development: Internalizing reading-related metacognitions from a Reading Partner. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 620-627.
65. Savery, J. R., & Duffy, T. M. (1996). Problem-based learning: An instructional model and its constructivist framework. In B. G. Wilson (Ed.), Constructivist learning environments: Case studies in instructional design (pp. 135-150). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
66. Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C., McLean, R., Swallow, J., & Woodruff, E. (1989). Computer-supported intentional learning environments. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 5, 51-68.
67. Schwartz, D., Brophy, S., Lin, X., & Bransford, J. (1999). Software for managing complex learning: Examples from an educational psychology course. Educational Technology Research & Development, 47(2), 39-59.
68. Shotsberger, P. (1996). Instructional uses of the World Wide Web: Exemplars and precautions. Educational Technology, 36(2), 47-50.
69. Soloway, E., Krajcik, J., Bkumenfeld, P., & Marx, R. (1996). Technological support for teachers transitioning to project-based science practices. In T. Koschmann (Ed.), CSCL: Theory and practice of an emerging paradigm (pp. 269-306). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
70. Spiro, R., Feltovich, P., Jacobson, M., & Coulson, R. (1991). Cognitive flexibility, constructivism, and hypertext: Random access instruction for advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains. Educational Technology, 5, 24-33.
71. Surry, D. W., & Land, S. M. (2000). Strategies for motivating higher education faculty to use technology. Innovations in Education and Training International, 37(2), 1-9.
72. Taylor, J., Dana, T., & Tasar, M. (1999, August). An integrated Engineering/Physics course for Elementary Education majors. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Association of Physics Teachers (AAPT), August 3-7, San Antonio, TX.