Satiation and compensation for short-term changes in food quality and availability in young Steller sea lions (Eumetopias jubatus)

Canadian Journal of Zoology

Volumn 82, Issue 7, 2004, Pages 1061-1069

  Rosen, David A S ^a   Trites, Andrew W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ECOLOGY; ECOSYSTEMS; ENERGY UTILIZATION;

DIGESTIVE CAPACITY; FOOD ENERGY CONTENT; FORAGING THEORY;

BIODIVERSITY;

DIGESTION; FOOD AVAILABILITY; FOOD INTAKE; FOOD QUALITY; PINNIPED;

ANIMALIA; CLUPEA HARENGUS; EUMETOPIAS JUBATUS; MALLOTUS VILLOSUS; OTARIIDAE; PANTHERA LEO; VERTEBRATA;

EID: 9944221619     PISSN: 00084301     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/Z04-082     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Ainley, D.G., Sydeman, W.J., and Norton, J. 1995. Upper trophic level predators indicate interannual negative and positive anomalies in the California Current food web. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 118: 69-79.
2. Alaska Sea Grant. 1993. Is it food? Addressing marine mammal and sea bird declines. Alaska Sea Grant Report 93-01. University of Alaska, Fairbanks, Alaska.
3. Anthony, J.A., Roby, D.D., and Turco, K.R. 2000. Lipid content and energy density of forage fishes from the northern Gulf of Alaska. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 248: 53-78.
4. Barrett, R.T. 1996. Prey harvest, chick growth, and production of three seabird species in Bleiksoy, North Norway, during years of variable food availability. Can. Wildl. Serv. Occas. Pap. No. 91: 20-26.
5. Blundell, J.E., and Stubbs, R.J. 1999. High and low carbohydrate and fat intakes: limits imposed by appetite and palatability and their implications for energy balance. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 53(Suppl. 1): S148-S165.
6. Boily, P., and Lavigne, D.M. 1997. Developmental and seasonal changes in resting metabolic rates of captive female grey seals. Can. J. Zool. 75: 1781-1789.
7. Boyd, I.L. 2002. Estimating food consumption of marine predators: Antarctic fur seals and macaroni penguins. J. Appl. Ecol. 39: 103-119.
8. Brody, S. 1945. Bioenergetics and growth. Hafner Press, New York.
9. Bryant, R., Jones, I.L., and Hipfner, J.M. 1999. Responses to changes in food availability by Common Murres and Thick-billed Murres at the Gannet Islands, Labrador. Can. J. Zool. 77: 1278-1287.
10. Castle, K.T., and Wunder, B.A. 1995. Limits to food intake and fiber utilization in the prairie vole, Microtus ochrogaster: effects of food quality and energy needed. J. Comp. Physiol. B, 164: 609-617.
11. Costa, D.P., and Gentry, R.L. 1986. Free-ranging energetics of northern fur seals. In Fur seals: maternal strategies on land and at sea. Edited by R.L. Gentry and G.L. Kooyman. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J. pp. 79-101.
12. Costa, D.P., Croxall, J.P., and Duck, C.D. 1989. Foraging energetics of Antarctic fur seals in relation to changes in prey availability. Ecology, 70: 596-606.
13. Eisen, S., Davis, J.D., Rauhofer, E., and Smith, G.P. 2001. Gastric negative feedback produced by volume and nutrient during a meal in rats. Am. J. Physiol. 281: R1201-R1214.
14. Emlen, J.M. 1966. The role of time and energy in food preference. Am. Nat. 100: 611-617.
15. Geraci, J.R., St. Aubin, D.J., and Smith, T.G. 1979. Influence of age, condition, sampling time and method on plasma chemical constituents in free-ranging ringed seals, Phoca hispida. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 36: 1278-1282.
16. Hammond, K.A., and Wunder, B.A. 1991. The role of diet quality and energy need in the nutritional quality of a small herbivore Microtus ochrogaster. Physiol. Zool. 64: 541-567.
17. Johnson, D.F., Ackroff, K., Peters, J., and Collier, G.H. 1986. Changes in rats' meal patterns as a function of the caloric density of the diet. Physiol. Behav. 36: 929-936.
18. Karasov, W.H., and Diamond, J. 1988. Interplay between physiology and ecology in digestion. BioScience, 38: 602-611.
19. Kitaysky, A.S., Piatt, J.F., Wingfield, J.C., and Romano, M. 1999. The adrenocortical stress-response of Black-legged Kittiwake chicks in relation to dietary restrictions. J. Comp. Physiol. B, 169: 303-310.
