Modulation of the impairment of hippocampectomized rats on the radial-arm maze cue task by visual characteristics and subicular damage

Behavioral Neuroscience

Volumn 118, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 1214-1224

  Allen, Kevin ^a   Potvin, Olivier ^a   Doré, François Y ^a   Goulet, Sonia ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

N METHYL DEXTRO ASPARTIC ACID;

ANALYTIC METHOD; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARM MOVEMENT; ARTICLE; BRAIN INJURY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENTORHINAL CORTEX; HIPPOCAMPUS; MAZE TEST; MEMORY; NONHUMAN; RADIAL ARM MAZE CUE TASK; RADIUS; RAT; SPATIAL ORIENTATION; STIMULUS RESPONSE; SUBICULUM; TASK PERFORMANCE; TRAINING; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; BRAIN DISEASES; CUES; EXCITATORY AMINO ACID AGONISTS; HIPPOCAMPUS; MALE; MAZE LEARNING; N-METHYLASPARTATE; RANDOM ALLOCATION; RATS; RATS, LONG-EVANS; SPACE PERCEPTION; SPATIAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 9644294393     PISSN: 07357044     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0735-7044.118.6.1214     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Brown, M. F., & Moore, J. A. (1997). In the dark. II: Spatial choice when access to extrinsic spatial cues is eliminated. Animal Learning & Behavior, 25, 335-346.
2. Bunsey, M., & Eichenbaum, H. (1995). Selective damage to the hippocampal region blocks long-term retention of a natural and nonspatial stimulus-stimulus association. Hippocampus, 5, 546-556.
3. Cassaday, H. J., & Rawlins, J. N. (1995). Fornix-fimbria section and working memory deficits in rats: Stimulus complexity and stimulus size. Behavioral Neuroscience, 109, 594-606.
4. Cassaday, H. J., & Rawlins, J. N. (1997). The hippocampus, objects, and their contexts. Behavioral Neuroscience, 111, 1228-1244.
5. Cassel, J. C., Cassel, S., Galani, R., Kelche, C., Will, B., & Jarrard, L. (1998). Fimbria-fornix vs selective hippocampal lesions in rats: Effects on locomotor activity and spatial learning and memory. Neurobiology of Learning & Memory, 69, 22-45.
6. Dubreuil, D., Tixier, C., Dutrieux, G., & Edeline, J. M. (2003). Does the radial arm maze necessarily test spatial memory? Neurobiology of Learning & Memory, 79, 109-117.
7. Eichenbaum, H., Otto, T., & Cohen, N. J. (1994). Two functional components of the hippocampal memory system. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 17, 449-518.
8. Etienne, A. S., Sitbon, S., Dahn-Hurni, C., & Maurer, R. (1994). Golden hamsters on the eight-arm maze in light and darkness: The role of dead reckoning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 47(B), 401-425.
9. Galani, R., Obis, S., Coutureau, E., Jarrard, L., & Cassel, J. C. (2002). A comparison of the effects of fimbria-fornix, hippocampal, or entorhinal cortex lesions on spatial reference and working memory in rats: Short versus long postsurgical recovery period. Neurobiology of Learning & Memory, 77, 1-16.
10. Galani, R., Weiss, I., Cassel, J. C., & Kelche, C. (1998). Spatial memory, habituation, and reactions to spatial and nonspatial changes in rats with selective lesions of the hippocampus, the entorhinal cortex or the subiculum. Behavioural Brain Research, 96, 1-12.
11. Hampson, R. E., Jarrard, L. E., & Deadwyler, S. A. (1999). Effects of ibotenate hippocampal and extrahippocampal destruction on delayed-match and -nonmatch-to-sample behavior in rats. Journal of Neuroscience, 19, 1492-1507.
12. Hetherington, P. A., & Shapiro, M. L. (1997). Hippocampal place fields are altered by the removal of single visual cues in a distance-dependent manner. Behavioral Neuroscience, 111, 20-34.
13. Higgs, S., Bannerman, D. M., & Rawlins, J. N. (2001). The effect of cytotoxic lesions of the hippocampus on recognition memory in the rat: Effects of stimulus size. Behavioral Neuroscience, 115, 1193-1203.
14. Howell, D. C. (1997). Statistical methods for psychology (4th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
15. Hudon, C., Doré, F. Y., & Goulet, S. (2002). Spatial memory and choice behavior in the radial arm maze after fornix transection. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry, 26, 1113-1123.
