Real-time x-ray scattering study of surface morphology evolution during ion erosion and epitaxial growth of au(111)

Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

Volumn 60, Issue 24, 1999, Pages 16956-16964

  Kycia, S ^b   Headrick, R L ^b   Judy, A ^a   Cooper, B H ^a  

^a School of Chemical and Molecular Engineering   (United States)

^b Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0001111954     PISSN: 10980121     EISSN: 1550235X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.60.16956     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. E. A. Eklund, R. Bruinsma, J. Rudnick, and R. S. Williams, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 1759 (1991).
2. E. Chason, T. M. Mayer, B. K. Kellerman, D. T. McIlroy, and A. J. Howard, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 3040 (1994).
3. T. M. Mayer, E. Chason, and A. J. Howard, J. Appl. Phys. 76, 1633 (1994).
4. S. Rusponi, G. Costatini, C. Boragno, and U. Valbusa, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 2735 (1998).
5. M. V. R. Murty, T. Curcic, A. Judy, B. H. Cooper, A. R. Woll, J. D. Brock, S. Kycia, and R. L. Headrick, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 4713 (1998).
6. T. Michely and G. Comsa, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 82, 207 (1993).
7. S. J. Chey, J. E. van Nostrand, and D. G. Cahill, Phys. Rev. B 52, 16 696 (1995).
8. M. V. R. Murty, B. Cowles, and B. H. Cooper, Surf. Sci. 415, 328 (1998).
9. A.-L. Barabasi and H. E. Stanley, in Fractal Concepts in Surface Growth (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995).
10. S. S. P. Parkin, Z. G. Li, and K. J. Smith, Appl. Phys. Lett. 58, 2710 (1991).
11. G. Rosenfeld, B. Poelsema, and G. Comsa, in Growth and Properties of Ultrathin Epitaxial Layers, edited by D. A. King and D. P. Woodruff, The Chemical Physics of Solid Surfaces (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1997), Vol. 8, Chap. 3.
12. R. Kunkel, B. Poelsema, L. K. Verheij, and G. Comsa, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 733 (1990).
13. M. Kalff, G. Comsa, and T. Michely, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 1255 (1998).
14. T. Michely, M. Hohage, S. Esch, and G. Comsa, Surf. Sci. Lett. 349, L89 (1996).
15. C. A. Lang, M. M. Dovek, J. Nogami, and C. F. Quate, Surf. Sci. Lett. 224, L947 (1989).
16. Y. Li and A. E. DePristo, Surf. Sci. 351, 189 (1996).
17. M. Siegert and M. Plishcke, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 1517 (1994).
18. R. L. Headrick, S. Kycia, Y. K. Park, A. R. Woll, and J. D. Brock, Phys. Rev. B 54, 14 686 (1996).
19. J. Perdereau, J. P. Biberian, and G. E. Rhead, J. Phys. F: 4, 798 (1974).
20. U. Harten, A. M. Lahee, J. P. Toennies, and Ch. Woll, Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 2619 (1985).
21. Ch. Woll, S. Chiang, R. J. Wilson, and P. H. Lippel, Phys. Rev. B 39, 7988 (1989).
22. J. V. Barth, H. Brune, G. Ertl, and R. J. Behm, Phys. Rev. B 42, 9307 (1990).
23. A. R. Sandy, S. G. J. Mochrie, D. M. Zehner, K. G. Huang, and D. Gibbs, Phys. Rev. B 43, 4667 (1991).
24. The position (Formula presented) was chosen to reduce the contribution from the second harmonic (λ=0.062 nm) in the incident beam (which was passed by the (Formula presented) multilayer monochromator).
25. The herringbone pattern on Au(111) causes small changes in the spacings between layers near the surface and an increase in the atomic density in the top layer (Refs. 20, 21). Changes in the surface reconstruction during ion irradiation and homoepitaxy do not affect the qualitative conclusions drawn from the specular beam intensity measurements in Secs. IV and V. For the transverse x-ray scans through the (Formula presented) position reported in Secs. VI and VII, the influence of the reconstruction on the intensity is less than 1%.
26. P. Bedrossian, J. E. Houston, J. Y. Tsao, E. Chason, and S. T. Picraux, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 124 (1991).
27. P. Bedrossian and T. Klitsner, Phys. Rev. B 44, 13 783 (1991).
28. B. Poelsema, L. K. Verheij, and G. Comsa, Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 2500 (1984).
29. T. Michely, K. H. Besocke, and G. Comsa, Surf. Sci. Lett. 230, L135 (1990).
30. K. P. Reimann, A. Rehmet, W. Bolse, and U. Geyer, Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 439, 361 (1997).
31. The coverage of layers 0 (substrate), 1 and 2 after deposition of ≈1 ML in Ref. 15 indicate that the specular beam intensity at the anti-Bragg position after 1-ML deposition should be about 30–40% of the starting value.
32. G. Rosenfeld, N. N. Lipkin, W. Wulfhekel, J. Kliewer, K. Morgenstern, B. Poelsema, and G. Comsa, Appl. Phys. A: Solids Surf. 61, 455 (1991).
33. J. Tersoff, A. W. D. van der Gon, and R. M. Tromp, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 266 (1994).
34. J. Villain, J. Phys. I 1, 19 (1991).
35. J. G. Amar and F. Family, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 4584 (1996).
36. M. V. R. Murty and B. H. Cooper (to be published).
37. M. D. Johnson, C. Orme, A. W. Hunt, D. Graff, J. Sudijono, L. M. Sander, and B. G. Orr, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 116 (1994).
38. J. A. Stroscio, D. T. Pierce, M. D. Stiles, A. Zangwill, and L. M. Sander, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 4246 (1995).
39. H.-J. Ernst, F. Fabre, R. Folkerts, and J. Lapujoulade, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 112 (1994).
40. J.-K. Zuo and J. F. Wendelken, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 2791 (1997).
41. M. Plischke and B. Bergersen, Equilibrium Statistical Physics (Prentice Hall, NJ, 1989), Chap. 4.
42. H. You, K. G. Huang, and R. T. Kampwirth, Physica B 221, 77 (1996).
43. Y.-P. Zhao, H.-N. Yang, G.-C. Wang, and T.-M. Lu, Phys. Rev. B 57, 1922 (1998).