A molecular evaluation of the monophyly of the order Ebenales based upon rbcL sequence data

Systematic Botany

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 567-586

  Morton, C M ^a,d   Chase, M W ^a   Kron, K A ^b   Swensen, S M ^c  

^a ROYAL BOTANIC GARDENS   (United Kingdom)

^b WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c ITHACA COLLEGE   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF READING   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ASTERIDS; CLETHRACEAE; DIAPENSIACEAE; EBENACEAE; ERICALES; LECYTHIDACEAE; POLEMONIACEAE; SAPOTACEAE; STYRACACEAE; STYRAX; SYMPLOCACEAE;

EID: 0042193760     PISSN: 03636445     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/2419616     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. ADAMS, E. N., III. 1972. Consensus techniques and the comparison of taxonomic trees. Systematic Zoology 21: 390-397.
2. ALBERT, V. A., S. E. WILLIAMS, and M. W. CHASE. 1992. Carnivorous plants: phylogeny and structural evolution. Science 257: 1491-1495.
3. ANDERBERG, A. A. 1992. The circumscription of Ericales, and their cladistic relationships to other families of "higher dicotyledons." Systematic Botany 17: 660-675.
4. _. 1993. Cladistic inter-relationships and major clades of Ericales. Plant Systematics and Evolution 184: 207-231.
5. BAAS, P. 1986. Terminology of imperforate tracheary elements - in defense of libriform fibres with minutely bordered pits. International Association of Wood Anatomists, News Bulletin 7: 82-86.
6. BAKHUIZEN VAN DEN BRINK, R. C. (1936-55). Revisio Ebenacearum Malayensium. Bulletin. Jardin Botanique de Buitenzorg, ser. 3, 15: 1-49 (1936); 50-368 (1938); 369-515 (1941); i-xx, p. 1-92 (1955).
7. BAKHUIZEN VAN DEN BRINK, R. C. (1936-55). Revisio Ebenacearum Malayensium. Bulletin. Jardin Botanique de Buitenzorg, ser. 3, 15: 1-49 (1936); 50-368 (1938); 369-515 (1941); i-xx, p. 1-92 (1955).
8. BAKHUIZEN VAN DEN BRINK, R. C. (1936-55). Revisio Ebenacearum Malayensium. Bulletin. Jardin Botanique de Buitenzorg, ser. 3, 15: 1-49 (1936); 50-368 (1938); 369-515 (1941); i-xx, p. 1-92 (1955).
9. BAKHUIZEN VAN DEN BRINK, R. C. (1936-55). Revisio Ebenacearum Malayensium. Bulletin. Jardin Botanique de Buitenzorg, ser. 3, 15: 1-49 (1936); 50-368 (1938); 369-515 (1941); i-xx, p. 1-92 (1955).
10. BREMER, K. 1988. The limits of amino acid sequence data in angiosperm phylogenetic reconstruction. Evolution 42: 795-803.
11. CARLQUIST, S. 1976a. Wood anatomy of Roridulaceae: ecological and phylogenetic implications. American Journal of Botany 63: 1003-1008.
12. _. 1976b. Wood anatomy of Bybidaceae. Botanical Gazette 137: 35-38.
13. CHASE, M. W., D. E. SOLTIS, R. G. OLMSTEAD, D. MORGAN, D. H. LES, B. D. MISHLER, M. R. DUVALL, R. A. PRICE, H. G. HILLS, Y.-L. QIU, K. A. KRON, J. H. RETTIG, E. CONTI, J. D. PALMER, J. R. MANHART, K. J. SYTSMA, H. J. MICHAELS, W. J. KRESS, K. G. KAROL, W. D. CLARK, M. HEDREN, B. S. GAUT, R. K. JANSEN, K.-J. KIM, C. F. WIMPEE, J. F. SMITH, G. R. FURNIER, S. H. STRAUSS, Q.-Y. XIANG, G. M. PLUNKETT, P. S. SOLTIS, S. M. SWENSEN, S. E. WILLIAMS, P. A. GADEK, C. J. QUINN, L. E. EGUIARTE, E. GOLENBERG, G. H. LEARN, JR., S. W. GRAHAM, S. C. H. BARRETT, S. DAYANANDAN, and V. A. ALBERT. 1993. Phylogenetics of seed plants: an analysis of nucleotide sequences from the plastid gene rbcL. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 80: 528-580.
14. CONRAN, J. G. and J. M. DOWD. 1993. The phylogenetic relationships of Byblis and RORIDULA (BYBLIDACEAE-RORIDULACEAE INFERRED FROM PARTIAL 18S RIBOSOMAL RNA SEQUENCES). PLANT SYSTEMATICS AND EVOLUTION 188: 73-86.
15. CRONQUIST, A. 1981. An integrated system of classification of flowering plants. New York: Columbia Univ. Press.
16. _. 1988. The evolution and classification of flowering plants. 2d ed. New York: New York Botanical Gardens.
17. DAHLGREN, R. 1983. General aspects of angiosperm evolution and macrosystematics. Nordic Journal of Botany 3: 119-149.