20. Krizova, E., Simek, V., Abelenda, M., and Puerta, M. 1996. Food intake and body weight in rats with daily food-availability restrictions. Physiol. Behav. 60: 791-794.
21. Lewis, C., Clark, T.W., and Derting, T.L. 2001. Food selection by the white-footed mouse (Permoyscus leucopus) on the basis of energy and protein contents. Can. J. Zool. 79: 562-568.
22. Litzow, M.A., Piatt, J.F., Prichard, A.K., and Roby, D.D. 2002. Response of pigeon guillemots to variable abundance of high-lipid and low-lipid prey. Oecologia, 132: 286-295.
23. Loeb, S.C., Schwab, R.G., and Demment, M.W. 1991. Response of pocket gophers Thomomys bottae to changes in diet quality. Oecologia, 86: 542-551.
24. Loughlin, T.R. 1998. The Steller sea lion: a declining species. Biosphere Conserv. 1: 91-98.
25. MacArthur, R.H., and Pianka, E.R. 1966. On optimal use of a patchy environment. Am. Nat. 100: 603-609.
26. Merrick, R.L., Chumbley, M.K., and Byrd, G.V. 1997. Diet diversity of Steller sea lions (Eumetopias jubatus) and their population decline in Alaska: a potential relationship. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 54: 1342-1348.
27. Olesiuk, P.F. 1993. Annual prey consumption by harbor seals (Phoca vitulina) in the Strait of Georgia, British Columbia. Fish. Bull. (Wash., D.C.), 91: 491-515.
28. Owen-Smith, N. 1994. Foraging responses of Kudus to seasonal changes in food resources: elasticity in constraints. Ecology, 75: 1050-1062.
29. Perry, G., and Pianka, E.R. 1997. Animal foraging: past, present and future. Trends Ecol. Evol. 12: 360-364.
30. Renouf, D., Gales, R., and Noseworthy, E. 1993. Seasonal variation in energy intake and condition of harp seals: is there a harp seal morph? Problems for bioenergetic modelling. J. Zool. (Lond.), 230: 513-528.
31. Rosen, D.A.S., and Renouf, D. 1998. Correlates to seasonal changes in metabolism in Atlantic harbour seals (Phoca vitulina concolor). Can. J. Zool. 76: 1520-1528.
32. Rosen, D.A.S., and Trites, A.W. 2000. Pollock and the decline of Steller sea lions: testing the junk food hypothesis. Can. J. Zool. 78: 1243-1250.
33. Rosen, D.A.S., and Trites, A.W. 2002. Changes in metabolism in response to fasting and food restriction in the Steller sea lion. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B, 132: 389-399.
34. Schoener, T.W. 1971. Theory of foraging strategies. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 2: 369-404.
35. Schwartz, M.W., Baskin, D.G., Kaiyala, K.J., and Woods, S.C. 1999. Model for the regulation of energy balance and adiposity by the central nervous system. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 69: 584-596.
36. Shettleworth, S.J. 1989. Animals foraging in the lab: problems and promises. J. Exp. Psychol. 15: 81-87.
37. Steffens, A.B., and Strubbe, J.H. 1987. Regulation of body weight and food intake. Science Progress 71: 545-562.
38. Trites, A.W., and Donnelly, C.P. 2003. The decline of Steller sea lions in Alaska: a review of the nutritional stress hypothesis. Mammal Rev. 33: 3-28.
39. Trites, A.W., and Larkin, P.A. 1996. Changes in the abundance of Steller sea lions (Eumetopias jubatus) in Alaska from 1956 to 1992: How many were there? Aquat. Mamm. 22: 153-166.
40. Van Pelt, T.I., Piatt, J.F., Lance, B.K., and Roby, D.D. 1997. Proximate composition and energy density of some North Pacific forage fishes. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A, 118: 1393-1398.
41. Voltura, M.B., and Wunder, B.A. 1998. Effects of ambient temperature, diet quality, and food restriction on body composition dynamics of the Prairie vole, Microtus ochrogaster. Physiol. Zool. 71: 321-328.
42. Warwick, Z.S., McGuire, C.M., Bowen, K.J., and Synowski, S.J. 2000. Behavioral components of high-fat diet hyperphagia: meal size and postprandial satiety. Am. J. Physiol. 278: R196-R200.
43. Weiner, J. 1992. Physiological limits to sustainable energy budgets in birds and mammals: ecological implications. Trends Ecol. Evol. 7: 384-388.
44. Winship, A.J., Trites, A.W., and Rosen, D.A.S. 2002. A bio-energetic model for estimating the food requirements of Steller sea lions (Eumetopias jubatus) in Alaska. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 229: 291-312.
45. Zynel, C.A., and Wunder, B.A. 2002. Limits to food intake by the Prairie vole: effects of time for digestion. Funct. Ecol. 16: 58-66.