The hippocampus, objects, and their contexts

Behavioral Neuroscience

Volumn 111, Issue 6, 1997, Pages 1228-1244

  Cassaday, Helen J ^a   Rawlins, J N P ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; BRAIN INJURY; CONTROLLED STUDY; HIPPOCAMPUS; LEARNING; MEMORY; NONHUMAN; OBJECT RELATION; RAT; REINFORCEMENT; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ANIMALS; CEREBRAL DECORTICATION; CUES; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; HIPPOCAMPUS; MALE; MAZE LEARNING; RATS; RATS, INBRED STRAINS; SPACE PERCEPTION;

EID: 0031463520     PISSN: 07357044     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0735-7044.111.6.1228     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Aggleton, J. P. (1985). One trial object recognition by rats. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37B, 279-294.
2. Aggleton, J. P., Blindt, H. S., & Rawlins, J. N. P. (1989). The effects of amygdaloid and combined amygdaloid-hippocampal lesions upon object recognition and spatial working memory. Behavioral Neuroscience, 103, 962-974.
3. Aggleton, J. P., Hum, P. R., & Rawlins, J. N. P. (1986). The effects of hippocampal lesions upon spatial and non-spatial tests of working memory. Behavioural Brain Research, 19, 133-146.
4. Cassaday, H. J., & Rawlins, J. N. P. (1995). Fornix-timbria section and working memory deficits in rats: Stimulus complexity and stimulus size. Behavioral Neuroscience, 109, 594-606.
5. Clayton, N. S. (1995). Development of memory and the hippocampus: Comparison of food-storing and nonstoring birds on a one-trial associative memory test. Journal of Neuroscience, 15, 2796-2807.
6. Deacon, R. M. J., & Rawlins, J. N. P. (1995). Effects of aspiration lesions of hippocampus or overlying neocortex on concurrent and configural object discriminations in rats. Behavioural Brain Research, 77, 165-174.
7. Eichenbaum, H., Otto, T., & Cohen, N. J. (1994). Two functional components of the hippocampal memory system. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 17, 449-518.
8. Caftan, H. A., & Woolmore, A. L. (1996). Complex visual learning by rats. Learning and Motivation, 27, 375-399.
9. Herremans, A. H. J., Hijzen, T. H., & Slangen, J. L. (1995). The object delayed non-matching-to-sample task in rats does not depend on working memory. Neuroreport, 6, 1963-1965.
10. Hirsh, R. (1974). The hippocampus and contextual retrieval of information from memory: A theory. Behavioral and Neural Biology: 12, 421-444.
11. Iversen, I. H. (1993). Acquisition of matching-to-sample performance in rats using visual stimuli on nose keys. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 59, 471-482.
12. Jagielo, J. A., Nonneman, A. J., Isaac, W. L., & Jackson-Smith, P. A. (1990). Hippocampal lesions impair rats' performance of a non-spatial matching-to-sample task. Psychohiology, 18, 55-62.
13. Kamil, A. C., & Sacks, R. A. (1972). Three-configuration matching-to-sample in the pigeon. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 17, 483-488.
14. Kesner, R. P. (1991). The role of the hippocampus within an attribute model of memory. Hippocampus, 1, 279-282.
15. Leaton, R. N., & Borczcz, G. S. (1990). Hippocampal lesions and temporally chained conditioned stimuli in a conditioned suppression paradigm. Psychobiology, 18, 81-88.
16. Mumby, D. G. (1995). Assessing working memory for objects in rats: No one said it was easy. Neuroreport, 6, 1960-1962.
17. Mumby, D. G., Wood, E. R., & Pinel, J. P. (1992). Object-recognition memory is only mildly impaired in rats with lesions of the hippocampus and amygdala. Psychobiology, 20, 18-27.
18. Nadel, L. (1991). The hippocampus and space revisited. Hippocampus, 7, 221-229.
19. Nadel, L., & Willner, J. (1980). Context and conditioning: A place for space. Physiological Psychology, 8, 218-228.