18. _. 1989. The last Dahlgrenogram system of classification of the dicotyledons. Pp. 249-260 in The Davis and Hedge Festschrift: plant taxonomy, phytogeography and related subjects, ed. K. Tan. Edinburgh: Edinburgh Univ. Press.
19. DAVIS, G. L. 1966. Systematic embryology of the angiosperms. New York: Wiley.
20. DEBUHR, L. E. 1975. Phylogenetic relationships of the Sarraceniaceae. Taxon 24: 297-306.
21. _. 1977. Wood anatomy of the Sarraceniaceae; ecological and evolutionary implications. Piant Systematics and Evolution 128: 159-169.
22. DIELS, L. 1914. Diapensiaceen-Studien. Botanische Jahrbucher fur Systematik, Pflanzengeshichte und Pflanzengeographie 50: 304-30.
23. _. 1930. Byblidaceae. In Die naturlichen Pflanzenfamilien, 2d ed., 18A, eds. A. Engler and E. Prantl.
24. DICKISON, W. C. 1993. Floral anatomy of the Styracaceae, including observations on intra-ovarian trichomes. Journal of the Linnean Society, Botany 112: 223-255.
25. _ and K. D. PHEND. 1985. Wood anatomy of the Styracaceae: evolutionary and ecological considerations. International Association of Wood Anatomists, News Bulletin 6: 3-22.
26. DOYLE, J. J. and J. L. DOYLE. 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochemical Bulletin 19: 11-15.
27. ERDTMAN, G. 1952. Pollen morphology and plant taxonomy. Angiosperms. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.
28. ERIKSSON, T. 1995. Auto Decay version 3.0. Harvard Univ. Herbaria.
29. FARRIS, J. S., V. A. ALBERT, M. KALLERSJO, D. LIPSCOMB, and A.G. KLUGE. 1997. Parsimony jackknifing outperforms neighbor-joining. Cladistics 12: 99-124.
30. FAY, M. F., S. M. SWENSEN, and M. W. CHASE. 1995. Molecular systematics of Medusagynaceae. American Journal of Botany 82: 129.
31. FITCH, W. M. 1971. Toward defining the course of evolution; minimum change for a specific tree topology. Systematic Zoology 20: 406-416.
32. GOLDBERG, A. 1986. Classification, evolution and phylogeny of the families of dicotyledons. Smithsonian Contributions to Botany 58: 122-124.
33. GREY-WILSON, C. 1980. Hydrocera triflora, its floral morphology and relationship with Impatiens. Studies in Balsaminaceae: V. Kew Bulletin 35: 213-220.
34. GURKE, M 1897. Ebenaceae, in Die naturlichen Pflanzenfamilien, 4(1)A, eds. A. Engler and K. Prantl.
35. HIERN, W. P. 1873. A monograph of Ebenaceae. Transactions of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 12: 1-300.
36. HUTCHINSON, J. 1967. The genera of flowering plants. Dicotyledons. Vol. II. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
37. _. 1969. Evolution and phylogeny of flowering plants. Dicotyledons: facts and theory. New York: Academic Press.
38. _. 1973. The families of flowering plants. 3rd. ed. Vol. 1. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
39. JANSSONIUS, H. H. 1906-36. Mikrographie des Holzes der auf Java vorkommenden Baumarten. 6 vols. Leiden.
40. JUDD, W. S. and K. A. KRON. 1993. Circumscription of Ericaceae (Ericales) as determined by preliminary cladistic analyses based on morphological, anatomical, and embryological features. Brittonia 45: 99-114.
41. KENG, H. 1962. Comparative morphological studies in Theaceae. University of California Publications in Botany 33: 269-384.
42. KIM, KI-JOONG, R. K. JANSEN, and R. G. OLMSTEAD. 1994. Multiple origins of sympetaly in dicots. American Journal of Botany 81: 165.
43. KRON, K. A. 1996. Phylogenetic relationships of Empetraceae, Epacridaceae, Ericaceae, Monotropaceae, and Pyrolaceae: Evidence from nuclear ribosomal 18s sequence data. Annals of Botany 77: 293-303.
44. _ and M. W. CHASE. 1993. Systematics of the Ericaceae, Empetraceae, Epacridaceae and related taxa based upon rbcL sequence data. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 80: 735-741.
45. MADDISON, D. R. 1991. The discovery and importance of multiple islands of most parsimonious trees. Systematic Zoology 40: 315-328.
46. MAGUIRE, B., C. DE ZEEUW, Y. HUANG, and C. C. CLARE, JR. 1972. Tetrameristaceae. In: The botany of the Guayana Highland - Part IX. Memoirs of the New York Botanical Garden 23: 165-192.
