Evaluating systemic educational reform: Facing the methodological, practical, and political challenges

Arts Education Policy Review

Volumn 101, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 25-30

  Frechtling, Joy ^a  

^a WESTAT   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 9344258303     PISSN: 10632913     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10632910009600263     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Campbell, P. T., and J. C. Stanley. 1963. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin Company.
2. Catterall, J. 1998. Does experience in the arts boost academic achievement? A response to Eisner. Art Education 51 (May).
3. Corcoran, T. 1997. The role of evaluation in systemic reform. In Research on systemic reform: What have we learned? What do we know? 64-68. Madison, Wis.: National Institute for Science Education.
4. Council of Chief State School Officers. 1997. Priorities for arts education. Washington, D.C.: Council of State School Officers.
5. Eisner, E. 1998. A Response to Catterall. Art Education 51 (May).
6. Harris, L. 1992. Americans and the arts 6. New York: American Council for the Arts.
7. Millar, S., D. Bowcock, R. Gunter, and R. Mesquita. 1997. Themes articulated in forum participants think pieces. In Research on systemic reform: What have we learned? What do we know? 13-46. Madison, Wis.: National Institute for Science Education.
8. Smith, M., and J. O’Day. 1991. Putting the pieces together: Systemic school reform. CPRE Policy Brief. New Brunswick, N.J.: Eagleton Institute of Politics.
9. Stufflebeam, D. L. 1999. Foundation models for 21s' century educational program evaluation. Paper presented at the Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada. 19-23 April.
10. Teachers College. 1999. Learning in and through the arts: Transfer and higher order thinking. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University. Xeroxed.
11. Wilson, B. 1997. The quiet evolution. Los Angeles, Calif.: The Getty Education Institute for the Arts.
12. Yin, R. K. 1995. New methods for evaluating programs in NSF’s Division of Research, Evaluation and Dissemination. In FOOTPRINTS: Strategies for non- traditional program evaluation, edited by J. Frechtling, 25-36. Arlington, Va.: National Science Foundation.