Direct comparison of a contractility and activity pacemaker sensor during treadmill exercise testing

PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology

Volumn 27, Issue 11, 2004, Pages 1493-1499

  Erol Yilmaz, Ayten ^a   Tukkie, Raymond ^a   De Boo, Job ^b   Schrama, Tim ^a   Wilde, Arthur ^a  

^a ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b Department of Cardiology   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Cardiac contractility; Exercise testing; Pacemaker sensor; Peak endocardial acceleration

Indexed keywords

AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; CHRONOTROPISM; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVALESCENCE; DEVICE; ENDOCARDIUM; EXERCISE TEST; FEMALE; HEART ACTIVITY SENSOR; HEART CONTRACTION; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE FUNCTION; HEART MUSCLE CONTRACTILITY; HEART RATE; HUMAN; MALE; PACEMAKER; PEAK ENDOCARDIAL ACCELERATION SENSOR; PIEZOELECTRICITY; SENSOR; TREADMILL EXERCISE;

AGED; ATRIAL FIBRILLATION; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; EXERCISE TEST; EXERCISE TOLERANCE; FEMALE; HEART BLOCK; HEART RATE; HUMANS; MALE; MYOCARDIAL CONTRACTION; PACEMAKER, ARTIFICIAL; REST; SICK SINUS SYNDROME; SUPINE POSITION; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 9344240817     PISSN: 01478389     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2004.00666.x     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Leung SK, Lau CP. Developments in sensor-driven pacing. Cardiol Clin 2000; 18:113-155.
2. Langenfeld H, Krein A, Kirstein M, et al. Peak endocardial acceleration-based clinical testing of the "BEST" DDDR pacemaker. European PEA Clinical Investigation Group. PACE 1998; 21:2187-191.
3. Clementy J. Dual chamber rate responsive pacing system driven by contractility: Final assessment after 1-year follow-up. The European PEA Clinical Investigation Group. PACE 1998; 21:2192-197.
4. Rickards AF, Bombardini T, Corbucci G, et al. An implantable intracardiac accelerometer for monitoring myocardial contractility. The Multicenter PEA Study Group. PACE 1996; 19:2066-2071.
5. Wilkoff BL, Miller RE. Exercise testing for chronotropic assessment. Cardiol Clin 1992; 10:705-717.
6. Mianulli MBD, Markowitz T. A comparison of strap-on versus implanted activity based rate responsive pacemakers: Are strap-on studies valid? PACE 1991; 14:732.
7. Oto ATS, Ozin B, et al. The use of rate response function during daily life in patients with rate adaptive pacemakers with two different sensors. Eur JPE 1993; 1:59-62.
8. Stofmeel MA, Post MW, Kelder JC, et al. Quality-of-life of pacemaker patients: A reappraisal of current instruments. PACE 2000; 23:946-952.
9. Greco EM, Ferrario M, Romano S. Clinical evaluation of peak endocardial acceleration as a sensor for rate responsive pacing. PACE 2003; 26:812-818.
10. Occhetta EPA, Rognoni G, et al. Experience with a new myocardial acceleration sensor during dobutamine infusion and exercise test. Eur J Cardiac Pacing Electrophysiol 1995; 5:204-209.
11. Clementy J, Kobeissi A, Garrigue S, et al. Validation by serial standardized testing of a new rate-responsive pacemaker sensor based on variations in myocardial contractility. Europace 2001; 3:124-131.
12. Ritter P, Padeletti L, Gillio-Meina L, et al. Determination of the optimal atrioventricular delay in DDD pacing. Comparison between echo and peak endocardial acceleration measurements. Europace 1999; 1:126-130.
13. Dupuis JM, Kobeissi A, Vitali L, et al. Programming optimal atrioventricular delay n dual chamber pacing using peak endocardial acceleration: Comparison with a standard echocardiographic procedure. PACE 2003; 26:210-213.
14. Deharo JC, Brunetto AB, Bellocci F, et al. DDDR pacing driven by contractility versus DDI pacing in vasovagal syncope: A multicenter, randomized study. PACE 2003; 26:447-450.
15. Deharo JC, Peyre JP, Chalvidan T, et al. Continuous monitoring of an endocardial index of myocardial contractility during head-up tilt test. Am Heart J 2000; 139:1022-1030.
16. Bordachar P, Garrigue S, Reuter S, et al. Hemodynamic assessment of right, left, and biventricular pacing by peak endocardial acceleration and echocardiography in patients with end-stage heart failure. PACE 2000; 23:1726-1730.
17. Plicchi G, Marcelli E, Parlapiano M, et al. PEA I and PEA II based implantable hemodynamic monitor: Pre clinical studies in sheep. EuroPACE 2002; 4:49-54.
18. Vitali L, Gaggini G, Ceron C. Improved hemodynamic sensor and lead. 2002.
19. Freedman RA, Hopper DL, Mah J, et al. Assessment of pacemaker chronotropic response: Implementation of the Wilkoff mathematical model. PACE 2001; 24:1748-1754.
20. Kay GN. Quantitation of chronotropic response; Comparison of methods for rate-modulating permanent pacemakers. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992; 20:1533-1541.
21. Page E, Defaye P, Bonnet JL, et al. Comparison of the cardiopulmonary response to exercise in recipients of dual sensor DDDR pacemakers versus a healthy control group. PACE 2003; 26:239-243.
22. Ellestad MH. Stress testing principles and practice, third edition:567-573.
23. Mehta D, Lau CF, Ward DE, et al. Comparative evaluation of chronotropic responses of QT sensing and activity sensing rate responsive pacemakers. PACE 1988; 11:1405-1412.
24. Alt E, Kriegler C, Fotuhi P, et al. Feasibility of using intracardiac impedance measurements for capture detection. PACE 1992; 15:1873-1879.
25. Alt E, Matula M, Holzer K. Behavior of different activity-based pacemakers during treadmill exercise testing with variable slopes: A comparison of three activity-based pacing systems. PACE 1994; 17:1761-1770.
26. Werner J, Hexamer M, Meine M, et al. Restoration of cardiocirculatory regulation by rate-adaptive pacemaker systems: The bioengineering view of a clinical problem. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1999; 46:1057-1064.
27. Leung SK, Lau CP, Tang MO. Cardiac output is a sensitive indicator of difference in exercise performance between single and dual sensor pacemakers. PACE 1998; 21:35-41.
28. Sulke N, Dritsas A, Chambers J, et al. Is accurate rate response programming necessary? PACE 1990; 13:1031-1044.
29. Clementy J, Barold SS, Garrigue S, et al. Clinical significance of multiple sensor options: Rate response optimization, sensor blending, and trending. Am J Cardiol 1999; 83:166D-171D.
30. Wood JC, Festen MP, Lim MJ, et al. Regional effects of myocardial ischemia on epicardially recorded canine first heart sounds. J Appl Physiol 1994; 76:291-302.