Thinking with Hands, Eyes, and Signs: MultiModal Science Talk in a Grade 6/7 Unit on Simple Machines

Interactive Learning Environments

Volumn 4, Issue 2, 1994, Pages 170-187

  Roth, Wolff Michael ^a  

^a SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000512045     PISSN: 10494820     EISSN: 17445191     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1049482940040204     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Amann, K., & Knorr-Cetina, K. D. (1988). The fixation of (visual) evidence. in M. Lynch & S. Woolgar (Eds.), Representation in scientific practice (pp. 85–121). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Bastide, F. (1990). The iconography of scientific texts: Principles of analysis. in M. Lynch & S. Woolgar (Eds.), Representation in scientific practice (pp. 187–229). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3. DiSessa, A., & Minstrel, J. (in press). Cultivating conceptual change with benchmark lessons. in J. G. Greeno (Ed.), Thinking practices. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Edwards, D. (1993). But what do children really think?: Discourse analysis and conceptual content in children’s talk. Cognition and Instruction, 11, 207–225.
5. Edwards, D., & Potter, J. (1992). Discursive psychology. London: Sage.
6. Ehn, P., & Kyng, M. (1991). Cardboard computers: Mocking-it-up or hands-on the future. in J. Greenbaum & M. Kyng (Eds.), Design at work: Cooperative design of computer systems (pp. 169–195). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
7. Gerber, R., Boulton-Lewis, G., & Bruce, C. (1995). Children’s understanding of graphic representations of quantitative data. Learning and Instruction, 5, 77–100.
8. Godfrey, L., & O’Connor, M. C. (1995). The vertical hand span: Non-standard units, expressions and symbols in the classroom. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 14, 327–346.
9. Gooding, D. (1992). Putting agency back into experiment. in A. Pickering (Ed.), Science as practice and culture (pp. 65–112). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
10. Heath, C., & Luff, P. (1993). Disembodied conduct: Interactional asymmetries in video-mediated communication. in G. Button (Ed.), Technology in working order: Studies of work, interaction, and technology (pp. 35–54). London and New York: Routledge.
11. Jordan, B., & Henderson, A. (1995). Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4, 39–103.
12. Knorr-Cetina, K. D., & Amann, K. (1990). Image dissection in natural scientific inquiry. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 15, 259–283.
13. Lakin, F. (1990). Visual languages for cooperation: A performing medium approach to systems for cooperative work. in J. Galegher, R. E. Kraut, & C. Egido (Eds.), Intellectual teamwork: Social and technological foundations of cooperative work (pp. 453–488). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
14. Lave, J. (1993). The practice of learning. in S. Chaiklin & J. Lave (Eds.), Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context (pp. 3–32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
16. Lemke, J. L. (1993). Intertextuality and educational research. Linguistics and Education, 4, 257–268.
17. Lemke, J. L. (in press). Multiplying meaning: Visual and verbal semiotics in scientific text. in J. R. Martin (ed.), Scientific Discourse. New York: Longman.
18. Luff, P., & Heath, C. (1993). System use and social organization: Observations on human-computer interaction in an architectural practice. in G. Button (Ed.), Technology in working order: Studies of work, interaction, and technology (pp. 184–210). London and New York: Routledge.
19. Lynch, M. (1985). Art and artifact in laboratory science: A study of shop work and shop talk in a laboratory. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
20. McGinn, M. K., & Roth, W.-M. (1996, April). Affordances and constraints of physical arrangement, social configuration, and display artifacts to participation in classroom discourse in a grade 617 unit on simple machines. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY.
21. McGinn, M. K., Roth, W.-M., Boutonné, S., & Woszczyna, C. (1995). The transformation of individual and collective knowledge in elementary science classrooms that are organized as knowledge-building communities. Research in Science Education, 25, 163–189.
22. Orsolini, M. (1993). “Dwarfs do not shoot”: An analysis of children’s justifications. Cognition and Instruction, 11, 281–297.
23. Orsolini, M., & Pontecorvo, C. (1992). Children’s talk in classroom discussions. Cognition and Instruction, 9, 113–136.
24. Pea, R. D., Sipusic, M., & Allen, S. (in press). Seeing the light on optics: Classroom-based research and development of a learning environment for conceptual change. in S. Strauss (Ed.), Development and learning environments. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
25. Pollner, M. (1987). Mundane reason: Reality in everyday and sociological discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26. Poole, D. (1994). Routine testing practices and the linguistic construction of knowledge. Cognition and Instruction, 12, 125–150.
27. Rorty, R. (1989). Contingency, irony, and solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28. Roschelle, J. (1992). Learning by collaborating: Convergent conceptual change. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 235–276.
29. Roschelle, J. (1994). Designing for cognitive communication: Epistemic fidelity or mediating collaborative inquiry? The Arachnet Electronic Journal on Virtual Culture [On-line serial], 2(2). [anonymous ftp byrd.mu.wvnet.edu]
30. Roth, W.-M. (1994). Student views of collaborative concept mapping: An emancipatory research project. Science Education, 78, 1–34.
31. Roth, W.-M. (1995a). Authentic school science: Knowing and learning in open-inquiry laboratories. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishing.
32. Roth, W.-M. (1995b). Affordances of computers in teacher-student interactions: The case of Interactive Physics™. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 329–347.
33. Roth, W.-M. (in press-a). The co-evolution of situated language and physics knowing. Journal of Science Education and Technology.
34. Roth, W.-M. (in press-b). Unterricht über einfache Maschinen im 6. und 7. Schuljahr-geplant und analysiert aus einer sozial-konstruktivistischen Perspektive des Lernens [Learning about simple machines in Grade 6/7: A social-constructivist perspective]. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften, 2.
35. Roth, W.-M., & Roychoudhury, A. (1992). The social construction of scientific concepts or the concept map as conscription device and tool for social thinking in high school science. Science Education, 76, 531–557.
36. Roth, W.-M., Woszczyna, C., & Smith, G. (in press). Affordances and constraints of computers in science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching.
37. Sherin, B., DiSessa, A. A., & Hammer, D. (1993). Dynaturtle revisited: Learning physics through collaborative design of a computer model. Interactive Learning Environments, 3, 91–118.
38. Suchman, L. A. (1990). Representing practice in cognitive science. in M. Lynch & S. Woolgar (Eds.), Representation in scientific practice (pp. 301–321). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
39. Suchman, L. A., & Trigg, R. H. (1991). Understanding practice: Video as a medium for reflection and design. in J. Greenbaum & M. Kyng (Eds.), Design at work: Cooperative design of computer systems (pp. 65–89). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
40. Suchman, L. A., & Trigg, R. H. (1993). Artificial intelligence as craftwork. in S. Chaiklin & J. Lave (Eds.), Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context (pp. 144–178). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41. Théberge, C. L. (1993, April), 'x2018;The boys all scramble through’: Some gender issues in sense-making conversations. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Rersearch Association, Atlanta, GA.
42. Warren, B., & Roseberry, A. S. (1995). Equity in the future tenses: Redefining relationships among teachers, students, and science in linguistic minority classrooms. in W. Secada, E. Fennema, & L. Byrd (Eds.), New directions in equity for mathematics education (pp. 298–328). New York: Cambridge University Press.