16. Hudon, C., Doré, F. Y., & Goulet, S. (2003a). Impaired performance of fornix-transected rats on a distal, but not on a proximal, version of the radial-arm maze cue task. Behavioral Neuroscience, 117, 1353-1362.
17. Hudon, C., Doré, F. Y., & Goulet, S. (2003b). Selective impairment of fornix-transected rats on a new nonspatial, odor-guided task. Hippocampus, 13, 48-52.
18. Jarrard, L. E. (1986). Selective hippocampal lesions and behavior: Implication for current research and theorizing. In R. L. Isaacson (Ed.), The hippocampus (pp. 93-126). New York: Plenum Press.
19. Jarrard, L. E. (1993). On the role of the hippocampus in learning and memory in the rat. Behavioral and Neural Biology, 60, 9-26.
20. Maaswinkel, H., Jarrard, L. E., & Whishaw, I. Q. (1999). Hippocampectomized rats are impaired in homing by path integration. Hippocampus, 9, 553-561.
21. Mazmanian, D. S., & Roberts, W. A. (1983). Spatial memory in rats under restricted viewing conditions. Learning and Motivation, 14, 123-139.
22. McDonald, R. J., & White, N. M. (1993). A triple dissociation of memory systems: Hippocampus, amygdala, and dorsal striatum. Behavioral Neuroscience, 107, 3-22.
23. Morris, R. G., Garrud, P., Rawlins, J. N., & O'Keefe, J. (1982, June 24). Place navigation impaired in rats with hippocampal lesions. Nature, 297, 681-683.
24. Morris, R. G., Schenk, F., Tweedie, F., & Jarrard, L. E. (1990). Ibotenate lesions of hippocampus and/or subiculum: Dissociating components of allocentric spatial learning. European Journal of Neuroscience, 2, 1016-1028.
25. Naber, P. A., Witter, M. P., & Lopes da Silva, F. H. (2000). Networks of the hippocampal memory system of the rat. The pivotal role of the subiculum. In H. E. Scharfman, M. Witter, & R. Schwarcz (Eds.), Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences: Vol. 911. The parahippocampal region: Implications for neurological and psychiatric diseases (pp. 392-403). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
26. Naber, P. A., Witter, M. P., & Lopes da Silva, F. H. (2001). Evidence for a direct projection from the postrhinal cortex to the subiculum in the rat. Hippocampus, 11, 105-117.
27. Nadel, L., & MacDonald, L. (1980). Hippocampus: Cognitive map or working memory? Behavioral and Neural Biology, 29, 405-409.
28. O'Keefe, J., & Nadel, L. (1978). The hippocampus as a cognitive map. London: Oxford University Press.
29. Olton, D. S., Becker, J. T., & Handelmann, G. E. (1979). Hippocampus, space and memory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2, 313-365.
30. Olton, D. S., & Feustle, W. A. (1981). Hippocampal function required for nonspatial working memory. Experimental Brain Research, 41, 380-389.
31. Olton, D. S., & Samuelson, R. J. (1976). Remembrance of places passed: Spatial memory in rats. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 2, 97-116.
32. O'Mara, S. M., Commins, S., Anderson, M., & Gigg, J. (2001). The subiculum: A review of form, physiology and function. Progress in Neurobiology, 64, 129-155.
33. Rasmussen, M., Barnes, C. A., & McNaughton, B. L. (1989). A systematic test of cognitive mapping, working-memory and temporal discontiguity theories of hippocampal function. Psychobiology, 17, 335-348.
34. Shapiro, M. L., Tanila, H., & Eichenbaum, H. (1997). Cues that hippocampal place cells encode: Dynamic and hierarchical representation of local and distal stimuli. Hippocampus, 7, 624-642.
35. Suzuki, S., Augerinos, G., & Black, A. H. (1980). Stimulus control of spatial behavior on the eight-arm maze in rats. Learning and Motivation, 11, 1-18.
36. Sziklas, V., & Petrides, M. (2002). Effects of lesions to the hippocampus or the fornix on allocentric conditional associative learning in rats. Hippocampus, 12, 543-550.
37. Yee, B. K., & Rawlins, J. N. (1994). The effects of hippocampal formation ablation or fimbria-fornix section on performance of a nonspatial radial arm maze task by rats. Journal of Neuroscience, 14, 3766-3774.
38. Zoladek, L., & Roberts, W. A. (1978). The sensory basis of spatial memory in the rat. Animal Learning & Behavior, 6, 77-81.