Development as micro-genetic positioning

British Journal of Developmental Psychology

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 521-530

  Korobov, Neill ^a   Bamberg, Michael ^a  

^a CLARK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 9344231378     PISSN: 0261510X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1348/0261510042378218     Document Type: Review

References (22)

1. Archer, J. (2004). The trouble with 'doing boy'. Psychologist, 17, 132-136.
2. Bamberg, M. (2003). Review of Crispin Sattwell's 'End of Story'. Narrative Inquiry, 13, 473-481.
3. Bamberg, M. (in press). 'I know it may sound mean to say this, but we couldn't really care less about her anyway.' Form and functions of 'slut-bashing' in male identity constructions in 15-year-olds. Human Development.
4. Butler, J. (1995). Collected and fractured: Responses to identities. In K. A. Appiah & H. L. Gates (Eds.), Identities (pp. 439-447). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5. Campbell, A. (2004). Commentary - Words, words, words. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 22, 509-513.
6. Coyle, A. Walton, C. (2004). Commentary - Why performances of accountability and normative heterosexual masculinity do not constitute 'maturity'. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 22, 515-520.
7. Edwards, D. & Stokoe, E.H. (2004). Commentary-Discursive psychology, focus group interviews and participants' categories. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 22, 499-507.
8. Hammersley, M. (2003a). Conversation analysis and discourse analysis: Methods or paradigms? Discourse and Society, 14, 751-781.
9. Hammersley, M. (2003b). Doing the fine thing: A rejoinder to Jonathan Potter. Discourse and Society, 14, 795-798.
10. Hammersley, M. (2003c). The impracticallty of skepticism: A further response to Potter. Discourse and Society, 14, 803-804.
11. Harré, R., & van Langenhove, L. (1999). Introducing positioning theory. In R. Harré & L. van Langenhove (Eds.), Positioning theory: Moral contexts of intentional action (pp. 14-31). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
12. Korobov, N. & Bamberg, M. (2004). Positioning a 'mature' self in interactive practices: How adolescent males negotiate 'physical attraction' in group talk. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 22, 471-492.
13. Packer, M. (1987). Social interaction as practical activity: Implications for the study of social and moral development. In W. M. Kurtinez & J. L. Gewirtz (Eds.), Moral development through social interaction. New York: John Wiley.
14. Phoenix, A. (2004). Commentary - Developing masculinities: Interogating positioning in group talk. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 22, 493-497.
15. Potter, J. (1996). Discourse analysis and constructionist approaches: Theoretical background. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of qualitative research methods for psychology and the social sciences. Leicester, UK: BPS Books.
16. Potter, J. (2002). Two kinds of natural. Discourse Studies, 4, 539-542.
17. Potter, J. (2003a). Discursive psychology: Between method and paradigm. Discourse & Society, 14 (6), 783-794.
18. Potter, J. (2003b). Practical skepticism. Discourse and Society, 14, 799-801.
19. Schegloff, E. A. (1999). 'Schegloff's texts' as 'Billig's data': A critical reply. Discourse and Society, 10, 558-72.
20. Silverman, D. (1999). Warriors or collaborators: Reworking methodological controversies in the study of institutional interaction. In S. Sarangi & C. Roberts (Eds.), Talk, work and institutional order: Discourse in medical, mediation, and management settings (pp. 401-426). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
21. Speer, S. (2002). Natural and contrived data: A sustainable distinction? Discourse Studies, 4, 511-525.
22. Wetherell, M., & Edley, N. (1999). Negotiating hegemonic masculinity: Imaginary positions and pscyho-discursive practices. Feminism and Psychology, 9, 335-356.