47. METCALFE, C. R. and L. CHALK. 1950. Anatomy of the dicotyledons. Vol. I and II. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
48. _ and _. 1957. Anatomy of the dicotyledons. Cambridge: Oxford Univ. Press.
49. _ and _. 1979. Anatomy of the dicotyledons. 2nd. ed. Vol I. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
50. _ and _. 1983. Anatomy of the dicotyledons. 2nd. ed. Vol II. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
51. MORTON, C. M. 1994. The use of pollen morphology and wood anatomy in the study of the phylogeny of Ebenaceae. Ph.D. Dissertation, New York Botanical Garden/City University of New York.
52. _ and W. C. DICKISON. 1992. Comparative pollen morphology of the Styracaceae. Grana 31:1-15.
53. _, S. A. MORI, G. T. PRANCE, K. G. KAROL, and M. W. CHASE. 1997. Phylogenetic Relationships of Lecythidaceae: A Cladistic Analysis using rbcL Sequence and Morphological Data. American Journal of Botany (in press).
54. NARAYANA, L. L. 1965. Contributions to the embryology of Balsaminaceae. Japanese Journal of Botany 40: 104-116.
55. _. 1974. Contributions to the floral anatomy of Balsaminaceae. Japanese Journal of Botany 49: 315-322.
56. NOOTEBOOM, H. P. 1975. Revision of the Symplocaceae of the Old World, New Caledonia excepted. Leiden Botanical Series 1: 1-335.
57. OLMSTEAD, R. G., H. J. MICHAELS, K. M. SCOTT, and J. D. PALMER. 1992. Monophyly of the Asteridae and identification of their major lineages inferred from DNA sequences of rbcL. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 79: 249-265.
58. _, B. BREMER, K. M. SCOTT, and J. D. PALMER. 1993. A parsimony analysis of the Asteridae sensu lato based on rbcL sequences. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 80: 700-722.
59. PALSER, B. F. 1963. Studies of floral morphology in the Ericales VI. The Diapensiaceae. Botanical Gazette 124: 200-219.
60. PENNINGTON, T. D. 1990. Sapotaceae. Flora Neotropica, 52. New York Botanical Garden.
61. _. 1991. The genera of Sapotaceae. New York Botanical Garden and Royal Botanic Gardens.
62. PHILIPSON, W. R. 1974. Ovular morphology and the major classification of the dicotyledons. Journal of the Linnean Society, Botany 8: 89-108.
63. SANGER, F. 1981. Determination of nucleotide sequences in DNA. Science 214: 1205-1210.
64. SCHADEL, W. E. and W. C. DICKISON. 1979. Leaf anatomy and venation patterns of the Styracaceae. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 60: 8-37.
65. SOLTIS, D. E., P. S. SOLTIS, D. L. NICKRENT, L. A. JOHNSON, W. J. HAHN, S. B. HOOT, J. A. SAKAMOTO, R. K. KUZOFF, K. A. KRON, M. W. CHASE, S. M. SWENSEN, E. A. ZIMMER, S. CHAW, L. J. GILLESPIE, and K. J. SYTSMA. 1997. Phylogenetic relationships among angiosperms inferred from 18S rDNA sequences. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden (in press).
66. SWAMY, B. G. L. 1948. A contribution to the embryology of the Marcgraviaceae. American Journal of Botany 35: 628-633.
67. SWENSEN, S. M. and M. W. CHASE. 1995. Relationships of Theales sensu Cronquist from the perspective of cladistic analyses of rbcL sequence data. American Journal of Botany 82: 166.
68. SWOFFORD, D. L. 1993. PAUP: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony, version 3.1.1. Champaign: Illinois Natural History Survey.
69. TAKHTAJAN, A. 1987. Systema Magnoliophytorum. Leningrad: Officina Editoria Nauka.
70. THORNE, R. F. 1992. An updated phylogenetic classification of the flowering plants. Aliso 13: 365-389.
71. TSOU, C.-H. 1995. Embryology of Theaceae - Anther and ovule development of Adinandra, Cleyera and Eurya. Journal of Plant Research 108: 77-86.
72. VANI-HARDEV, B. 1972. Systematic embryology of Roridula gorgonias. Beiträge zur Biologie der Pflanzen 48: 339-351.
73. WAGENITZ, G. 1964. Ebenales, in Syllabus der pflanzenfamilien. Angiospermen (12 ed.), ed. A. Engler. Berlin: Gebruder Borntrager.
74. WHITE, F. 1983. Ebenaceae, in flora Zambesiaca. Vol. 7. Edinburgh: Clark Constable.