20. O'Keefe, J., & Nadel, L. (1978). The hippocampus as a cognitive map. London: Oxford University Press.
21. Olton, D. S., Becker, J. T. & Handelmann, G. E. (1979). Hippocampus, space and memory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2, 315-365.
22. Olton, D. S., & Feustle, W. A. (1981). Hippocampal function required for non-spatial working memory. Experimental Brain Research, 41, 380-389.
23. Paxinos, G., & Watson, C. (1986). The rat brain in stereotaxic coordinates (2nd ed.). London: Academic Press.
24. Phillips, R. G., & LeDoux, J. E. (1992). Differential contribution of amgydala and hippocampus to cued an contextual fear conditioning. Behavioral Neuroscience, 106, 274-285.
25. Raffaele, K. C., & Olton, D. S. (1988). Hippocampal and amygdaloid involvement in working memory for non-spatial stimuli. Behavioral Neuroscience, 102, 355-369.
26. Rawlins, J. N. P. (1985). Associations across time: The hippocampus as a temporary memory store. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 8, 479-496.
27. Rawlins, J. N. P., & Bennett, R. C. (1980). A headholder for visually guided surgery in rats. Physiology and Behavior, 34, 415-416.
28. Rawlins, J. N. P., Deacon, R. M. J., Yee, B. K., & Cassaday, H. J. (1994). Does it still make sense to develop a declarative memory theory of hippocampal function? {Commentary}- Behavioral and Brain Science, 17, 492-493.
29. Rawlins, J. N. P., Lyford, G. L., Seferiades, A., Deacon, R. M. J., & Cassaday, H. J. (1993). Critical determinants of nonspatial working memory deficits in rats with conventional lesion of hippocampus or fornix. Behavioral Neuroscience, 107, 420-433.
30. Rawlins, J. N. P., & Tsaltas, E. (1983). The hippocampus, time and working memory. Behavioural Brain Research, 10, 233-262.
31. Restle, F. (1957). Discrimination of cues in mazes: A resolution of the "place-vs.-response" question. Psychological Review, 64, 217-228.
32. Rothblat, L. A., & Kromer, L. F. (1991). Object recognition memory in the rat: The role of the hippocampus. Behavioural Brain Research, 42, 25-32.
33. Seiden, N. R. W., Everitt, B. J., Jarrard J. E., & Robbins, T. E. (1991). Complementary roles for the amygdala and hippocampus in aversive conditioning to explicit and contextual cues. Neuroscience, 42, 335-350.
34. Shaw, C., & Aggleton, J. P. (1993). The effects of fornix and medial prefrontal lesions on delayed non-matching-to-sample by rats. Behavioural Brain Research, 54, 91-102.
35. Sidman, M. (1992). Adventitious control by the location of comparison stimuli in conditional discriminations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 58, 173-182.
36. Steele, K., & Rawlins, J. N. P. (1989). Rats remember long lists of nonspatial items. Psychohiology, 17, 450-452.
37. Sutherland, R. J., & Rudy, J. W. (1989). Configural association theory: The role of the hippocampal formation in learning, memory, and amnesia. Psychobiology, 17, 129-144.
38. Sutherland, R. J., & Rudy, J. W. (1995). Configural association theory and the hippocampal formation: An appraisal and reconfiguration. Hippocampus, 5, 375-389.
39. Winocur, G., & Olds, J. (1978). Effects of context manipulation on memory and reversal learning in rats with hippocampal lesions. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 92, 312-321.
40. Worden, R. P. (1992). Navigation by fragment fitting: A theory of hippocampal function. Hippocampus, 2, 165-188.
41. Xavier, G. F., Stein, C., & Bueno, O. F. A. (1990). Rats with dorsal hippocampal lesions do react to new stimuli but not to spatial changes of known stimuli. Behavioral and Neural Biology, 54, 172-183.
42. Yee, B. K., & Rawlins, J. N. P. (1994). The effects of hippocampal formation ablation or fimbria-fomix section on performance of a non-spatial radial arm maze task by rats. Journal of Neuroscience, 14, 3766-3774.