Spatial memory, habituation, and reactions to spatial and nonspatial changes in rats with selective lesions of the hippocampus, the entorhinal cortex or the subiculum

Behavioural Brain Research

Volumn 96, Issue 1-2, 1998, Pages 1-12

  Galani, R ^a   Weiss, I ^a   Cassel, J C ^a   Kelche, C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE STRASBOURG   (France)

Author keywords

Hippocampal formation; Locomotor activity; Object exploration; Reference memory; Selective lesion; Water maze; Working memory

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BRAIN INJURY; ENTORHINAL CORTEX; HIPPOCAMPUS; MALE; MAZE TEST; MEMORY CONSOLIDATION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; SPATIAL MEMORY; TASK PERFORMANCE; WORKING MEMORY;

ANIMALS; ENTORHINAL CORTEX; EXCITATORY AMINO ACID AGONISTS; EXPLORATORY BEHAVIOR; HABITUATION, PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGIC; HIPPOCAMPUS; IBOTENIC ACID; MALE; MAZE LEARNING; MEMORY; MOTOR ACTIVITY; RATS; SPACE PERCEPTION;

EID: 0032212301     PISSN: 01664328     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0166-4328(97)00197-6     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Amaral D.G., Witter M.P. The three-dimensional organization of the hippocampal formation: a review of anatomical data. Neuroscience. 31:1989;571-591.
2. Witter M.P., Groenewegen H.J., Lopes Da Silva F.H., Lohman A.H.M. Functional organization of the extinsic and intrinsic circuitry of the parahippocampal region. Prog Neurobiol. 33:1989;161-253.
3. O'Keefe J, Nadel L. The Hippocampus as a Cognitive Map. London: Oxford University Press, 1978.
4. Jarrard L.E. On the role of the hippocampus in learning and memory in the rat. Behav Neural Biol. 60:1993;9-26.
5. Morris R.G.M., Garrud P., Rawlins J.N.P., O'Keefe J. Place navigation impaired in rats with hippocampal lesions. Nature. 297:1982;681-683.
6. Morris R.G.M., Schenk F., Tweedie F., Jarrard L.E. Ibotenate lesions of hippocampus and/or subiculum: dissociating components of allocentric spatial learning. Eur J Neurosci. 2:1990;1016-1028.
7. Hunt M.E., Kesner R.P., Evans R.B. Memory for spatial location: functional dissociation of entorhinal cortex and hippocampus. Psychobiology. 22:1994;186-194.
8. Nagahara A.H., Otto T., Gallagher M. Entorhinal-perirhinal lesions impair performance of rats on two versions of place learning in the Morris water maze. Behav Neurosci. 109:1995;3-9.
9. Schenk F., Morris R.G.M. Dissociation between components of spatial memory in rats after recovery from the effects of retrohippocampal lesions. Exp Brain Res. 58:1985;11-28.
10. Skelton R.W., McNamara R.K. Bilateral knife cuts to the perforant path disrupt spatial learning in the Morris water-maze. Hippocampus. 1:1992;73-80.
11. Bolhuis J.J., Stewart C.A., Forrest E.M. Retrograde amnesia and memory reactivation in rats with ibotenate lesions to hippocampus or subiculum. Q J Exp Psychol. 47:1994;129-150.
12. Jarrard LE, Hyko A. Complementary roles for the hippocampus and entorhinal/perirhinal cortex in the acquisition of spatial and nonspatial tasks in the rat. Soc Neurosci Abst 1994:1015.
13. Morris R.G.M. Spatial localization does not require the presence of local cues. Learn Motiv. 12:1981;239-260.
14. Renner M.J. Neglected aspects of exploratory and investigatory behavior. Psychobiology. 18:1990;16-22.
15. Kimble DP. Choice behavior in rats with hippocampal lesions. In: Isaacson RL, Pribam KH, editors. The Hippocampus, vol. 2. New York: Plenum Press, 1975:309-26.
16. Wilz K.J., Bolton R.L. Exploratory behavior in response to the spatial rearrangement of familiar stimuli. Psychon Sci. 24:1971;117-118.
17. Thinus-Blanc C, Save E, Buhot M-C, Poucet B. The hippocampus, exploratory activity, and spatial memory. In: Paillard J, editors. Brain and Space. New York: Oxford University Press, 1991:334-52.
