Combined optimization of feature selection and algorithm parameters in machine learning of language

Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence (Subseries of Lecture Notes in Computer Science)

Volumn 2837, Issue , 2003, Pages 84-95

  Daelemans, Walter ^a   Hoste, Véronique ^a   De Meulder, Fien ^a   Naudts, Bart ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ANTWERP   (Belgium)

^b FUND FOR SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; COMPUTER PROGRAMMING; FEATURE EXTRACTION; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; OPTIMIZATION; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; QUERY LANGUAGES; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; GENETIC ALGORITHMS; LEARNING SYSTEMS; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

ALGORITHM PARAMETERS; INDUCTIVE LOGIC PROGRAMMING (ILP); INFORMATION SOURCES (IS); SPEECH TAGGING; EMPIRICAL APPROACH; LEARNING APPROACH; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING; SOURCES OF INFORMATIONS; WORD SENSE DISAMBIGUATION;

LEARNING SYSTEMS; LEARNING ALGORITHMS;

EID: 9644279608     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-39857-8_10     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Ethem Alpaydin. Combined 5 × 2 cv F test for comparing supervised classification learning algorithms. Neural Computation, 11(8):1885-1892, 1999.
2. Michele Banko and Eric Brill. Scaling to very very large corpora for natural language disambiguation. In Proceedings of the 39th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 26-33. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2001.
3. William W. Cohen. Fast effective rule induction. In Proc. 12th International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 115-123. Morgan Kaufmann, 1995.
4. Walter Daelemans and Véronique Hoste. Evaluation of machine learning methods for natural language processing tasks. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2002), pages 755-760, 2002.
5. Walter Daelemans, Antal van den Bosch, and Jakub Zavrel. Forgetting exceptions is harmful in language learning. Machine Learning, 34:11-41, 1999.
6. Walter Daelemans, Jakub Zavrel, Ko van der Sloot, and Antal van den Bosch. Timbl: Tilburg memory based learner, version 4.0, reference guide. Technical report, ILK Technical Report 01-04, 2001.
7. Thomas G. Dietterich. Approximate statistical tests for comparing supervised classification learning algorithms. Neural Computation, 10(7):1895-1923, 1998.
8. Phil Edmonds and Adam Kilgarriff, editors. Journal of Natural Language Engineering special issue based on Senseval-S, volume 9. Cambridge University Press, 2003.
9. Gerard Escudero, Lluis Marquez, and German Rigau. Boosting applied to word sense disambiguation. In European Conference on Machine Learning, pages 129-141, 2000.
10. Adam Kilgarriff and Martha Palmer, editors. Computers and the Humanities special issue based on Senseval-1, volume 34. 1999.
11. Ron Kohavi and George H. John. Wrappers for feature subset selection. Artificial Intelligence, 97(1-2):273-323, 1997.
12. Anne Kool, Walter Daelemans, and Jakub Zavrel. Genetic algorithms for feature relevance assignment in memory-based language processing. In Claire Cardie, Walter Daelemans, Claire Nédellec, and Erik Tjong Kim Sang, editors, Proceedings of the Fourth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning and of the Second Learning Language in Logic Workshop, Lisbon, 2000, pages 103-106. Association for Computational Linguistics, Somerset, New Jersey, 2000.
13. Anne Kool, Jakub Zavrel, and Walter Daelemans. Simultaneous feature selection and parameter optimization for memory-based natural language processing. In Ad Feelders, editor, Proceedings of the 10th BENELEARN meeting, pages 93-100. Tilburg, The Netherlands, 2000.
14. Claudia Leacock, Geoffrey Towell, and Ellen Voorhees. Corpus-based statistical sense resolution. In Proceedings of the ARPA Workshop on Human Language Technology, pages 260-265, March 1993.
15. Yoong Keok Lee and Hwee Tou Ng. An empirical evaluation of knowledge sources and learning algorithms for word sense disambiguation. In Proceedings of the 2002 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-2002), pages 41-48, 2002.
16. Raymond J. Mooney. Comparative experiments on disambiguating word senses: An illustration of the role of bias in machine learning. In Eric Brill and Kenneth Church, editors, Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 82-91. Association for Computational Linguistics, Somerset, New Jersey, 1996.
17. Hwee Tou Ng and Hian Beng Lee. Integrating multiple knowledge sources to disambiguate word sense: An exemplar-based approach. In Arivind Joshi and Martha Palmer, editors, Proceedings of the Thirty-Fourth Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 40-47, San Francisco, 1996. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
18. Steven L. Salzberg. On comparing classifiers: Pitfalls to avoid and a recommended approach. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 1(3):317-327, 1997.
19. Jorn Veenstra, Antal Van den Bosch, Sabine Buchholz, Walter Daelemans, and Jakub Zavrel. Memory-based word sense disambiguation. Computing and the Humanities, 2000.
20. Walter Daelemans Véronique Hoste, Iris Hendrickx and Antal van den Bosch. Parameter optimization for machine-learning of word sense disambiguation. Natural Language Engineering, pages 311-325, 2002.
21. Sholom Weiss and Nitin Indurkhya. Predictive Data Mining: A Practical Guide. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, 1998.