Himeic acid A: A new ubiquitin-activating enzyme inhibitor isolated from a marine-derived fungus, Aspergillus sp.

Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry Letters

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 191-194

  Tsukamoto, Sachiko ^a   Hirota, Hiroshi ^b,c   Imachi, Misako ^d   Fujimuro, Masahiro ^e   Onuki, Hiroyuki ^b,c   Ohta, Tomihisa ^a   Yokosawa, Hideyoshi ^e  

^a KANAZAWA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b RIKEN YOKOHAMA INSTITUTE   (Japan)

^c YOKOHAMA CITY UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^d Bruker Corporation   (United States)

^e HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Aspergillus sp.; Marine derived fungus; Ubiquitin activating enzyme inhibitor

Indexed keywords

ACID; ENZYME INHIBITOR; HIMEIC ACID A; HIMEIC ACID B; HIMEIC ACID C; UBIQUITIN; UBIQUITIN PROTEIN LIGASE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; ASPERGILLUS; CONCENTRATION RESPONSE; DRUG ACTIVITY; DRUG ISOLATION; DRUG STRUCTURE; ENZYME INHIBITION; FUNGUS; FUNGUS CULTURE; INHIBITION KINETICS; SPECTROSCOPY; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS;

ASPERGILLUS; ENZYME INHIBITORS; FATTY ACIDS, UNSATURATED; MARINE BIOLOGY; PYRONES; SPECTROMETRY, MASS, FAST ATOM BOMBARDMENT; UBIQUITIN-ACTIVATING ENZYMES;

ASPERGILLUS SP.; FUNGI;

EID: 9644281548     PISSN: 0960894X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2004.10.012     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. A. Hershko, and A. Ciechanover Annu. Rev. Biochem. 67 1998 425 479
2. A.M. Weissman Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2 2001 169 178
3. C.M. Pickart Annu. Rev. Biochem. 70 2001 503 533
4. M.H. Glickman, and A. Ciechanover Physiol. Rev. 82 2002 373 428
5. J. Adams Drug Discovery Today 8 2003 307 315
6. S. Tsukamoto, M. Tatsuno, R.W.M. van Soest, H. Yokosawa, and T. Ohta J. Nat. Prod. 66 2003 1181 1185
7. S. Tsukamoto, K. Yamashita, K. Tane, R. Kizu, T. Ohta, S. Matsunaga, N. Fusetani, H. Kawahara, and H. Yokosawa Biol. Pharm. Bull. 27 2004 699 701
8. The fungus was identified on the basis of the morphological evaluation by NCIBM Japan Co., Ltd (Shizuoka, Japan). A voucher specimen is deposited at Kanazawa University with the code MF275
9. The fungus was grown in a fermentation broth composed of 1:1 artificial seawater/deionized water with 2.0% malt extract and 0.5% peptone at 28°C for 8 days
10. 8 436.1971)
11. 5 322.1654)
12. 7 435.2132)
13. T. Yabuuchi, and T. Kusumi J. Org. Chem. 65 2000 397 404
14. +
15. A. Haas, J. Warms, A. Hershko, and I. Rose J. Biol. Chem. 257 1982 2543 2548
16. A. Haas, and I. Rose J. Biol. Chem. 257 1982 10329 10337
17. H. Walden, M.S. Podgorski, and B.A. Schulman Nature 422 2003 330 334
18. H. Walden, M.S. Podgorski, D.T. Huang, D.W. Miller, R.J. Howard, D.L. Minor Jr., J.M. Holton, and B.A. Schulman Mol. Cell. 12 2003 1427 1437
19. Y. Saeki, Y. Tayama, A. Toh-e, and H. Yokosawa Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 320 2004 840 845
20. 2, 2 mM ATP, and 0.25 units of inorganic pyrophosphatase (Sigma), and subsequently 0.5 μL GST-Ub (MBL) was added to the mixture and the resulting mixture was incubated at 37°C for 60 min. The reaction was terminated by the addition of SDS-loading buffer and the reaction mixture was then subjected to SDS-PAGE in a slab gel containing 7% polyacrylamide under nonreducing conditions. After the proteins were blotted to the nitrocellurose membranes (BIO-RAD), blocking with 5% skim milk in phosphate-buffered saline containing 0.1% Tween 20 and the subsequent immunoblotting were carried out. For immunochemical detection of Flag-tagged E1, a mouse monoclonal M2 antibody against Flag-tag (SIGMA) and peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse IgG (Amersham) were used as the first and second antibodies, respectively. Detection was performed using an enhanced chemiluminescence system (Amersham), and bands were visualized with a BIO-RAD Fluor-S™ MultiImager and analyzed by a BIO-RAD Image Analysis System
21. L. Hicke Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2 2001 195 201
22. C.-Y. Wang, B.-G. Wang, G. Brauers, H.-S. Guan, P. Proksch, and R. Ebel J. Nat. Prod. 65 2002 772 775
23. R. Sekizawa, S. Ikeno, H. Nakamura, H. Naganawa, S. Matsui, H. Iinuma, and T. Takeuchi J. Nat. Prod. 65 2002 1491 1493