18. Save E., Poucet B., Foreman N., Buhot M.-C. Object exploration and reactions to spatial and nonspatial changes in hooded rats following damage to parietal cortex or hippocampal formation. Behav Neurosci. 106:1992;447-456.
19. Jarrard L.E. On the use of ibotenic acid to lesion selectively different components of the hippocampal formation. J Neurosci Methods. 29:1989;251-259.
20. Paxinos G, Watson P. The Rat Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates. New York: Academic Press, 1986.
21. Galani R., Jarrard L.E., Will B.E., Kelche C. Effects of postoperative housing conditions on functional recovery in rats with lesions of the hippocampus, subiculum or entorhinal cortex. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 67:1997;43-56.
22. Otto T., Eichenbaum H. Complementary roles of the orbital prefrontal cortex and the perirhinal-entorhinal cortices in an odor-guided delayed-nonmatching-to-sample task. Behav Neurosci. 106:1992;762-775.
23. Whishaw I.Q. Hippocampal, granule cell and CA3-4 lesions impair formation of a place learning-set in the rat and induce reflex epilepsy. Behav Brain Res. 24:1987;556-572.
24. Whishaw I.Q. A comparison of rats and mice in swimming pool place task and matching to place task: some surprising differences. Physiol Behav. 58:1995;687-693.
25. Wallenstein S., Zucker C.L., Fleiss J.L. Some statistical methods useful in circulation research. Circ Res. 47:1980;1-9.
26. Winer BJ, editor. Statistical Principles in Experimental Design. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1971.
27. Gray J.A., McNaughton N. Comparison between the behavioural effects of septal and hippocampal lesions: a review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 7:1983;119-188.
28. Jarrard L.E. Behavior of hippocampal lesioned rats in home cage and novel situations. Physiol Behav. 3:1968;65-70.
29. Myhrer T. The role of medial and lateral hippocampal perforant path lesions and object distinctiveness in rat's reaction to novelty. Physiol Behav. 42:1988;371-377.
30. Kelche C, Will BE. Effects of postoperative enrichment on behavioral recovery are both lesion- and task-dependent. Soc Neurosci Abst 1989:978.
31. Wiig K.A., Bilkey D.K. The effects of perirhinal cortical lesions on spatial reference memory in the rat. Behav Brain Res. 63:1994;101-109.
32. Bouffard J.P., Jarrard L.E. Acquisition of a complex place task in rats with selective ibotenate lesions of the hippocampal formation: combined lesions of subiculum and entorhinal cortex versus hippocampus. Behav Neurosci. 102:1988;828-834.
33. Glenn MJ, Mumby DG. Place and object recognition deficits following lesions of the hippocampus or perirhinal cortex in rats: a double dissociation. Soc Neurosci Abst 1996:1120.
34. Hodges H. Maze procedures: the radial-arm and the water maze compared. Cogn Brain Res. 3:1996;167-181.
35. Foreman N., Stevens R. Relationships between the superior colliculus and the hippocampus: Neural and behavioural considerations. Behav Brain Sci. 10:1987;101-152.
36. Lasher S.S., Steward O. The time course of changes in open-field activity following bilateral entorhinal lesions in rats and cats. Behav Neural Biol. 32:1981;1-20.
37. Mumby D.G., Pinel J.P.J., Kornecook T.J., Shen M.J., Redila V.A. Memory deficits following lesions of hippocampus or amygdala in rat: assessment by an object-memory test battery. Psychobiology. 23:1995;26-36.
38. Rothblat L.A., Kromer L.F. Object recognition in the rat: the role of the hippocampus. Behav Brain Res. 42:1991;25-32.
39. Mumby D.G., Pinel J.P.J. Rhinal cortex lesions and object recognition in rats. Behav Neurosci. 108:1994;11-18.
40. Rothblat L.A., Vnek N., Gleason T.C., Kromer L.F. Role of the parahippocampal region in spatial and nonspatial memory: effects of parahippocampal lesions on rewarded alternation and concurrent object discrimination learning in the rat. Behav Brain Res. 55:1993;93-100.